Eddie The Eagle (Review)

Uncategorized
6Zy8HlUrFFmJIlsVfv9YOx4PxYO

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

Director: Dexter Fletcher
Starring: Taron Egerton, Hugh Jackman, Jo Hartley, Keith Allen, Iris Berben, Tim McInnerny, Mark Benton, Jim Broadbent, Christopher Walken
Certificate: PG
Run Time: 106 mins

‘Eddie the Eagle’ is a biopic based on the famous English ski jumper, arguably more famous for his personality than his ability in ski jumping. He was one of Britain’s only ski jumpers and came last in both the 70m and 90m jumps in the Calgary Winter Olympics of 1988 but arguably, he has been remembered more vividly for his personality and his determination than those who won gold. Dexter Fletcher directs this biopic and Matthew Vaughn, behind last year’s outstanding ‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’ produces this film under MARV films which he owns. Taron Egerton, who also comes from ‘Kingsman’ plays Michael Edwards (‘Eddie the Eagle’) and is supported by Hugh Jackman who plays fictional coach, Bronson Peary.

‘Eddie the Eagle’ is a very well-intentioned and good-natured film that celebrates the mere participation in sport as opposed to merit but unfortunately succumbs to constant conventionality. Taron Egerton and Hugh Jackman have great chemistry together here and as many reviewers mention, it is definitely a feel-good film that soars at times like the ski jumper but it’s very by-the-numbers. Matthew Margeson’s score is also fitting at times but comes off a little pantomime-like. Also viewer beware, if you want to watch an accurate account of Eddie the Eagle then this is not the film for you. I’d say roughly 80% of the film is fictionalised except for the groundwork that the film works on. It’s a baffling decision and one that leaves a very sour taste – it’s a ‘true’ story that has been drastically altered for cinematic purposes.

The performances are where the film really excels and both Taron Egerton and Hugh Jackman shine here. Taron Egerton plays the titular character as very determined and earnest and his character is suitably well-developed. Egerton has been on a roll lately as he was brilliant in ‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’ and also was one of the highlights of ‘Legend’ in a supporting role. Hugh Jackman plays fictional coach, Bronson Peary, a ski jumper who found success in the past but has now resorted to drinking and moping around. The chemistry of Egerton and Jackman is excellent and really drives the film along. Jo Hartley and Keith Allen play Edwards’ parents and both also share great chemistry with Egerton. Christopher Walken makes a small and slightly odd cameo as Warren Sharp, again a fictionalised character but Walken is one of cinema’s greatest actors that he can elevate anything that he plays in.  There is also a small role played by Tim McInnerny who is also always reliable in delivering a good performance.

Fletcher manages to establish a well-suited atmosphere here that like the film, feels a little odd and magical but the film is very engaging at times. All of Edwards’ jumps are shot extremely well and each time, I was on the edge of my seat on whether he was going to hurt himself or not – that is testament to how well the character is developed. Whilst being a little clichéd, the film hails participation in sport as more important than merit which does create a feel-good effect for audiences and the film’s final act is perhaps where at its strongest when he participates in the Olympics and I felt as if I was part of the Olympic audience spectating – the film really can be engaging at times.

However where all the film’s good work is undone is its accuracy. Why, why, why make a movie that is 80% a big lie?!!! He didn’t train in Germany, he trained in America and both Jackman’s and Walken’s character are fictionalised as is also the fact that his father is not shown to be supportive – Edwards’ father in this film is portrayed as quite a challenge for him to get past. I don’t understand why anyone would want to do this and it really leaves a sour taste over a film that is pretty solid.

Overall, ‘Eddie the Eagle’ is a very solid film despite being overly clichéd and by-the-numbers and it’s worth seeing alone for the performances by Egerton and Jackman. At times, the film really works and it is a very easy and light film to watch that does have a good rewatchability factor. But I really don’t understand why the filmmakers have decided to completely botch the real story behind this man and it is a real shame. As a film in its own right, it works but as a sports biopic, it’s wildly inaccurate.

