The Woman In Black: Angel Of Death (Review)

Uncategorized
The Woman in Black- Angel of death

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

Director: Tom Harper
Starring: Phoebe Fox, Helen McCrory, Jeremy Irvine, Adrian Rawlins, Leanne Best
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 98 mins

‘The Woman In Black: Angel Of Death’ is the sequel to the film that essentially revived Hammer – ‘The Woman In Black’ and it was the highest grossing British horror film since records began. The film, adapted from Susan Hill’s hit horror novella in 1983, was another resounding success and the novel has also been adapted into a stage play by Stephen Mallatratt and is the second longest-running play in West End’s history, after Agatha Christie’s, ‘The Mousetrap’. In 2013, Hammer decided to greenlight a sequel to the smash-hit film and the novel was penned by crime writer Martyn Waites with Susan Hill having creative input and also helping to write the script for the film.

This time, the story is set in the height of the Second World War where London is being bombed. Headmistress Jean Hogg (played astutely by Helen McCrory) and Teacher Eve Parkins (Phoebe Fox’s debut film role) are evacuating a class of children to the countryside, in this case, the dreaded Eel Marsh House where almost immediately a dangerous presence is lurking and the children are slowly being picked off one by one. Who could it be? The Woman in Black, of course!

The film doesn’t hold itself up anywhere remotely near to the original but as a standalone film, it fulfils its purpose just fine. The film isn’t particularly memorable and the scares are pretty second-rate (quiet…quiet…BANG!) but director Tom Harper sure has an eye for aesthetics here as the film is excellently shot (save for a couple of moments where it really does get a bit too dark) and as far as sequels go, this one still shows that there is some sparkle left.

Despite the scares being ultimately very second-rate, the film did keep me on the edge of my seat. Harper creates a really creepy atmosphere and the film needs to be rewarded with some excellent scares, but it just never happens and every single scare is either a rehash from another horror film or it’s something as trivial as a bird bashing into a window. The audience deserve a pay-off and every single creepy moment just ultimately falls flat. There is plenty of room for some really spine-tingling, effective scares but the film just goes with the usual claptrap which is a really big shame. The first film relied on jump scares as well but there were ultimately a couple of really chilling scares in it and what this film also lacks is a sense of suspense which the first film masterfully did. What’s especially baffling is that whenever there is a close-up of the Woman in Black, she actually looks almost pantomime-like which is a real shame and really detracts from the film. The make-up of her in the first film was very sinister and the couple of times that there was a close-up of her really managed to jolt the audience. Here it’s the other way round.

What the film also lacks is an exciting cast – Phoebe Fox, Helen McCrory and Jeremy Irvine (who plays the dashing love interest for Fox’s character) are fine, but a really good performance from a well-known actor would really have elevated this film. In the first film, there was Daniel Radcliffe who was excellent in his mature post-Harry Potter first role and even Ciaran Hinds and Janet McTeer did a decent job too. This just doesn’t happen from any of the cast here and an exciting cast could definitely have helped the film move up a tier.

The cinematography however is beautiful and the film is very aesthetically astute. The look of the film is very bleak, sombre and really fits in well with the Second World War period setting. What lets it down unfortunately are moments where the film is a bit too dark and the details are quite hard to pick out. The use of all the devilish ornaments scattered around the house are effective too and really help to conjure up a creepy atmosphere.

Overall, ‘The Woman In Black: Angel Of Death’ is an inferior horror sequel to its original, but in terms of how sequels go, it’s a perfectly fine one. It manages to create a creepy atmosphere but the scares are unfortunately very weak. The cinematography is a plus though and the fact that stylistically, it can just about hold up to the excellent cinematography of the first film is of merit. But as Arthur Kipps says at the end of the original novel, “They have asked for my story. I have told it. Enough.”

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

2015 Films To Look Out For!

Uncategorized

Another year of film has passed and a new year beckons, but before we get stuck in to 2015, let’s take a look at what films 2015 has to offer! As usual, we have our fair share of sequels and the new beginnings of franchises, but there are also some interesting original films that look appetising. Here are I take a look at my most anticipated films of the year:

So starting in January, we have a lot of the Awards Contenders – ‘Birdman’, ‘The Theory Of Everything’, ‘Whiplash’, ‘American Sniper’, ‘Wild’, ‘A Most Violent Year’, ‘Inherent Vice’, ‘Big Hero 6’ and ‘Selma’, but the one that stands out the most to me is without a doubt, ‘Foxcatcher’. It has rave reviews and the trailers look fantastic – a very slow, brooding picture filled with excellent performances from the film’s main cast – Steve Carrell, Channing Tatum and Mark Ruffalo. If you heard these names in a cast (well, maybe not Mark Ruffalo), you’d be stunned to hear that they’re in an Awards contender. This is definitely one to watch!

