High-Rise (Review)

Uncategorized
maxresdefault1

⭐⭐ (Poor)

Director: Ben Wheatley 
Starring: Tom Hiddleston, Jeremy Irons, Sienna Miller, Luke Evans, Elisabeth Moss
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 119 mins

‘High-Rise’ is an adaptation of the same novel by J.G Ballard that has been deemed “unfilmbable”. It’s faced a long history of being brought to the screen since the 1970’s when producer Jeremy Thomas tried to get the film made with Nicolas Roeg directing but it could never lift off the ground. Finally in 2013 after a few more efforts, Ben Wheatley, most famous for ‘Kill List’ and ‘Sightseers’, stepped into the director’s chair with his wife, Amy Jump, adapting the book into a script. This is Wheatley’s largest budget film to date and his direction doesn’t always appeal to mass audiences. The film has received rather polarising reviews with some labelling it as a masterpiece to some downright hating it.

‘High-Rise’ starts off well enough and has an intriguing premise but the film descends into an indecipherable mess that is poorly handled by Wheatley who doesn’t seem to have a firm-enough grasp on the material. There are also some excellent performances here from Tom Hiddleston and Elisabeth Moss  but it’s not enough to save this hodgepodge of a film. Any tension built up towards the film’s climactic third act is lost and the film becomes very dull. Hats off to Wheatley for giving this a go but this ‘Lord of the Flies’ meets ‘Ex_Machina’ mash-up unfortunately doesn’t meet the bill.

The cast is a mixed bag – Tom Hiddleston and Elisabeth Moss are the standouts here, particularly Hiddleston who owns the role as the lead character, Laing. He is really turning into one of Great Britain’s national treasures when it comes to acting. Laing is constantly kept in the dark as to what the true intentions of his fellow neighbours in the high-rise are up to and as an audience, it is interesting to see his character develop and ultimately morph into a figure who suits this high-rise life. Elisabeth Moss is also very good here in a supporting role as a pregnant neighbour who is quite vulnerable and doesn’t quite know how to tread around her husband. Luke Evans who plays him is downright awful here and his character seems wildly out of place here and is annoying and animalistic. Jeremy Irons and Sienna Miller round off the main cast and both are sound.

The story details an almost Marxist, volatile environment that crumbles during the course of the film. It does have the potential to be a really interesting film but Wheatley cannot deliver on the tension-building first act and the film turns into an indecipherable mess as it comes to its final act. It drags on and on (the film is only 119 minutes though) and this lack of tension results in some dull stretches. Even the Clint Mansell score, which is one of the highlights of the film, cannot save it nor can the stellar cinematography by Laurie Rose.

It’s a real shame that ‘High-Rise’ isn’t as good as it should be as the material has the potential to make an interesting, moral-questioning watch but Wheatley just doesn’t seem to have a firm grasp on the material. The film is ultimately extremely dull in parts, especially in its overlong final act. However, ‘High-Rise’ is not a totally wasted experience as the performances by Tom Hiddleston and Elisabeth Moss are excellent here as is the cinematography and score and the film’s promising first act.

⭐⭐ (Poor)

Grimsby (Review)

Uncategorized
1272574 - Grimsby

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Director: Louis Leterrier
Starring: Sacha Baron Cohen, Mark Strong, Isla Fisher, Rebel Wilson, Gabourey Sidibe, Annabelle Wallis, Ian McShane, Penélope Cruz
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 83 mins

Carl Allen “Nobby” Butcher, is the latest creation of comedy genius Sacha Baron Cohen in ‘Grimsby’ (otherwise known as ‘The Brothers Grimsby’ in America), the man behind Ali G, Borat, Brüno and General Aladeen. This time he plays a football hooligan with multiple kids living in the seaside town of Grimsby who tracks down his brother who is a spy for MI5. The actual town of Grimsby is very negatively portrayed in the film and has caused controversy. The film is directed by Louis Leterrier who has a very patchy track record with his films – he has directed the first two instalments of ‘The Transporter’ series which was poor and then ‘The Incredible Hulk’, ‘Clash of the Titans’ and ‘Now You See Me’ all of which were well-intentioned but very flawed. So to have Leterrier directing someone as talented as Sacha Baron Cohen in a comedy which he has never tackled before causes very mixed feelings.

‘Grimsby’ is one of the best comedies of the decade – it is consistently hilarious (although quite vulgar in parts) and the cast are wonderful, in particular the two leads, Sacha Baron Cohen and Mark Strong, who displays a real panache for comedic roles. Louis Leterrier has really developed as a director and seems to have a flair for comedy.  However, the only criticism is that Leterrier still cannot quite grasp how to direct an action scene and this is a recurring theme in all of his films. It’s a real shame how this film has been almost completely misunderstood and has garnered rather mixed reviews.

‘Grimsby’ boasts a strong cast, particularly with the duo of Sacha Baron Cohen and Mark Strong who really elevate the film. One would expect Sacha Baron Cohen to pull off comedic roles as this is what he is most famous for and ‘Nobby’ is another ingenious creation to add to his repertoire but equally as impressive is Mark Strong who is fantastic here. He displayed a comedic side in last years, ‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’ which he was excellent in too and he emulates his success here.  The rest of the cast are rounded out by talents such as Isla Fisher, Rebel Wilson, Gabourey Sidibe, Annabelle Wallis, Ian McShane and Penélope Cruz who are all sound but this film really does belong to the main duo.

The film is consistently funny from beginning to end which is very rare for a comedy film which generally tend to lose steam at some point. ‘Grimsby’ is one of those rare films that bucks this trend and one has to admire it in this respect. The ‘British’ humour works best and the film can be quite vulgar at times but what ruined Baron Cohen’s previous works was the fact that the humour overstepped the mark and was consistently crude. A lot of the success here is down to the script penned by Baron Cohen and Phil Johnston who both seem to have a love of this story and the script feels very refined and polished with humour constantly thrown into the mix.

‘Grimsby’ has also got a great heart to it as well which adds another dimension to this film and really elevates its quality. Not many comedies can balance comedy and emotion and this manages to handle this very assuredly. There are many flashback sequences that delve into the disturbed childhood of the main characters that are wonderful to watch on-screen as it really develops the characters and allows the audience to really feel for them.

However, one of the only criticisms that I have of ‘Grimsby’ is Leterrier’s ability to craft action sequences. Leterrier resorts to using ‘shaky-cam’ which make some of the action incomprehensible to interpret on-screen rather than using slightly longer shots to detail the action. This is also true in his other films and with all the character development and humour, this does unfortunately let it down a little bit. Part of this is down to cinematographer, Oliver Wood who takes a mis-step here as he is capable of greatness as he shot ‘The Bourne Ultimatum’ which had enthralling action sequences.

Overall, ‘Grimsby’ is an excellent film that is consistently funny and is one of the very best comedies of the decade so far. Sacha Baron Cohen and Mark Strong are a perfect match and both manage to pull off their roles extremely well and the film’s heart really manages to elevate its status.  It is, in my opinion, Sacha Baron Cohen’s best work but the reviews for this film have been very mixed which I find quite hard to understand.  It would seem that audiences tend to prefer the more crude humour that Baron Cohen is capable of. That said, the entire audience in my screening were all laughing from start to finish which is testament to the quality of the film. An excellent effort from all involved.

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Hail, Caesar! (Review)

Uncategorized

 

thumbnail_23310

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

Director: Joel & Ethan Coen
Starring: Josh Brolin, George Clooney, Alden Ehrenreich, Ralph Fiennes, Jonah Hill, Scarlett Johansson, Frances McDormand, Tilda Swinton, Channing Tatum
Certificate: 12A
Run Time: 108 mins

Originally conceived in 2004, ’Hail, Caesar!’ is the latest film directed by the zany auteurs, the Coen Brothers behind hits such as ‘Fargo’, ‘The Big Lebowski’ and ‘No Country For Old Men’. It tells the story of a ‘fixer’ Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin) who is working for Capitol Pictures, a film studio in the 1950’s who is trying to deal with the abduction of a cast member, Baird Whitlock (George Clooney) who disappears during filming. Unfortunately, the film was shelved until 2013 when the Coens picked it back up again after finishing on the stellar, ‘Inside Llewyn Davis’. Critics have generally reacted positively to the film whereas audiences have been very mixed in their opinions. So do the Coens manage to continue their winning streak or is it a disappointment?

‘Hail, Caesar!’ is usual business for the Coen Brothers – they have crafted a smart and fascinating study into the film industry model and the film features some fantastic performances of the Coens’ typically quirky character creations. It brings out some of the Coen’s best qualities but they do also fall into a couple of bad habits, namely going off on a couple of completely unnecessary narrative diversions. That said, it is very easy to see why ‘Hail, Caesar!’ has been polarising to say the least. It is a film that requires multiple viewings and almost certainly a subsequent reassessment and I’m still not sure if the film’s message is genius or irrelevant. It is the ‘Inherent Vice’ of 2016.

One of the Coens’ main strengths and why one would go and watch one of their films is their ability to create vivid and quirky characters. The film really does belong to Josh Brolin and George Clooney who both are wonderful here and are given the most material to contend with. Josh Brolin, in particular, has had a brilliant year and has given good performances in films such as ‘Everest’ and ‘Sicario’.  Newcomer Alden Ehrenreich really shines here and is a talent to watch out for – the Coens’ were able to spot talent in him by casting him in a significant role here and it’s paid off. The rest of the cast aren’t given particularly much to do but Ralph Fiennes, Frances McDormand and Channing Tatum are fantastic, despite only being in a handful of scenes. Ralph Fiennes, still relatively hot off ‘The Grand Budapest Hotel’ continues to demonstrate a real flair for comedy and there is a particularly funny, typically Coen-like moment in the film where there is an encounter between Fiennes and Ehrenreich. Channing Tatum continues to redesign himself from the actor who would give mediocre performances in very mediocre films to someone who has really upped his game. This, in combination with his dark turn in Quentin Tarantino’s, ‘The Hateful Eight’ earlier on in the year is proof of this. He clearly seems to be a winner with what are regarded as some of the top directors in the industry. Finally, Frances McDormand (who is the wife of Joel Coen) has one scene and her portrayal is satirical, yet resemblant of this period in Hollywood cinema.

As for the Coen’s direction, they are at the top of their game in places and there are many standout sequences which demonstrate their ability. A scene early in the film details Brolin’s character discussing the religious accuracy of the portrayal of Jesus’ run-up to his crucifixion and it’s so typically Coen-like and very smartly crafted. Another standout sequence is an encounter between Ehrenreich and Fiennes which again is genius. This is what the Coen’s are best at, crafting standalone sequences that are very intelligently crafted yet a little odd. Perhaps the reason why ‘Hail, Caesar!’ hasn’t appealed to audiences as much as it has to critics is that their intelligence and carefully constructed references to other films, both historical and their own is a little too much for some audience’s grasp. That’s not to say that audiences are stupid, but in order to fully appreciate this film, you need to have a love for cinema and have some background knowledge. This film is ultimately the Coen’s love letter to cinema.

However, the Coen’s continue with their bad habit of pursuing narratives that divert from the main story and ultimately detract the audience from the film. In, ‘Hail, Caesar!’, this unfortunately happens too often particularly within the middle of the film where the Coen’s can’t quite decide what direction to take the unfolding narrative in. Now this mistake isn’t too detrimental as it can be in some of their other works but it’s what prevents the film from being brilliant as there are too many dull moments mixed in with the genius that the Coen’s are capable of. This also could be why audiences have had mixed reactions to the film.

From a technical standpoint, Roger Deakins’ cinematography is stellar as usual and here, chooses to use stock film as opposed to digital to compliment the Coen’s vision. Deakins even revealed he would shoot on an iPhone if that’s how a film would look best. Roger Deakins is a cinematographer who always has a unique vision and understands how to shoot a film so it would be interesting if he ever did decide to shoot a film on an iPhone. Carter Burwell’s score is sound and is used fairly sparingly as the film is very dialogue-heavy.

Overall, ‘Hail, Caesar’ is a fascinating and satirical deconstruction into the Coen’s viewpoint of how the Hollywood studio model worked in its Golden Age and is important in how the film industry continues to function in the present day. It demonstrates a lot of the Coen’s best traits but unfortunately, the narrative does divert a little unnecessarily at times. The acting here is generally superb despite several prolific actors being sidelined and Roger Deakins continues to prove why he is one of the best cinematographers in the film industry. However, it’s very easy to see why the reception to this film has been mixed by some and it’s a film that requires several re-watches and is a film that will almost certainly require further reassessment in the future. But for a Coen Brothers film, it’s very entertaining and intelligent film but its narrative does sometimes goes off the rails.

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

Spotlight (Review)

Uncategorized
spotlight1

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Director: Tom McCarthy
Starring: Mark Ruffalo, Michael Keaton, Rachel McAdams, Liev Schreiber, John Slattery, Brian D’Arcy James, Billy Crudup, Stanley Tucci
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 129 mins

‘Spotlight’ is a drama film that delves into the true story of how the Boston Globe’s, ‘Spotlight’ team uncovered the massive scandal of child molestation by Roman Catholic priests and cover-up within the Catholic church. It is directed by Tom McCarthy, a very versatile individual who is best known for directing ‘The Station Agent’ and ‘The Visitor’ , co-writing Disney Pixar’s, ‘Up’ and taking small roles in films from time to time. However a big mis-step for him was directing ‘The Cobbler’ with Adam Sandler which came out earlier in the year and is universally agreed as one of the worst films of the year. Anyway, McCarthy is finally getting recognised for his work with this film which has impressed critics and audiences alike. It is one of the frontrunners to win the coveted Best Picture Academy Award but ‘The Revenant’ will probably pip it to the post.

‘Spotlight’ is an excellent film and really showcases the best in Tom McCathy from his close direction to the excellent, tightly-packed script. The cast are wonderful and it manages to deal with such a sensitive subject matter in a very entertaining and satisfying fashion and once it gets going after establishing a context, it rip-roars right through to the end. However, my only criticism is that it doesn’t do a lot to set itself apart from other films of this genre. It follows the tried-and-tested formula all the way, as entertaining and satisfying as it is.

The acting ensemble is where ‘Spotlight’ excels at – there is not one bad performance here. Mark Ruffalo and Rachel McAdams are the standouts here, the latter a career-best, and consequently both have received Academy Award nominations. Michael Keaton, Brian D’Arcy James and Stanley Tucci are also very good here and Liev Schreiber gives one of his best performances in years despite his role being quite a small one.

The story is particularly powerful and thanks to the cast, are able to convey the shock and betrayal that they feel. There is a particularly powerful scene about half-way into the film when the team uncovers information that this has gone on for years and the shock that they feel is so realistic and we too, as an audience, can empathise. McCarthy does seem to restrain himself with the script as there are so many instances where he could dig into the incompetence of the Catholic Church but always holds himself back – this is a film that just wants to lay the facts out. However, whilst the main ensemble are very well developed, the victims and Priests themselves are rather underdeveloped and I think if McCarthy had chosen to flesh out these characters a little more, it would have made the film more satisfying.

Howard Shore’s score for the film is one of his best in a long time and Masanobu Takayanagi’s cinematography adds another credit to his repertoire after also doing a good job of Scott Cooper’s, ‘Out of the Furnace’ and ‘Black Mass’. Takayanagi uses lots of white and grey to portray Boston, perhaps juxtaposing the innocent white with the increasing guilt that the investigators feel from the Catholic Church covering everything up.

Although ‘Spotlight’ doesn’t break any new ground as a film, it is still an enthralling and totally engaging watch once it gets going, thanks to its fine performances and assured direction. Whilst Ruffalo and McAdams have landed Acting nominations, I don’t think they will win them as their performances haven’t been singled out so much compared to others but the film does have a shot at success for its fantastic screenplay. ‘Spotlight’ could also very well end up being the film that takes the Best Picture Academy Award and if it does, I will have no complaints at all. A very good effort from all involved.

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Deadpool (Review)

Uncategorized
deadpool-gallery-03-gallery-image

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

Director: Tim Miller
Starring: Ryan Reynolds, Morena Baccarin, Ed Skrein, T. J. Miller, Gina Carano, Brianna Hildebrand, Stefan Kapičić
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 108 mins

‘Deadpool’ has been in the pipeline for years and fans have wanted this popular, adult comic book anti-hero to star in his own film for a very long time. Ryan Reynolds first appeared as the titular character in the 2009 spin-off, ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’ which ended up being negatively recieved (I quite liked it) and completely botched the character of Deadpool. There is even a gag in the film that references his poor treatment in that film. Here, Marvel have given the character an R / 15 rated treatment with all the bad language and over-the-top violence that is present in the comics. Tim Miller, who previously specialised in visual effects, is in the director’s chair here and the test footage of an action sequence that he created was positively received when it was leaked in the Summer of 2014. Fox gave the film the go-ahead, albeit with a $58 million budget. So with a modest budget and equipped with an R / 15 rating, is this adaptation the definitive one or is it style over substance?

‘Deadpool’ is unfortunately a bit of a disappointment given the hype it has recieved but individual set pieces and sequences are absolutely fantastic. Ryan Reynolds is also perfect in the role. It does suffer from a low budget and tonally, it can be quite obnoxious in parts. The humour is also quite primitive given the directions that they could have gone in although I do admit that I did chuckle a few times. Fox also heavy-handedly promote their X-Men universe to the point where it feels that is being rammed down the audience’s throat which is a shame. It would be great to see Deadpool team up with his X-Men counterparts but a constant reminder that this is happening shouldn’t occur. The film is also so focussed with lambasting every other comic book film that exists that it falls into conventionality, particularly the third act. Now all this would seem negative – there is a lot to like in this film but it is also deeply flawed.

Ryan Reynolds completely owns the role and brings a lot of charisma and wit to the role, despite the flawed screenplay. His character often breaks the fourth wall (or as Deadpool would argue, the 16th) and the audience are often subjected to hearing his thoughts, which works. Unfortunately the rest of cast are average at best. Ed Skrein, who plays the villain, Ajax is ok – the torture sequences in particular although overlong really get to bring out his sadistic nature but unfortunately his character often gets sidelined which means that his character is never developed enough for the audience to care. Morena Baccarin is weak as the love interest and Stefan Kapičić in particular, is awful as Colossus, replacing Daniel Cudmore who played the character in the earlier X-Men films.

The story is also too simplistic – its origin story is overlong and makes up the bulk of the film. The film’s third act also slides into conventionality with a third-rate low budget action sequence which the film actively tries to go against in its first and second acts. That said, the first action sequence which begins right from the start is incredible – this is the film Deadpool deserves, not the one that follows!

The humour is also rather primitive and not particularly creative. Most of the gags are exactly what one would expect but there are probably 6 or 7 that I chuckled at. But even then, the humour is hardly ever intelligent. The soundtrack provided by Junkie XL works in parts but sometimes feels aggressively out of place.

Overall, ‘Deadpool’ is a sound adaptation of the comic book anti-hero. Although its humour is primitive, I did still chuckle in parts and Ryan Reynolds is perfect for the role. With the character being developed, a sequel should hopefully be much better. A sequel would benefit from different screenwriters though who are willing to be more inventive. The film, despite being flawed, is an important film for the industry – the fact that Marvel had the confidence to give a film an R / 15 rating is promising, although there are bound to be a couple of ‘copycat’ films that try to implore this but fail. That said, the thought of an R / 15 rated ‘Wolverine’ film to close the triolgy has the potential to be absolutely incredible as this is what the character deserves. But for ‘Deadpool’, the film is deeply flawed but still makes for an overall entertaining watch.

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

The Big Short (Review)

Uncategorized
1401x788-bgs-02959r__

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

Director: Adam McKay
Starring: Christian Bale, Steve Carrell, Ryan Gosling, Brad Pitt 
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 130 mins

‘The Big Short’ is director Adam McKay’s first venture out of the comedy genre and he is behind hits such as both ‘Anchorman’ films, ‘Talladega Nights’ and ‘The Other Guys’ for example. Whilst these films told the stories of chauvinistic newsreaders to immature adults, ‘The Big Short’ deals with entirely different characters, stockbrokers who bet that America will collapse into a housing crisis. The film has been nominated for multiple Academy Awards including Best Picture and Adam McKay has risen to God-status and will almost certainly be given creative freedom to make whatever film he wants.

‘The Big Short’ is a mixed bag – it is very original and has many flashes of sheer brilliance. There are some fantastic performances and McKay’s ideas are admirable. However, on the flipside, it comes off as incredibly smug and boisterous at times and it has a big identity crisis tonally. McKay isn’t quite sure what the film wants to be – at times it feels like a knock-off of ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ and at other times, he regresses to his comedic roots. This deeply impacts the film as tonally it feels very disjointed and feels more like a collection of scenes (some outstanding) spliced together rather than a feature length film. However, originality is what is to be admired here despite the film not hitting all the right notes.

What McKay has tried to do here is attempt to combine a very satirical black portrayal of the American housing crisis with humour. In order for the audience to keep up and understand, there are several scenes which contain celebrity cameos for example Selena Gomez and Margot Robbie who define economic terms that audiences may not be familiar with. It comes off as very ‘Wolf of Wall Street’-esque at times and sometimes the film is just aggressively unfunny and smug. This makes for a very disjointed watch and whilst individual set pieces work, the film never comes together as a whole.

The story is absolutely shocking and McKay paints a very negative and cynical portrayal of America. Some of the characters in the film are outright despicable and it is hard to support them and audiences question their morals . McKay pulls on the heartstrings faintly at one point where we see one family being made homeless, but it’s never dwelled upon enough for the audience to care more. If the film were to show just how much of an impact this crisis had, the audience would be able to empathise more on a human level. A film that does this very well is the recent ’99 Homes’ and if this film had dwelled upon the effects more, it would be so much better.

In terms of the performances, Christian Bale and Steve Carrell are the standouts, Bale in particular is an oddball of a character and he never shares scenes with the rest of the main cast. It’s a completely different role to what Bale has done before and it comes off as refreshing and innovative. Steve Carrell proves that he can be a serious actor and this is another worthy portrayal after his sinister turn in last year’s ‘Foxcatcher’. Ryan Gosling is also pretty good here but his character isn’t as well handled as the other two and Brad Pitt is fine in more of a cameo as opposed to a leading role.

Overall, ‘The Big Short’ is a challenging watch and is ultimately, disappointing but the concepts and intentions behind it are what should be applauded. This film does not deserve all the nominations and praise it is getting as it just isn’t good enough. It is one of the weakest of this year’s Oscar crop. However, when the film manages to find itself, it’s outstanding and the films standout performances from Christian Bale and Steve Carrell allow this film to be a worthwhile opportunity overall.

⭐⭐⭐ (Good)

The Revenant (Review)

Uncategorized
leonardo-dicaprio-the-revenant-trailer-inarritu-071715

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Director: Alejandro González Iñárritu
Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Tom Hardy, Domhnall Gleeson, Will Poulter, Forrest Goodluck, Paul Anderson 
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 156 mins

After striking gold at the Academy Awards last year with ‘Birdman’, Alejandro González Iñárritu is back with ‘The Revenant’, a tale of revenge and suffering. ‘The Revenant’ has experienced a hard shoot, Iñárritu said it would be all well and good to film in a studio, but the film wouldn’t have the same impact. Instead, the cast and crew shot on location and experienced extreme weather conditions. This film is particularly important for Leonardo DiCaprio who is overdue for an Academy Award and should probably finally win this year. ‘The Revenant’ has received 12 Oscar nominations and is expected to win a slew of them and possibly the big awards. I found ‘Birdman’ unengaging and pretentious at times and felt in a year where there were outstanding films such as ‘Whiplash’ and particularly, ‘Boyhood’, it was a very undeserving winner.

‘The Revenant’ is a visually stunning film and it boasts many outstanding sequences. It has some excellent central performances and boasts original cinematography and an atmospheric score. Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hardy are both mesmerising here and Iñárritu has really developed as a director. The battle sequences are wonderfully crafted and there are some beautifully shot landscapes to create the film’s atmosphere. My only gripes with ‘The Revenant’ are its pacing is a little stretched at parts and its story is a little simplistic for a 156 minute running time. But the execution is where ‘The Revenant’ wows and it really is a work of art.

The acting is where ‘The Revenant’ is most likely to flourish at the Academy Awards and Leonardo DiCaprio is stunning here. DiCaprio is a fantastic actor anyway and deserved to win for ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’, only he faced some fierce competition in that year in the form of Chiwetel Ejiofor and Matthew McConaughey, the latter ultimately taking the gong. His performance in ‘The Revenant’ is a very physical one and he carries the film with just his mannerisms and pure torture that his character is put through. Tom Hardy is also very good here, perhaps not quite Oscar-worthy, but he makes for a very interesting villain. His performance too is a very physical one and his character is well-developed. The last time DiCaprio and Hardy met on-screen was in Christopher Nolan’s ‘Inception’ and they gel just as well here as they did there. The ultimate showdown between both actors in this film is breathtaking and is edge-of-the-seat entertaining. Domhnall Gleeson and Will Poulter are in supporting roles for this film and give sound performances.

Whilst the story is a rather simplistic for its lengthy run time, it is developed well enough so that one connects with the characters. This film is well-and-truly a revenge thriller first and a Western second. The suffering that DiCaprio’s character experiences is at times, shocking and he goes to any lengths to survive. The battle sequences are especially mesmerising, particularly at the very beginning and the mauling of DiCaprio by a bear is extremely well crafted and frightening.

Emmanuel Lubezki’s cinematography here is stunning and he will most likely win his third Academy Award for this. Characters are generally kept to the left side of the frame to give the audience a feel for perspective and Lubezki’s landscape shots are wonderful to behold and really bring a sense into the desperate and desolate world that one immerses themselves in. Although sadly illegible for the Academy Awards, the score by Ryuichi Sakamoto and Alva Noto here is endlessly atmospheric and heartfelt. It is used sparingly, but whenever the score is used it heightens the events being portrayed on-screen. Sakamoto has recently been battling cancer so it’s a welcome return to form here and this is his first film score for an American film in a long time.

Overall, ‘The Revenant’ is a very impressive film and technically outstanding. It makes for a very satisfying watch and the combination of DiCaprio and Hardy is a match made in heaven. Iñárritu’s direction is a lot more assured here and this is complimented by an atmospheric score and beautiful cinematography. This is a much better effort compared to ‘Birdman’ which very undeservedly took the top awards last year. If this went on to win Best Picture, I would be fairly happy. ‘Room’ is the best film of the pack but it does shut out some audiences who sadly won’t appreciate it. ‘The Revenant’ is very impressive and satisfying for those who stick with it. Watch it on the biggest screen you can find!

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Room (Review)

Uncategorized
maxresdefault

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Perfect)

Director: Lenny Abrahamson
Starring: Brie Larson, Jacob Tremblay, Joan Allen, Sean Bridgers, Tom McCamus, William H. Macy 
Certificate: 15
Run Time: 118 mins

‘Room’ is an adaptation of Emma Donoghue’s powerful Booker Prize shortlisted novel. It tells the story of Ma and Jack who are imprisoned in a garden shed but for Jack, who has never seen the outside world, this is his universe. In the director’s chair is Lenny Abrahamson who recently directed the interesting but tonally jumbled ‘Frank’. ‘Room’ is completely different territory story-wise and features a maturing Brie Larson in the lead role with child-actor Jacob Tremblay. It has received 4 Oscar nominations, including Best Picture and Best Director.

Very rarely would I say this, but ‘Room’ is a perfect film and deserves a 5 star rating. It is an inspiring watch and reaches various emotional heights. The performances from the cast all round are nothing short of incredible and Lenny Abrahamsson’s careful and assured direction works wonders. The film has a beaming heart at its core – at times the film is devastatingly sad and at others, warm and feel-good. There is never a dull moment – the film is expertly paced and takes ample time to develop its characters.

The acting is incredible. Brie Larson is perfect as Ma and commands the screen. There is a brief section in the film where she isn’t present and we are left with Jacob Tremblay’s Jack and the isolation felt as an audience member conveyed through him and the omission of Larson is testament to her performance. Jacob Tremblay’s career has really taken off thanks to this film and he is wonderful as the innocent and oblivious Jack. The chemistry between Brie Larson and Jacob Tremblay is astonishingly good. I could have watched these characters all day long and I wouldn’t have got bored of them.

Even the supporting cast manage to hold their own and Tom McCamus brings a warm heart to the screen as does Joan Allen. Sean Bridgers is plain terrifying as ‘Old Nick’ and Abrahamson’s decision to portray this character through Jack’s eyes and we witness the torture and brutality that he is capable of inflicting. William H. Macy, who is a brilliant actor, is unfortunately underused for his talents but is effective in the short scenes that he does play in. I was really hoping to see his character feature at the end but it never happens and it leaves a gaping hole in these characters’ lives and his impression to the audience. Whilst he doesn’t get to showcase his talents, it’s an important role and he fits it very well.

Both distinct halves of this story are fantastic – what the audience witness is two very different films but both are completely engaging and cinematic. A lot of this is down to Emma Donoghue’s fantastic screenplay and whilst the film does cut out some details from the book, both book and film stand extremely high in their own right. Donoghue’s screenplay is suitably devastating and humorous at times and she deserves all the praise that she has received for her efforts.

Stephen Rennicks’ score compliments the film extremely well and the cinematography by Danny Cohen is also excellent, in particular the final shot.  Both Cohen and Abrahamson have minute attention to detail and there is a sequence involving Jack’s feet that is so wonderfully executed and makes the world alien for him.

‘Room’ is a stunning and flawless piece of work. This deserves to win Best Picture at this year’s Academy Awards, but unfortunately I don’t think it will win as there will be a lot of audience members who won’t understand it. Brie Larson’s career will undoubtedly reach new heights and I hope she continues to pick the right roles and Lenny Abrahamson too has finally broken out into mainstream cinema. If I was asked to name my top 5 favourite films of the decade so far, this would definitely feature. It’s that good.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Perfect)

The Hateful Eight (Review)

Uncategorized
hateful20820sam20jackson20final

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)

Director: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: Samuel L. Jackson, Kurt Russell, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Walton Goggins, Demián Bichir, Tim Roth, Michael Madsen, Bruce Dern, James Parks, Channing Tatum
Certificate: 18
Run Time: 168 mins

‘The Hateful Eight’ is Quentin Tarantino’s eighth film and second Western after 2013’s ‘Django Unchained’ (although Tarantino calls that a ‘Southern’) that received critical acclaim. Unfortunately during the scripting process, an unfinished copy of the first draft leaked and Tarantino almost abandoned filming as he was so annoyed. Luckily, he decided to press on with the film and the script finally reached its third and final draft stage. Tarantino has assembled an impressive cast here stating that everyone is ‘equal’ so that they all have a big impact (hence why no Christoph Waltz here) and comprises of Tarantino favourites such as Samuel L. Jackson, Kurt Russell, Tim Roth and Michael Madsen to just name a few.

‘The Hateful Eight’ is another knockout from Tarantino – it’s bloody and gory, has fantastic speeches and an excellent story. It has some brilliant performances with the standouts being Samuel L. Jackson, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Tim Roth and Walton Goggins. It’s suitably gory and ramps the tension up with gusto. My only criticism is it is a little baggy and perhaps could lose 20 minutes and then the film would be leaner and more heavy-hitting. This might not be true, but it also doesn’t seem to have as much of a rewatchablity factor as perhaps some of his other films do.

The cast are undoubtedly the film’s strongest asset and if this hadn’t have been the case, the film would have made for a very boring 168 minutes. Samuel L. Jackson is incredible here and this, along with ‘Pulp Fiction’ is a career-best performance. Tarantino gives him some very memorable speeches and he looks as if he’s having barrels of fun filming this. Jennifer Jason Leigh is the only cast member to receive awards attention and she is one of the strongest cast members here – the way her character is treated evokes strong sympathy for her but when she reveals her true colours, it’s all completely justified. Walton Goggins is also another surprise standout and he also seems to have fun here and has some excellent speeches and also Tim Roth is another interesting character who has a full-on British twang.

Of the others,  Kurt Russell is on fine form and chews the scenery and for Demián Bichir, this is a career-best performance. Bruce Dern’s character is very slimy and little by little, more of his true intentions are revealed and he is excellent in the role. The only cast member who fails to make as much of an impression is Michael Madsen, mostly as he is given the least amount of material to work with but his character isn’t as well developed. Madsen is capable of great things as evident in Tarantino’s ‘Kill Bill’ two-parter but he is not as strong here. Finally, it’s a revelation to see Channing Tatum choose a role in this film which diverts from mostly comedic roles and he is very sinister here, although he isn’t a big character.

Tarantino’s story is also gripping and the whodunnit element is a new type of film for him, but he handles it with great confidence. The audience cannot trust any of the characters and characters constantly switch sides. Tarantino hopes to turn this into a play and I have full confidence that this would be successful as the film is very much like a play and with such strong characters and a gripping story, this would easily establish Tarantino into another platform.

Robert Richardson’s cinematography is outstanding and there is a clear contrast between the cold, harsh snow landscape and the cosy yet impending violence in Minnie’s Haberdashery. Even inside Minnie’s Haberdashery, there is a constant presence of the cold wind breathing on the back of these characters. Ennio Morricone’s score is also wonderful and fully deserving of all the Awards attention it is getting.

‘The Hateful Eight’ is another film to add to Quentin Tarantino’s repertoire. It is a fantastically crafted film that has strong performances from its cast and a gripping story. It’s not quite his best film, but it would rank pretty highly in his filmography. As to the film’s Oscar prospectives, I would say there is a low chance of it being nominated in the Best Picture category. Certain elements of the film such as its editing and treatment of women have been controversial amongst critics and I don’t think the Academy will nominate it for these reasons. But as a film, Tarantino has done a brilliant job here and with a slightly more ruthless editor, this would be a 5-star film.

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)