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

10 Cloverfield Lane (Review)

Uncategorized
10 Cloverfield Lane

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Director: Dan Trachtenberg
Starring: Mary Elizabeth Winstead, John Goodman, John Gallagher Jr. 
Certificate: 12A
Run Time: 103 mins

’10 Cloverfield Lane’ is a ‘spiritual’ sequel to the 2008 hit ‘Cloverfield’ that was highly anticipated for 6 months after a very secretive trailer was released in the Summer of 2007. (Read more about this here). Straight off the heels on ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’, producer J. J. Abrams released a trailer for this unexpected sequel and once again, fans got their hopes up after the first film had been so warmly received. Like with all of Abrams’ works, the trailer once again was very vague and holds a lot of the twists that the film has to offer up its sleeve. It really is genius marketing. One of the gifts that ‘Cloverfield’ gave us was director Matt Reeves who went on to direct, ‘Let Me In’ and ‘Dawn of the Planet of the Apes’. This sequel is directed by Dan Trachtenberg in his debut so he too could be destined for success. The film features an impressive cast featuring Mary Elizabeth Winstead, John Goodman and John Gallagher Jr., the three of them staying in an underground bunker after Goodman’s patchy character reveals that there has been an attack on the world which is uninhabitable. So is the film any good or is this just an unworthy cash grab associated with the first film?

’10 Cloverfield Lane’ is an incredible, intense Hitchcockian film that is taut and claustrophobic and gives us three fantastic performances from its trio. The script is absolutely terrific and it’s very easy to spot ‘Whiplash’ director, Damien Chazelle’s contribution. Dan Trachtenberg’s direction is very astute and assured and he will surely go on to do great things. It is a superb film and is 5-star material. Unfortunately, all this good work is undone by a very lacklustre final 15 minutes which is very haphazardly handled and tarnishes all the good work done and leaves a very sour note on all the development the film has undergone to set the audience up to its ending. However, just taking the film alone with the exception of this muddled ending, it is near-perfect.

The cast are vital in this film and if they weren’t convincing, the film wouldn’t have been as successful as it has been. I have not been a fan of Mary Elizabeth Winstead in the past, but in this she is absolutely fantastic in a career-best performance. Her character is constantly kept in the dark throughout the film and her development as a character is very well-realised but I did find her transformation into a full-on action hero towards the end of the film a little unrealistic. John Gallagher Jr is also very sound here and is someone who doesn’t play in films often so this hopefully should be a break for him. However, John Goodman completely steals the show here in what is a  career-best performance for him. The audience are never sure whether or not his character can be trusted or not and Goodman plays the role with so much charisma. At times, he is downright terrifying whereas at times, the audience are fairly sympathetic towards him.

The story is very well-handled and plenty is left up to the viewer’s imagination which is very effective. It is so well-directed, especially the first few minutes leading up to the opening credits feel straight out of an Alfred Hitchcock film and there are many encounters between the characters that are so cleverly scripted. At times, the film is very intense and I am a little surprised that the BBFC only gave the film a 12A which I feel is a little lenient. Without giving spoilers, it really is such a shame that all the good work is undone in the film’s climax which was so desperately disappointing.

I had not heard of Bear McCreary before this, but the score for this film is incredible and is very Bernard Herrman-esque. The first ‘Cloverfield’ was famous for having no score at all save for a 12 minute piece called ‘Roar!’ in the closing credits by Abrams-regular, Michael Giacchino. McCreary is another talent to watch and I’m sure will land some very interesting projects given the success of this film.

Overall, ’10 Cloverfield Lane’ is a stunning piece of cinema and is very intense and carefully directed by newcomer Dan Trachtenberg. The cast here are incredible with John Goodman stealing the show. It’s just a real shame that all the good work is undone in the last 15 minutes but with the exception of this, this film is very impressive. It will be interesting to see if Abrams can strike gold thrice with the announcement of this film 2 months prior to its release being very unexpected. To strike with the element of surprise, perhaps there will have to be an even longer break between this and a third instalment if there is one. Both film’s have been marketed fantastically and the prospect of a third film must be very daunting for the crew if they want it to have the same impact.

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

High-Rise (Review)

Uncategorized
maxresdefault1

⭐⭐ (Poor)

Director: Ben Wheatley 
Starring: Tom Hiddleston, Jeremy Irons, Sienna Miller, Luke Evans, Elisabeth Moss
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 119 mins

‘High-Rise’ is an adaptation of the same novel by J.G Ballard that has been deemed “unfilmbable”. It’s faced a long history of being brought to the screen since the 1970’s when producer Jeremy Thomas tried to get the film made with Nicolas Roeg directing but it could never lift off the ground. Finally in 2013 after a few more efforts, Ben Wheatley, most famous for ‘Kill List’ and ‘Sightseers’, stepped into the director’s chair with his wife, Amy Jump, adapting the book into a script. This is Wheatley’s largest budget film to date and his direction doesn’t always appeal to mass audiences. The film has received rather polarising reviews with some labelling it as a masterpiece to some downright hating it.