There are also some non-awards contenders coming out in January and the standouts are ‘The Woman in Black: Angel of Death’, ‘Taken 3’ and ‘Mortdecai’. I LOVED the 2012 adaptation of Susan Hill’s ‘The Woman in Black’ and it was my favourite film of that year. It was dark, suspenseful and very atmospheric and Daniel Radcliffe had really matured in such a short amount of time from the final Harry Potter the previous Summer. I’m a little bit worried about the sequel as the first film ended beautifully and there hasn’t been a demand for it at all. This looks like a cash grab from Hammer, but I’ll reserve full judgement until seeing the actual film.

‘Taken 3’ is another interesting film as it deviates from the standard formula that these films are based on, someone being kidnapped. Here Bryan Mills is on the run for a murder that he supposedly did not commit. I’ll be interested to see how this one gets received considering the 2nd one was critically panned (I thought it was just alright) and considering they’re changing the formula, it’ll be interesting to see if the film can still be as entertaining as the first two.

‘Mortdecai’ is a very strange case as I didn’t hear of it until watching the sublime first trailer which looked quite funny. It essentially looks like a new take on last year’s critical darling ‘The Grand Budapest Hotel’ this time with Johnny Depp as the leading man. Will it be a redeeming film for Depp after he’s suffered negatively received ‘Transcendence’ (which I really liked) or ‘The Lone Ranger’? We’ll have to wait and see.

Moving on into February, we have ‘Jupiter Ascending’ by the Wachowski’s where we’ll find out if they’ve still got it or not after a number of disappointing features. Their last film ‘Cloud Atlas’ was, in my opinion, ambitious but ultimately overlong and not particularly entertaining. We then have Matthew Vaughn’s, ‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’ which I’m particularly interested in as it looks like a ‘Kick-Ass’ version of a James Bond film. With Vaughn, I’ll be surprised if it doesn’t hold up to his reputation of consistently making good films and this should be good fun to watch.

How can I not talk about ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’? Well, I’m not particularly enthused by it, but it’s definitely a prominent film this year. Will it hold up to the bestselling novel or will it be another weak adaptation of a novel?

In to March, we have ‘The Second Best Exotic Marigold Hotel’ which its predecessor, I thought was a light and touching film so I’ll be watching this and then, a very interesting concept in the form of ‘Chappie’ by Neill Blomkamp, director of ‘District 9’. Whilst the critics were mixed over his follow-up of ‘Elysium’, I thought there were a lot of interesting concepts despite it being a very flawed film, but this looks like an adult’s version of ‘Wall-E’ that has a good cast with Hugh Jackman leading and of course, Sharlto Copley (a Blomkamp regular) is voicing the robot itself.

I won’t be watching ‘The Divergent Series: Insurgent’ because I thought the first film was rubbish, but I feel that I should mention it as there will no doubt be an audience (mainly in the form of teen girls) for this.

Whilst there are not a lot of details yet for ‘Child 44’, it intrigues me with its stellar cast which includes Tom Hardy, Noomi Rapace, Joel Kinnaman, Gary Oldman, Dev Patel, Jason Clarke and Vincent Cassel. Hopefully we’ll get a trailer shortly to confirm that this is a film worth the watch as it’s got a very strong cast.

And now we get the big blockbuster – ‘The Avengers: Age of Ultron’, the hotly anticipated follow-up in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Even though it was flawed, I still like the first entry and with all the build-up to this chapter from ‘Iron Man 3’, ‘Thor: The Dark World’, ‘Captain America: The Winter Soldier’ and ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’, this is a film not to be missed.

Just glossing over, ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’, ‘Tomorrowland’ and ‘Jurassic World’ are the next blockbusters, but it’s ‘Insidious: Chapter 3’ that I’m personally really looking forward to. With James Wan stepping down from the director’s chair, Leigh Whannell, his partner with ‘Saw’ and screenwriter for most of his films, it’ll be interesting to see if Whannell can pull it off and interesting to where he takes the story to.

I’ll be watching ‘Terminator: Genisys’, the fifth entry into the franchise and Arnie himself is returning to the franchise after sitting out of the fourth instalment. The trailer for this looked a bit puzzling, with sub-par visual effects (probably because they’re not finished yet) and a bit of a cliched story, but I’m still going to give it a chance and see if Alan Taylor (director) can pull it off.