‘High-Rise’ starts off well enough and has an intriguing premise but the film descends into an indecipherable mess that is poorly handled by Wheatley who doesn’t seem to have a firm-enough grasp on the material. There are also some excellent performances here from Tom Hiddleston and Elisabeth Moss  but it’s not enough to save this hodgepodge of a film. Any tension built up towards the film’s climactic third act is lost and the film becomes very dull. Hats off to Wheatley for giving this a go but this ‘Lord of the Flies’ meets ‘Ex_Machina’ mash-up unfortunately doesn’t meet the bill.

The cast is a mixed bag – Tom Hiddleston and Elisabeth Moss are the standouts here, particularly Hiddleston who owns the role as the lead character, Laing. He is really turning into one of Great Britain’s national treasures when it comes to acting. Laing is constantly kept in the dark as to what the true intentions of his fellow neighbours in the high-rise are up to and as an audience, it is interesting to see his character develop and ultimately morph into a figure who suits this high-rise life. Elisabeth Moss is also very good here in a supporting role as a pregnant neighbour who is quite vulnerable and doesn’t quite know how to tread around her husband. Luke Evans who plays him is downright awful here and his character seems wildly out of place here and is annoying and animalistic. Jeremy Irons and Sienna Miller round off the main cast and both are sound.

The story details an almost Marxist, volatile environment that crumbles during the course of the film. It does have the potential to be a really interesting film but Wheatley cannot deliver on the tension-building first act and the film turns into an indecipherable mess as it comes to its final act. It drags on and on (the film is only 119 minutes though) and this lack of tension results in some dull stretches. Even the Clint Mansell score, which is one of the highlights of the film, cannot save it nor can the stellar cinematography by Laurie Rose.

It’s a real shame that ‘High-Rise’ isn’t as good as it should be as the material has the potential to make an interesting, moral-questioning watch but Wheatley just doesn’t seem to have a firm grasp on the material. The film is ultimately extremely dull in parts, especially in its overlong final act. However, ‘High-Rise’ is not a totally wasted experience as the performances by Tom Hiddleston and Elisabeth Moss are excellent here as is the cinematography and score and the film’s promising first act.

⭐⭐ (Poor)

Grimsby (Review)

Uncategorized
1272574 - Grimsby

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Director: Louis Leterrier
Starring: Sacha Baron Cohen, Mark Strong, Isla Fisher, Rebel Wilson, Gabourey Sidibe, Annabelle Wallis, Ian McShane, Penélope Cruz
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 83 mins

Carl Allen “Nobby” Butcher, is the latest creation of comedy genius Sacha Baron Cohen in ‘Grimsby’ (otherwise known as ‘The Brothers Grimsby’ in America), the man behind Ali G, Borat, Brüno and General Aladeen. This time he plays a football hooligan with multiple kids living in the seaside town of Grimsby who tracks down his brother who is a spy for MI5. The actual town of Grimsby is very negatively portrayed in the film and has caused controversy. The film is directed by Louis Leterrier who has a very patchy track record with his films – he has directed the first two instalments of ‘The Transporter’ series which was poor and then ‘The Incredible Hulk’, ‘Clash of the Titans’ and ‘Now You See Me’ all of which were well-intentioned but very flawed. So to have Leterrier directing someone as talented as Sacha Baron Cohen in a comedy which he has never tackled before causes very mixed feelings.

‘Grimsby’ is one of the best comedies of the decade – it is consistently hilarious (although quite vulgar in parts) and the cast are wonderful, in particular the two leads, Sacha Baron Cohen and Mark Strong, who displays a real panache for comedic roles. Louis Leterrier has really developed as a director and seems to have a flair for comedy.  However, the only criticism is that Leterrier still cannot quite grasp how to direct an action scene and this is a recurring theme in all of his films. It’s a real shame how this film has been almost completely misunderstood and has garnered rather mixed reviews.

‘Grimsby’ boasts a strong cast, particularly with the duo of Sacha Baron Cohen and Mark Strong who really elevate the film. One would expect Sacha Baron Cohen to pull off comedic roles as this is what he is most famous for and ‘Nobby’ is another ingenious creation to add to his repertoire but equally as impressive is Mark Strong who is fantastic here. He displayed a comedic side in last years, ‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’ which he was excellent in too and he emulates his success here.  The rest of the cast are rounded out by talents such as Isla Fisher, Rebel Wilson, Gabourey Sidibe, Annabelle Wallis, Ian McShane and Penélope Cruz who are all sound but this film really does belong to the main duo.

The film is consistently funny from beginning to end which is very rare for a comedy film which generally tend to lose steam at some point. ‘Grimsby’ is one of those rare films that bucks this trend and one has to admire it in this respect. The ‘British’ humour works best and the film can be quite vulgar at times but what ruined Baron Cohen’s previous works was the fact that the humour overstepped the mark and was consistently crude. A lot of the success here is down to the script penned by Baron Cohen and Phil Johnston who both seem to have a love of this story and the script feels very refined and polished with humour constantly thrown into the mix.

‘Grimsby’ has also got a great heart to it as well which adds another dimension to this film and really elevates its quality. Not many comedies can balance comedy and emotion and this manages to handle this very assuredly. There are many flashback sequences that delve into the disturbed childhood of the main characters that are wonderful to watch on-screen as it really develops the characters and allows the audience to really feel for them.

However, one of the only criticisms that I have of ‘Grimsby’ is Leterrier’s ability to craft action sequences. Leterrier resorts to using ‘shaky-cam’ which make some of the action incomprehensible to interpret on-screen rather than using slightly longer shots to detail the action. This is also true in his other films and with all the character development and humour, this does unfortunately let it down a little bit. Part of this is down to cinematographer, Oliver Wood who takes a mis-step here as he is capable of greatness as he shot ‘The Bourne Ultimatum’ which had enthralling action sequences.

Overall, ‘Grimsby’ is an excellent film that is consistently funny and is one of the very best comedies of the decade so far. Sacha Baron Cohen and Mark Strong are a perfect match and both manage to pull off their roles extremely well and the film’s heart really manages to elevate its status.  It is, in my opinion, Sacha Baron Cohen’s best work but the reviews for this film have been very mixed which I find quite hard to understand.  It would seem that audiences tend to prefer the more crude humour that Baron Cohen is capable of. That said, the entire audience in my screening were all laughing from start to finish which is testament to the quality of the film. An excellent effort from all involved.

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Hail, Caesar! (Review)

Uncategorized

 

thumbnail_23310

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

Director: Joel & Ethan Coen
Starring: Josh Brolin, George Clooney, Alden Ehrenreich, Ralph Fiennes, Jonah Hill, Scarlett Johansson, Frances McDormand, Tilda Swinton, Channing Tatum
Certificate: 12A
Run Time: 108 mins

Originally conceived in 2004, ’Hail, Caesar!’ is the latest film directed by the zany auteurs, the Coen Brothers behind hits such as ‘Fargo’, ‘The Big Lebowski’ and ‘No Country For Old Men’. It tells the story of a ‘fixer’ Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin) who is working for Capitol Pictures, a film studio in the 1950’s who is trying to deal with the abduction of a cast member, Baird Whitlock (George Clooney) who disappears during filming. Unfortunately, the film was shelved until 2013 when the Coens picked it back up again after finishing on the stellar, ‘Inside Llewyn Davis’. Critics have generally reacted positively to the film whereas audiences have been very mixed in their opinions. So do the Coens manage to continue their winning streak or is it a disappointment?

‘Hail, Caesar!’ is usual business for the Coen Brothers – they have crafted a smart and fascinating study into the film industry model and the film features some fantastic performances of the Coens’ typically quirky character creations. It brings out some of the Coen’s best qualities but they do also fall into a couple of bad habits, namely going off on a couple of completely unnecessary narrative diversions. That said, it is very easy to see why ‘Hail, Caesar!’ has been polarising to say the least. It is a film that requires multiple viewings and almost certainly a subsequent reassessment and I’m still not sure if the film’s message is genius or irrelevant. It is the ‘Inherent Vice’ of 2016.

One of the Coens’ main strengths and why one would go and watch one of their films is their ability to create vivid and quirky characters. The film really does belong to Josh Brolin and George Clooney who both are wonderful here and are given the most material to contend with. Josh Brolin, in particular, has had a brilliant year and has given good performances in films such as ‘Everest’ and ‘Sicario’.  Newcomer Alden Ehrenreich really shines here and is a talent to watch out for – the Coens’ were able to spot talent in him by casting him in a significant role here and it’s paid off. The rest of the cast aren’t given particularly much to do but Ralph Fiennes, Frances McDormand and Channing Tatum are fantastic, despite only being in a handful of scenes. Ralph Fiennes, still relatively hot off ‘The Grand Budapest Hotel’ continues to demonstrate a real flair for comedy and there is a particularly funny, typically Coen-like moment in the film where there is an encounter between Fiennes and Ehrenreich. Channing Tatum continues to redesign himself from the actor who would give mediocre performances in very mediocre films to someone who has really upped his game. This, in combination with his dark turn in Quentin Tarantino’s, ‘The Hateful Eight’ earlier on in the year is proof of this. He clearly seems to be a winner with what are regarded as some of the top directors in the industry. Finally, Frances McDormand (who is the wife of Joel Coen) has one scene and her portrayal is satirical, yet resemblant of this period in Hollywood cinema.

As for the Coen’s direction, they are at the top of their game in places and there are many standout sequences which demonstrate their ability. A scene early in the film details Brolin’s character discussing the religious accuracy of the portrayal of Jesus’ run-up to his crucifixion and it’s so typically Coen-like and very smartly crafted. Another standout sequence is an encounter between Ehrenreich and Fiennes which again is genius. This is what the Coen’s are best at, crafting standalone sequences that are very intelligently crafted yet a little odd. Perhaps the reason why ‘Hail, Caesar!’ hasn’t appealed to audiences as much as it has to critics is that their intelligence and carefully constructed references to other films, both historical and their own is a little too much for some audience’s grasp. That’s not to say that audiences are stupid, but in order to fully appreciate this film, you need to have a love for cinema and have some background knowledge. This film is ultimately the Coen’s love letter to cinema.

However, the Coen’s continue with their bad habit of pursuing narratives that divert from the main story and ultimately detract the audience from the film. In, ‘Hail, Caesar!’, this unfortunately happens too often particularly within the middle of the film where the Coen’s can’t quite decide what direction to take the unfolding narrative in. Now this mistake isn’t too detrimental as it can be in some of their other works but it’s what prevents the film from being brilliant as there are too many dull moments mixed in with the genius that the Coen’s are capable of. This also could be why audiences have had mixed reactions to the film.

From a technical standpoint, Roger Deakins’ cinematography is stellar as usual and here, chooses to use stock film as opposed to digital to compliment the Coen’s vision. Deakins even revealed he would shoot on an iPhone if that’s how a film would look best. Roger Deakins is a cinematographer who always has a unique vision and understands how to shoot a film so it would be interesting if he ever did decide to shoot a film on an iPhone. Carter Burwell’s score is sound and is used fairly sparingly as the film is very dialogue-heavy.

Overall, ‘Hail, Caesar’ is a fascinating and satirical deconstruction into the Coen’s viewpoint of how the Hollywood studio model worked in its Golden Age and is important in how the film industry continues to function in the present day. It demonstrates a lot of the Coen’s best traits but unfortunately, the narrative does divert a little unnecessarily at times. The acting here is generally superb despite several prolific actors being sidelined and Roger Deakins continues to prove why he is one of the best cinematographers in the film industry. However, it’s very easy to see why the reception to this film has been mixed by some and it’s a film that requires several re-watches and is a film that will almost certainly require further reassessment in the future. But for a Coen Brothers film, it’s very entertaining and intelligent film but its narrative does sometimes goes off the rails.

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

‘Indiana Jones 5’ Is Finally Happening

Uncategorized

indy

Surprisingly, Disney have announced a 5th film into the Indiana Jones franchise and it’s due for release in July 2019. Once again, it will be directed by Steven Spielberg (who has helmed all four so far) and will star Harrison Ford as the titular character.

All four of them are good fun in particular the second one, ‘Temple of Doom’ which is a really dark film, something that Spielberg regrets now but I think it works really well. Even ‘Kingdom of the Crystal Skull’, the 4th entry into the series that received some mixed reviews was good fun. However, I am a little worried that Harrison Ford may be too old now to play him but that said, he just about looked ok physically in ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ and despite the films being awful, he was able to perform his fight scenes in ‘The Expendables’ franchise. At least Shia La Boeuf, who played Indy’s son in the fourth instalment isn’t stepping into the lead role because that would be a bad turn for the franchise. Ford will be 77 years old by the time this comes out, so they better get filming quick!

indy 2

Effective Marketing

Uncategorized

li3ya9ru

There’s a new film coming out next week called ’10 Cloverfield Lane’ and it’s the ‘spiritual’ sequel to 2008’s ‘Cloverfield’. What both of these films have in common is their exceptional marketing, something the film industry is lacking these days. Both films have been produced by J. J. Abrams behind ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ (my review here) and ‘Star Trek’ which both films as well were notorious were for their lack of spoilers.

With the original ‘Cloverfield’, a untitled teaser trailer appeared in July 2007 – just over 6 months before its release. It was very vague but enough to catch audience’s interest with the flying head of the Statue of Liberty. The trailer didn’t give away the film’s title – the only text was the release date ‘1.18.08’ (18th January) so fans went looking around the Internet for clues and Abrams had set up a website with clues for the audience to try and piece together. Social media, in particular Twitter, was relatively young so it was harder for information to pass around. ‘Cloverfield’ built up a lot of hype over the 6 months towards its release date and when it finally opened in America, it was Number 1 at the Box Office.

zz4deb7f97

’10 Cloverfield Lane’ has gone through a similar structure. Hot after the heels of Abrams’, ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’, the trailer for this sequel appeared online just 2 months before its release date and again, it got audiences talking. Perhaps the reason why it was announced last minute is due to the impact of social media or perhaps just so Abrams could get ‘Star Wars’ out of the way first. Either way, it’s genius.

Now whether or not, ’10 Cloverfield Lane’ ends up being a good sequel or not (early reviews would suggest it is a worthy sequel), you have to admire Abrams’ marketing technique. Even for ‘Star Wars’ and both of his ‘Star Trek’ entries, production was shrouded in secrecy and the trailers were deliberately vague to not spoil the whole film.

interstellar_mann_explosion

Christopher Nolan is another filmmaker who is notorious for holding back spoilers for his films up until its release. Although teaser trailers were released more than a year in advance for ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ and ‘Interstellar’, nothing was given away until the film was released. What I particular admire about ‘Interstellar’ was its casting of Matt Damon who wasn’t revealed to be in the cast until very late into production and his character was in wraps up until the film opened. Another ingenious piece of marketing was David Fincher’s, ‘Se7en’ where similar to ‘Interstellar’, no one knew Kevin Spacey was going to be in the film until he shows up. Even in the opening credits to the film, Spacey’s name is omitted.

I think the film industry needs to have a big, long think about the way films should be marketed. With pretty much every mainstream film, trailers constantly ruin the film and promise us something that the film doesn’t give us. With Marvel and DC’s films, they have announced their line-up of films up until 2020 and the upcoming superhero smackdown that is ‘Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice’ first received a teaser trailer in July 2014. That’s a year and a half in advance! Of course, this established to audiences that this film was in the pipeline for those that didn’t know but there have been 3 or 4 trailers now and I’ll be pleasantly surprised if when I watch the film, it is able to surprise me with something new that hasn’t already been spoiled. Everyone knew Jesse Eisenberg’s Lex Luthor was going to be the villain but the second trailer spoiled that Doomsday would feature as well which I think ruins the experience.

maxresdefault

It’s not just spoilers that ruin a film but even the trailer is marketed as a big event. A lot of films release 15 second teasers of the TRAILER a couple of days / weeks in advance. Take the upcoming ‘Warcraft’ for example that released 15 second snippets of the trailer before it was released. This is crazy, in my opinion and it’s killing the film industry. Again, I will be surprised if the film offers anything new to what has been revealed in the trailers.

When you go the cinema or watch a film at home for the first time, it should be a new experience – like going to the theatre for example. When the lights fade out and the opening titles begin to appear on-screen, the audience should be on the edge of their seats and experience what is being portrayed on-screen. A lot of films that I have watched recently have been spoiled for me due to the excessive marketing and when I finally watch them, I tend to feel disappointed and start ticking off a mental checklist of what’s already been shown in the trailers.

jjabrams

That is not what films are about and with talents like J. J. Abrams or Christopher Nolan, whether you like their filmographies or not, you’ve got to respect them for attempting to give to you the filmgoing experience.

’10 Cloverfield Lane’ will be released in UK cinemas on Friday 18th March.

Ranking The Best Picture Nominees

Uncategorized

The Academy Awards have now been and gone and ‘Spotlight’ ended up being triumphant edging out ‘The Revenant’ which took the Golden Globes and BAFTA’s by storm. Here I rank the Best Picture nominees in order of my own personal preference. Unfortunately, I have only just got round to watching ‘Brooklyn’ hence why I am a little late.

Let’s get started…

martian-gallery3-gallery-image

8) The Martian

Unfortunately, ‘The Martian’ was very disappointing. Even though it had been overhyped, as a film it just didn’t work. The performances were not bad although Matt Damon’s nomination was rather undeserved and allowed talents such as Johnny Depp for his performance in ‘Black Mass’ to get snubbed. Ridley Scott’s direction was also ok but he has done far better work, for example 2012’s ‘Prometheus’ is a much better film than this.

1401x788-bgs-02959r__

7) The Big Short

A very original and intelligent film that does deserve a place in the ‘Best Picture’ category but it is towards the bottom of the list due to the fact the film has a lot of issues tonally. At times it comes across as very smug and obnoxious and the film has a bit of an identity crisis as director Adam McKay can’t quite shake off his comedic roots. That said though, it is very original in the way it all plays out and the acting, particularly by Christian Bale and Steve Carrell.

(Click here to read my review)

brooklyn1-1600x900-c-default

6) Brooklyn

‘Brooklyn’ is a fairly unremarkable film that feels quite disjointed and a little too ordinary for the Best Picture Academy Award. However, Saoirse Ronan gives a career-best performance here and there are some outstanding scenes that work separately to the rest of the film. Compared to ‘The Big Short’, I would argue that ‘The Big Short’ is definitely more original and better Awards material but ‘Brooklyn’ is stronger as entertainment.

There is now a big step up in quality…

rs_1024x683-151016083950-1024-tom-hanks-bridge-of-spies-movie-101615

5) Bridge Of Spies

In parts, ‘Bridge of Spies’ is outstanding, particularly in its first half and has a revelatory turn from Mark Rylance which won him the Academy Award for ‘Best Supporting Actor’, deservedly so. Tom Hanks manages to carry the film along, but Rylance’s absence is sorely missed in the second half and the film loses steam. Usual business from Steven Spielberg, but still good fun.

(Click here to read my review)

Now we get to the excellent films:

leonardo-dicaprio-the-revenant-trailer-inarritu-071715

4) The Revenant

A little sluggish in parts, ‘The Revenant’ is a fantastic piece of work with outstanding performances and assured direction from Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu. It’s a very sensory experience and Lubezki’s cinematography is gobsmacking and earned him another Academy Award. This was also the film where Leonardo DiCaprio finally was given an Oscar for his role here, deservedly so.

(Click here to read my review)

spotlight1

3) Spotlight

A gripping tale of the Catholic Church scandal, ‘Spotlight’ is a very assured film that features fantastic performance from the entire cast and a brilliant, tight script penned by Tom McCarthy who also directs. The only reason why it doesn’t rank higher is the fact that it doesn’t particularly do a lot to set itself apart from other films of this type but it’s still supremely entertaining and satisfying.

(Click here to read my review)

720x405-frd-ds-00668

2) Mad Max: Fury Road

An astonishing piece of work by director George Miller against all the odds. Whilst ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ is not perfect by any means and lacks in the story department, the action sequences are a gargantuan work of art and on a technical scale, the film is jaw-dropping. Interwoven into all the action on-screen is a wonderful female leading role by Charlize Theron who is able to redesign the role of the woman in the action film genre.

And now for the best film…

maxresdefault

1) Room

‘Room’ is a flawless piece of work. It is an inspiring watch and reaches various emotional heights. The performances from the cast all round are nothing short of incredible and Lenny Abrahamsson’s careful and assured direction works wonders. The film has a beaming heart at its core – at times the film is devastatingly sad and at others, warm and feel-good. It is expertly paced and takes ample time to develop its characters. ‘Room’ has received a rare 5-star rating from myself and on top of that, is one of the best films of the decade so far. 

(Click here to read my 5-star review)

Summary

Overall, a worthy selection with the exception of ‘The Martian’ and ‘Brooklyn’, but in terms of originality, ‘The Big Short’ deserves its spot even if it is a flawed film. It’s also one of the strongest fields in recent years. ‘Spotlight’ ultimately won the Best Picture Award which is deserving. ‘Room’ is by far and away the best film here but it didn’t connect with audiences as much as this and it was a toss-up between ‘Spotlight’ and ‘The Revenant’. I’d have been happy if ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ would have won but the Academy would be very trepidatious to say the least, to give the highest Award to a blockbuster. 

 

Introducing ‘Focus’ – John Hillcoat

Uncategorized

What is ‘Focus’? 

‘Focus’ is a new feature  primarily designed to raise awareness of talents who are not yet fully recognised. If there is a film that is due to be released and there is a talent there, then they will appear in a ‘Focus’ post. These people can range from actors to directors to cinematographers to composers – anything that deserves a mention! Sometimes higher profile talents may appear but primarily, it is for people who have not yet been recognised.

This Week

This is a little late and I had planned to have finished this last week in time for the film, but I have been catching up with many of the films that have been nominated for Academy Awards. Check out my Reviews for some of the Best Picture nominees and I plan to rank all the Best Picture nominees in a post next week once I watch ‘Brooklyn’.

john_hillcoat

JOHN HILLCOAT

John Hillcoat is a film director, responsible for  last week’s crime thriller ‘Triple 9’. Now ‘Triple 9’ has received mixed-to-positive reviews (I am still yet to see it) but regardless of the quality of the film, Hillcoat is an accomplished director.

He heralds from Australia and started out by directing music videos and rose up to make a documentary of the music band, INXS in 1985. He then went on to making low-budget Australian films which included 1988’s ‘Ghosts…of the Civil Dead’ and ‘To Have and To Hold’ in 1996.

His big break came in 2005 with a western, ‘The Proposition’ starring Guy Pearce and Ray Winstone which received very positive reviews and won 4 Australian Film Institute Awards. It’s a really visceral and well-acted film with a great script penned by Nick Cave who also does a great job in composing the film along with regular Warren Ellis. For me, this is Hillcoat’s best film to date.

He then made his first American film, ‘The Road’, a survival film starring Viggo Mortensen and was Kodi Smit-McPhee’s big break and he won a Critic’s Choice Award. Although generally regarded as his best work, I found ‘The Road’ to be very atmospheric in places and it has some beautifully shot sequences but I thought it fell a little flat the more it went on.

the_road_2_l

‘Lawless’ was Hillcoat’s next film, released in 2012 and is a drama set in the Prohibition era and has a hell of a cast comprised of Shia LaBoeuf, Tom Hardy, Gary Oldman, Mia Wasikowska, Jessica Chastain, Jason Clarke, and Hillcoat-regular Guy Pearce. I really liked the film although it received good-not-great reviews and it’s a gritty and dark film and is very black in its sense of humour. Guy Pearce is the standout here as the sadistic villain.

WETTEST COUNTY Scene 147 Shootout at the bridge

Now 4 years later, ‘Triple 9’ is Hillcoat’s latest offering and once again, has a tremendous cast. Hollywood actors definitely recognise John Hillcoat as a great director to work with, even if his films don’t always receive the best reviews. Hopefully, this talented director will become a household name in the years to come if he keeps doing what he’s doing.

triple_9_poster

‘Triple 9’ is in cinemas now.

Spotlight (Review)

Uncategorized
spotlight1

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Director: Tom McCarthy
Starring: Mark Ruffalo, Michael Keaton, Rachel McAdams, Liev Schreiber, John Slattery, Brian D’Arcy James, Billy Crudup, Stanley Tucci
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 129 mins

‘Spotlight’ is a drama film that delves into the true story of how the Boston Globe’s, ‘Spotlight’ team uncovered the massive scandal of child molestation by Roman Catholic priests and cover-up within the Catholic church. It is directed by Tom McCarthy, a very versatile individual who is best known for directing ‘The Station Agent’ and ‘The Visitor’ , co-writing Disney Pixar’s, ‘Up’ and taking small roles in films from time to time. However a big mis-step for him was directing ‘The Cobbler’ with Adam Sandler which came out earlier in the year and is universally agreed as one of the worst films of the year. Anyway, McCarthy is finally getting recognised for his work with this film which has impressed critics and audiences alike. It is one of the frontrunners to win the coveted Best Picture Academy Award but ‘The Revenant’ will probably pip it to the post.

‘Spotlight’ is an excellent film and really showcases the best in Tom McCathy from his close direction to the excellent, tightly-packed script. The cast are wonderful and it manages to deal with such a sensitive subject matter in a very entertaining and satisfying fashion and once it gets going after establishing a context, it rip-roars right through to the end. However, my only criticism is that it doesn’t do a lot to set itself apart from other films of this genre. It follows the tried-and-tested formula all the way, as entertaining and satisfying as it is.

The acting ensemble is where ‘Spotlight’ excels at – there is not one bad performance here. Mark Ruffalo and Rachel McAdams are the standouts here, the latter a career-best, and consequently both have received Academy Award nominations. Michael Keaton, Brian D’Arcy James and Stanley Tucci are also very good here and Liev Schreiber gives one of his best performances in years despite his role being quite a small one.

The story is particularly powerful and thanks to the cast, are able to convey the shock and betrayal that they feel. There is a particularly powerful scene about half-way into the film when the team uncovers information that this has gone on for years and the shock that they feel is so realistic and we too, as an audience, can empathise. McCarthy does seem to restrain himself with the script as there are so many instances where he could dig into the incompetence of the Catholic Church but always holds himself back – this is a film that just wants to lay the facts out. However, whilst the main ensemble are very well developed, the victims and Priests themselves are rather underdeveloped and I think if McCarthy had chosen to flesh out these characters a little more, it would have made the film more satisfying.

Howard Shore’s score for the film is one of his best in a long time and Masanobu Takayanagi’s cinematography adds another credit to his repertoire after also doing a good job of Scott Cooper’s, ‘Out of the Furnace’ and ‘Black Mass’. Takayanagi uses lots of white and grey to portray Boston, perhaps juxtaposing the innocent white with the increasing guilt that the investigators feel from the Catholic Church covering everything up.

Although ‘Spotlight’ doesn’t break any new ground as a film, it is still an enthralling and totally engaging watch once it gets going, thanks to its fine performances and assured direction. Whilst Ruffalo and McAdams have landed Acting nominations, I don’t think they will win them as their performances haven’t been singled out so much compared to others but the film does have a shot at success for its fantastic screenplay. ‘Spotlight’ could also very well end up being the film that takes the Best Picture Academy Award and if it does, I will have no complaints at all. A very good effort from all involved.

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)