‘Ant-Man’ and ‘The Fantastic Four’ are the other two offerings we have this year in terms of superhero films. To me, ‘Ant-Man’ intrigues me more, but it has had a very troubled production with the loss of director Edgar Wright and many cast and crew members, so it’ll be interesting to see if Marvel can have another hit especially after last year’s ‘Captain America: The Winter Soldier’ and ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’.

It’s a return from Pixar this year as well who have two films to make up for an empty year last year. In the Summer, we have ‘Inside Out’, a film that takes place in the mind of a little girl and is directed by Pete Docter, who made ‘Monsters Inc’ and ‘Up’, the latter in my opinion was an exceptional film. In the Winter, Pixar are releasing ‘The Good Dinosaur’ which had a very troubled production with the loss of its director Bob Peterson, but it’ll be interesting to see what Pixar can make of this.

‘Pan’ and ‘Assassin’s Creed’ round off the Summer and these two films are also going to be quite a gamble, especially with ‘Assassins’s Creed’ which has a very big fan base.

Moving into the late part of 2015, in September, we have ‘Suffragette’ and ‘Everest’, ‘Suffragette’ being a historical film of the suffragette movement and stars Helena Bonham Carter and Meryl Streep and ‘Everest’ is the next film for Jake Gyllenhaal to play in, who has made some excellent films lately with ‘Nightcrawler’, ‘Enemy’ and the terrific ‘Prisoners’. The latter two films are directed by Denis Villeneuve who also has a film called ‘Sicario’ coming out this year, but it has an unconfirmed release date. Details of the plot are quite scarce at the moment but it stars Emily Blunt, Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro so with this great cast, it’s got to be good!

And now for the usual Halloween fare, this year we have ‘Victor Frankenstein’, ‘Crimson Peak’ and the remake of ‘Poltergeist’. ‘Crimson Peak’ looks the best out of the three and is directed by Guillermo Del Toro, so expect a very Del-Toro-esque style and also we probably won’t see any of his creative monsters this time as this is a gothic, supernatural horror – simple, but if done correctly, it could be another great film to add to Del Toro’s repertoire.

Jon Favreau’s vision of ‘The Jungle Book’ is out in October as well, the first of two visions, the next one being an origins story by Andy Serkis which is out in 2017.

The new James Bond film ‘Spectre’ is also coming out and after the heels of ‘Skyfall’, this should be a very good film now that we have our new M, Q and Moneypenny and with rumours of Christoph Waltz playing arch-nemesis Blofeld, this is too irresistible to miss.

The final Hunger Games film ‘Mockingjay Part 2’ is out in November and this should hopefully round the series off nicely and pay off all the build up in the below-par first part.

Then we have the very hotly-anticipated ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’. I’m not a particular fan of ‘Star Wars’ myself but I know there is a huge fan base for this, so I’m sure it’ll be a good film for the fans. ‘Kung-Fu Panda 3’ rounds off the year and I’m a fan of the first two which are good fun and quite humorous.

So 2015 looks like quite a monumental year for film, with lots of sequels and big franchise films on the horizon. There are also a lot of original films coming out (and plenty more as the year rolls on) so for those disappointed at the ton of sequels this year, there’s something for everyone. I’m sure it’ll be a very interesting year for film.

About The Film Meister

About
Oscar Huckle portrait

I’m Oscar Huckle and I’ve been an avid cinephile since before my teenage years.

You’ll regularly find me at the cinema catching anything from the latest blockbuster to hunting out smaller-budget arthouse fare. Some of my favourite films include Inception, Up, The Hateful Eight and In Bruges.

I’m known for my controversial, but articulate opinions – for example, I consider Prometheus to be the best Alien film and Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom the highlight of its series. 

I hold a BA English Literature and Film Studies degree from the University of East Anglia. For my dissertation, I researched the revival of the contemporary Hollywood Western through theories of genre and authorship. I also contributed many film reviews and features to the university’s Concrete student newspaper. 

I originally started The Film Meister in 2015 and to this day, continue to regularly update the site with the latest reviews and features. Please note I stick to the UK release date calendar from 1st January to 31st December – so for example, if you find a film features in an end-of-year list that was recognised in the previous year’s Awards ceremonies, that will be because it released in the UK in that respective year. 

Outside of film, I’m a keen traveller and a passionate cyclist – don’t ask how that’s related to film! I’ve forged a career in the cycling industry as a journalist and you’ll find my work published on BikeRadar.com, Cycling Plus and MBUK magazines, as well as The Cycling Meister

To keep up to date with my work, or to get in contact with me, you can find me on the following platforms: