The Secret Agent (Review)

Review
Still from 'The Secret Agent'

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

Director: Kleber Mendonça Filho
Starring: Wagner Moura, Carlos Francisco, Tânia Maria, Robério Diógenes, Alice Carvalho, Gabriel Leone, Maria Fernanda Cândido, Hermila Guedes, Isabél Zuaa, Udo Kier
Certificate: 15

Run Time: 161 mins

The Secret Agent is a historical political thriller directed by Kleber Mendonça Filho that’s received quite the buzz at this year’s Academy Awards, including a Best Picture nomination. The film stars Wagner Moura as a man we’re first introduced to as Marcelo Alves, who’s travelling to Recife (which happens to be the director’s hometown) in his yellow Volkswagen Beetle to seek refuge during the 1977 Carnival – during the political turmoil of the Brazilian military dictatorship. Slowly but surely, The Secret Agent reveals its hand as to who Moura’s character really is and why he’s ended up in this tension-fuelled city. It’s interesting that this is the second film in the space of a year to explore the same point in history, with Walter Salles’s hypnotic I’m Still Here landing a Best Picture nomination just last year.

Although ramshackle in its construction, The Secret Agent is a powerful film with an outstanding central performance from Wagner Moura. It’s particularly period-appropriate in its sun-dried setting and rich characters from the warm refugees Marcelo shares a block of flats with (run by Dona Sebastiana, in an endlessly charismatic performance by Tânia Maria). From the gripping opening scene, human life is treated as expendable as Marcelo fills his car up at a petrol station where a fly-encrusted corpse is rotting in the corner, and when the police turn up, they’re more interested in finding something wrong with his car than they are about the casualty – death is simply a way of life. Even more impressive is how Filho contrasts these realistic skits with surreal images, such as a symbolic severed leg.

As well as Moura’s effortlessly likeable performance, he’s surrounded by a superb supporting cast. Carlos Francisco is superb as Marcelos’ projectionist father-in-law, as is Robério Diógenes as the diabolical police chief Euclides. Gabriel Leone and Roney Villela are terrific as two hitmen who are hot on Marcelo’s trail, as is Kaiony Venâncio as an impoverished gunman. Technically, the film’s sumptuously shot by Evgenia Alexandrova and although tonally all over the place, the score by Tomaz Alves Souza and Mateus Alves soars in the third act, especially in a monumental chase sequence.

Although unconventional in its storytelling, if you can get on board with The Secret Agent and have patience with its themes that may at first seem arbitrary, it’s an enriching experience that’s profound in its exploration of this dark age of Brazilian history. It won’t be for everyone, but this is fearsomely original filmmaking with a brilliant Wagner Moura performance that deftly balances warm characters, surrealism and emotional poignancy – once you get past the somewhat disjointed first half.

Crime 101 (Review)

Review
Still from 'Crime 101'

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Director: Bart Layton
Starring: Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo, Barry Keoghan, Monica Barbaro, Corey Hawkins, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Nick Nolte, Halle Berry
Certificate: 15

Run Time: 140 mins

Crime 101 is the new Bart Layton film, who last directed the excellent American Animals all the way back in 2018. Staying in the heist film genre, Crime 101 stars Chris Hemsworth as an elusive jewel thief, who skilfully plans violence-free robberies while escaping via the 101 Freeway in Southern California. When a job that goes wrong shakes him up, he calls off his next planned robbery, but his fence Money (Nick Nolte) sends a psychotic young biker Ormon (Barry Keoghan) to do it instead with violent results. Mark Ruffalo plays Detective Lou Lubesnick who investigates the robberies and Halle Berry plays an insurance broker who’s becoming increasingly frustrated with her firm. It’s certainly got a star-studded cast.

For the vast majority of its runtime, Crime 101 is a hypnotic heist film with brilliantly developed characters and thrilling set pieces. While many will inevitably make comparisons with Michael Mann’s Heat, Crime 101 takes the usual crime thriller and Los Angeles tropes and does something interesting with them. This is a film that gives its characters space to breathe – Hemsworth is excellent as the stoic lead who wants emotional fulfilment but can’t make eye contact or bring himself to tell Monica Barbaro’s love interest what he does for a living. Mark Ruffalo’s perhaps more impressive as the dishevelled detective, who’s under pressure from his superior to find a neat solution to the robberies and park the case, and Barry Keoghan’s suitably slimy as the unstable motorbiker with bleached white hair. Layton also lays on some interesting critique on materialism in how every character is simply concerned with earning or gaining money or possessions to feel happiness.

The meaty substance is complimented by some terrific action sequences – the opening heist is outstanding, as is a car chase around half-way through. It’s confidently shot by Erik Wilson – the opening shot of an inverted LA skyline is particularly memorable and he doesn’t resort to quick, frenetic cuts on the action sequences, instead allowing them to breathe. Blanck Mass’ moody soundtrack is also excellent and ups the film’s intensity.

My only real qualm with Crime 101 is it doesn’t quite stick the ending – while the film builds up to a satisfying finale, its final scenes feel a little too neat, but I can mostly forgive the final five minutes or so when the rest of it’s just so gripping. Otherwise, Crime 101 is yet another brilliant showcase of Bart Layton’s talent and certainly the best heist film I’ve seen since American Animals or Widows. I can’t wait to see what he does next.

Send Help (Review)

Review
Still from 'Send Help'

Rating: 3 out of 5.

Director: Sam Raimi
Starring: Rachel McAdams, Dylan O’Brien, Edyll Ismail, Xavier Samuel, Chris Pang, Dennis Haysbert
Certificate: 15

Run Time: 115 mins

Send Help is a horror comedy directed by Sam Raimi, his first wholly original work since Drag Me To Hell all the way back in 2009. The always-reliable Rachel McAdams plays hard-working corporate strategist Linda Liddle, who’s been looking forward to a long-promised promotion at work. But when the CEO of the company dies, and his repugnant son, Bradley Preston (Dylan O’Brien) takes the mantle, Linda’s promotion is given to a recent hire who he happened to be fraternity brothers with. When she accompanies the team on a business trip to Bangkok, the plane crashes after suffering engine failure and Linda and Bradley find themselves wound up on a deserted island.

It might not be particularly thematically deep, but Send Help is a fun and gnarly romp that’s a Sam Raimi film through-and-through. Blood splatter? Check. Projectile vomit? Check. Rachel McAdams is brilliant as the meek office worker and shares an excellent chemistry with Dylan O’Brien’s loathsome CEO. As you’d expect, the tables turn because it just so happens Linda auditioned for a television show called ‘Survivor’, so knows a thing or two on how to sustain herself, while Bradley requires spoon-feeding. There’s a real thrill in witnessing the duo play off each other and you’re always questioning what their ulterior motives are.

Blending horror and comedy is perhaps the most difficult genre mix to pull off, but Raimi is reasonably successful here, although I wouldn’t call this a scary film in the slightest and while some of the jokes really land, others fall flat. One has to suspend belief a little in the third act where there’s perhaps one rug pull too many, but to Raimi’s credit, the finale is suitably vicious and nasty. It’s all accompanied by a somewhat subdued Danny Elfman score, and Bill Pope’s cinematography is uncharacteristically unshowy for a Sam Raimi film.

Send Help is an enjoyable romp with a standout Rachel McAdams performance that reminded me of Lord of the Flies, only under the veil of a corporate satire rather than a bunch of schoolboys. I wanted a bit more meat to the bone in terms of its themes and some of its beats are repetitive, but this is a fun, if not especially enriching, experience that only Sam Raimi could have concocted.

Primate (Review)

Review
Still from 'Primate'

Rating: 3 out of 5.

Director: Johannes Roberts
Starring: Johnny Sequoyah, Jessica Alexander, Victoria Wyant, Gia Hunter, Benjamin Cheng, Troy Kotsur
Certificate: 18

Run Time: 89 mins

Primate is a creature feature horror film about a chimpanzee who goes on a killer rampage after becoming infected with rabies. It’s directed by Johannes Roberts, whose credits include 47 Meters Down, The Strangers: Prey at Night and Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City – quite the chequered CV. The film opens with a vet entering an outdoor animal enclosure, where his face is grossly turn off by said chimpanzee, before the film winds back 36 hours earlier. Lucy (Johnny Sequoyah) is taking a flight back home after spending years away at college with her best friend Kate (Victoria Wyant), but Lucy doesn’t know that Kate has invited her friend Hannah (Jessica Alexander) to join the club too. Lucy’s deaf father, Adam (Troy Kotsur) is a celebrated author who lives on the edge of a cliff in a beautiful home with younger daughter Erin (Gia Hunter). They have an adopted chimpanzee, Ben, who Adam has taught to be highly intelligent and he communicates using custom soundboard software on a tablet. But when Ben gets bitten my a rabid mongoose, all hell breaks loose…

While it’s lacking in the script and character development department, Primate is a lean and mean natural horror film that relishes in its visceral violence and brutal body-part dismemberment. While I wouldn’t say it’s frightening, the film’s undeniably intense and there were several sequences where I winced – this is probably the nastiest horror I’ve seen since Terrifier 3 or In A Violent Nature. There’s a couple of very effective sequences, especially an impressively tense encounter in a bed. A significant portion of the film is set in an infinity pool – a place where Ben can’t attack, given the hydrophobia caused by rabies – novel, considering it’s the inverse of other natural horror films involving underwater creatures.

Hats off to Roberts and the crew on opting for practical physical effects over CGI. The killer chimpanzee is played by former mixed martial artist Miguel Torres Umba, and the way in which he moves brings a real menace that you’d never get with digital. The film’s also confidently shot by Stephen Murphy, with the camera often swirling around and peering on the characters like they’re being watched. Adrian Johnston’s score is also terrific, with memorable themes and its 1980s synth-heavy sound reminiscent of the works of John Carpenter.

It’s just a shame that the film drops the ball in the script department. Roberts co-writes the script with Ernest Riera and some of the dialogue is really ropey, not helped by some of the unconvincing performances from the cast. That said, the two performances that fare well are Johnny Sequoyah as the likeable lead and Troy Kotsur as the father – the deaf representation is a nice touch and lends the film some much-needed emotion, but it also results in an excellent set piece devoid of sound that’s from Kotsur’s perspective. After his Best Supporting Actor win for CODA, it’s refreshing to see Kotsur back on the big screen.

Primate is ultimately an effective animal rampage horror, a genre that no filmmaker’s really explored for a while. It’s grisly and gnarly, with the reliance on practical effects lending the film a real weight. I just wish the script and character development were on the same level – then we’d really be talking. Despite this, Primate is undeniably Johannes Roberts’s best film (although that’s damning with faint praise) and I hope it inspires him to be similarly creative in his future works.

No Other Choice (Review)

Review
Still from 'No Other Choice'

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Director: Park Chan-wook
Starring: Lee Byung-hun, Son Ye-jin, Park Hee-soon, Lee Sung-min, Yeom Hye-ran, Cha Seung-won
Certificate: 15

Run Time: 139 mins

No Other Choice is the new film by South Korean auteur Park Chan-wook, of Oldboy and The Handmaiden fame. It’s the second adaptation of a 1997 novel ‘The Ax’ by Donald E. Westlake, the first being a 1997 French film called The Axe. Park Chan-wook is no stranger to adapting English-language novels and transplanting them into his native South Korea, with The Handmaiden, for example, an adaptation of Sarah Waters’s ‘Fingersmith’.

Man-su (Lee Byung-hun) is an award-winning employee of papermaking company Solar Paper. He’s got a decent salary, he has purchased his childhood home and lives a luxurious lifestyle with his wife, two children and dogs. When an American company buys Solar Paper and fires many employees, Man-su finds himself out of work after 25 years of service. After thirteen months, he struggles to find a new gig, and the family have minimised their spending and now struggling to pay the mortgage, Man-su decides to identify those whose credentials exceed his own by posting a fake job advert and then bump them off to improve his employment prospects.

No Other Choice is yet another excellent film by the auteur filmmaker that’s directed with real confidence. Although its tone at first seems a little off for the usually serious director (it almost feels as if Park Chan-wook is trying to emulate Bong Joon Ho’s Parasite), the film quickly becomes darker with a scathing outlook on capitalism and Man-su’s murderous descent. There’s a sensational sequence with loud music and a three-way struggle involving oven gloves that goes straight up there with the director’s most memorable work.

The characters are uniformly well-developed, with the always-reliable Lee Byung-hun making for a compelling lead, a character who has to go through all the emotions that come with redundancy and finding one’s purpose again. It’s beautifully shot by Kim Woo-hyung with the director’s meticulous attention to detail and symmetry, and I found the film’s ending commentary on automation particularly grim and affecting. While No Other Choice isn’t quite up there with Park Chan Wook’s very best, it’s still a brilliant and ruthless critique on capitalism with excellent performances and memorable set pieces. I suspect it will be even better on future rewatches.

Every Film In The 28 Days Later Series Ranked (Including 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple)

Rankings
Still from '28 Years Later: The Bone Temple'

Little did we know in 2002 when Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s genre-furthering zombie horror 28 Days Later released that it would spawn an entire series. With four films in the franchise (and a fifth reportedly on the way), the franchise depicts the outbreak and effects of the contagious Rage Virus that induces homicidal rage in those that become infected, be it from a full-on bite or just a small drop of blood. The series focuses on the impact of the disease and how it decimates British society, and the original became quickly lauded as a cult classic and has had a significant influence in expanding the the zombie horror genre.

After the critically acclaimed 28 Days Later, neither director Danny Boyle or writer Alex Garland returned for the second instalment, 28 Weeks Later, handing the keys to Spanish director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. Although it received good reviews, many felt it wasn’t a patch on the original.

The series remained dormant until 2025, when both Boyle and Garland returned with 28 Years Later. This was intended as the start of a new trilogy written by Garland, and was filmed back-to-back with 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, although Boyle passed the baton to Candyman director Nia DaCosta. With The Bone Temple generating a rapturous response, a trilogy capper has been greenlit with Boyle back at the helm.

In this article, I’ll rank the four films to date – and it proved a rather difficult task because this is one of the most consistent horror series out there where even the film in last place is well above average.

4) 28 Weeks Later

Still from '28 Weeks Later'

The second film in the series is the only one to date that didn’t have Alex Garland on writing duties, but 28 Weeks Later is still an above average zombie horror with plenty going for it. Robert Carlyle makes for an excellent lead as Donald ‘Don’ Harris, who we witness leave his wife behind during a zombie attack in the brilliant opening scene. The rest of the film then relocates the action to London, where the American-led NATO forces try to establish a safe zone. Don tries to reunite with his children Tammy (a young Imogen Poots) and Andy (Mackintosh Muggleton) where he lies about abandoning their mother. But Tammy and Andy quickly discover they haven’t been told the truth when she’s found alive and well, and it’s discovered she’s an asymptomatic carrier of the Rage Virus. What follows is an insightful study into how societal breakdown reveals our worst selves and Juan Carlos Fresnadillo directs the film with plenty of energy in its thrilling second half. It may lack Danny Boyle’s frenetic direction, but 28 Weeks Later is a very fun ride.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

3) 28 Days Later

Still from '28 Days Later'

While I’m sure many will feel the original film placing third in this list is blasphemous, hear me out. 28 Days Later is an excellent zombie horror that progressed the genre with its fast-moving infected and clear inspiration from George A. Romero’s Night of the Living Dead. Garland’s script provides plenty of sharp commentary on the breakdown of society and there’s some excellent performances from Cillian Murphy, Naomie Harris and Brendan Gleeson. The first hour has a real bravura energy to it with some terrific set pieces, and is unmistakably Danny Boyle with Anthony Dod Mantle’s kinetic cinematography. John Murphy’s score is also endlessly memorable in its simplicity. But I’ve always thought the second half doesn’t live up to the first when the central quartet arrive at Christopher Eccleston’s army compound. At this point, the film becomes less about its characters and while it’s still very entertaining, it’s the first half that really shines.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

2) 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple

Still from '28 Years Later: The Bone Temple'

While 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple lacks Danny Boyle’s frenetic directorial style, it more than makes up for it with its fascinating narrative and memorable characters. It’s the very antithesis of 28 Years Later – a shaggy-dog affair with Anthony Dod Mantle’s disorienting but beautiful camerawork (often on an iPhone) that’s stuffed to the brim with thoughtful ideas and themes, while Nia DaCosta’s sequel is a focussed and polished film that feels smaller in scope. But that’s not a problem because this is a powerfully gripping sequel from start to finish (28 Years Later‘s second act relies on a slightly far-fetched decision that throws you out a little) with some sensational performances.

DaCosta sets the grim tone from the very first scene with Spike’s brutal and foul-mouthed initiation and never relents – this film is gleefully nasty and doesn’t hold back with its torture or body organ consumption. It’s certainly the strongest film in the 28 Days Later series to earn its 18 BBFC age rating. Jack O’Connell’s turn as the Satanic cult leader is absolutely fantastic – he makes for a truly repugnant villain, but with plenty of charisma to make him memorable. Both Ralph Fiennes and Chi Lewis-Parry are just as impressive in the film’s second storyline and when the two arcs eventually collide, it results in a giddily exciting third act climax of immense proportion. What’s more, there’s a brilliant score by Hildur Guðnadóttir and although Sean Bobbitt’s cinematography isn’t as memorable as Anthony Dod Mantle’s work, there are some stunning shots here.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

1) 28 Years Later

Still from 28 Years Later

But the edge goes to 28 Years Later, the third film in the series and the first of a proposed trilogy. This is a very exciting and ambitious sequel that was worth the long wait and it often really soars. This is a Danny Boyle film through-and-through, so expect the grainy feel of the original (this time, lots of the film is shot on iPhones), coupled with seriously kinetic cinematography from Anthony Dod Mantle – it’s one of the most striking-looking films of 2025. This is a film that’s full of ideas, and one that refuses to take obvious choices and like some of returning screenwriter Alex Garland’s recent filmography, there are plenty of influences from the UK’s recent political turmoils as the duo paint a picture of a national identity crisis.

When we get to the action, 28 Years Later is absolutely bursting with adrenaline and you’re constantly looking around the screen (when Mantle chooses to settle the camera for a second) for danger. The first act is where the film is strongest, especially a sequence where Spike and Jamie find themselves cornered in a house and a white-knuckle chase along a causeway. I love the way Mantle chooses to briefly pause a shot when an infected is killed and replay the kill from a different angle, and there are some stunning shots of the lush Northumbrian countryside, as well as the sadly-no-more Sycamore Gap tree near Hadrian’s Wall. The film makes a choice in the second act, which prompts Spike to return to the mainland and this stretch felt a little clunky to me, even if it’s still very entertaining. But the third act when Ralph Fiennes’ character enters the fray sees the film back on firmer footing and there’s plenty of the folkloric and elegiac elements clearly inspired by Garland’s Annihilation and Men. I can forgive the slightly wonky second act for the sheer ambition of the rest of the film because it is often transcendent.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments or tweet @TheFilmMeister

Rental Family (Review)

Review
Still from 'Rental Family'

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

Director: Hikari
Starring: Brendan Fraser, Takehiro Hira, Mari Yamamoto, Shannon Mahina Gorman, Akira Emoto
Certificate: 12A

Run Time: 110 mins

Rental Family is a comedy drama starring Brendan Fraser as Phillip Vanderploeg, a Japanese-based American actor who has been struggling to find meaningful work after a successful toothpaste advert seven years earlier. He meets Shinji (Takehiro Hira) who introduces him to his company, ‘Rental Family’, a business that provides actors to play stand-in family members and friends for strangers. “We sell emotion” is how Shinji sells it. Although somewhat reluctant at first, Phillip takes on two long-term jobs – one acting as the estranged father of a young half-Japanese girl called Mia (Shannon Mahina Gorman), who her mother thinks will be a great way to boost her daughter’s mood to get her into private school, and another as a journalist profiling retired actor Kikuo Hasegawa (Akira Emoto) with dementia. But Phillip finds himself getting a little too involved and finds himself caring for them.

This is a sweet-natured and very positive comedy-drama with an excellent Brendan Fraser performance that you’re sure to walk out of with a smile on your face. While the first half borders on saccharine, director Hikari does enough to keep things more than interesting in the latter half where the complexities and moral questionings of what the firm’s employees do come into the fray and it takes a more melancholic tone.

It’s hard not to be totally wrapped up by Fraser’s deliciously twinkly performance, with a gentle physicality and affable temperament – and Rental Family wouldn’t be half of what it is without that central performance. There’s good supporting performances from the rest of the cast, and there’s reasonably strong development of the firm’s employees who begin to form a warm dynamic. Takurô Ishizaka lenses the film neatly too, with some colourful, sweeping shots of the luscious Japanese landscape.

But although I enjoyed Rental Family for what it is, I wanted a deeper exploration into the themes of loneliness and loss, which the film only touches on. That would have given the narrative more of a complete circle. Still, if you want an uplifting comedy-drama with an effortlessly likeable Brendan Fraser, Rental Family hits the spot.

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (Review)

Review
Still from '28 Years Later: The Bone Temple'

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Director: Nia DaCosta
Starring: Ralph Fiennes, Jack O’Connell, Alfie Williams, Erin Kellyman, Chi Lewis-Parry
Certificate: 18

Run Time: 109 mins

Fittingly arriving 28 weeks later after last year’s excellent 28 Years Later is 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, which was filmed back-to-back with its predecessor. While Danny Boyle returned to the director’s chair for the first film in the proposed trilogy, The Bone Temple is directed by Nia DaCosta. I’ve had mixed opinions on her filmography to date – both Little Woods and Candyman were excellent, The Marvels was rather ropey (although DaCosta reportedly experienced a rough ride under the Marvel Cinematic Universe regime) and I don’t understand what all the fuss is about for her most recent film Hedda.

This sequel picks up immediately after 28 Years Later‘s jaw-dropping final scene, which generated rather a lot of controversy. The film opens as Spike (Alfie Williams) is initiated into the Fingers gang, led by the psychopathic “Sir Lord” Jimmy Crystal (Jack O’Connell), who claims to be the son of Satan. Crystal styles himself after Jimmy Savile, as do his gang members. The group go around disturbing the peace with any non-infected humans they can find, with torture and violence regularly on the menu (much to Spike’s disgust).

This storyline is intercut with another featuring Dr Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) who continues to maintain the titular Bone Temple, and his interesting relationship with Samson (Chi Lewis-Parry), the villainous Alpha zombie from the previous film. In the film’s third act, the two storylines are brought together to a rather memorable climax.

While 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple lacks Danny Boyle’s frenetic directorial style, it more than makes up for it with its fascinating narrative and memorable characters. It’s the very antithesis of 28 Years Later – a shaggy-dog affair with Anthony Dod Mantle’s disorienting but beautiful camerawork (often on an iPhone) that’s stuffed to the brim with thoughtful ideas and themes, while Nia DaCosta’s sequel is a focussed and polished film that feels smaller in scope. But that’s not a problem because this is a powerfully gripping sequel from start to finish (28 Years Later‘s second act relies on a slightly far-fetched decision that throws you out a little) with some sensational performances.

DaCosta sets the grim tone from the very first scene with Spike’s brutal and foul-mouthed initiation and never relents – this film is gleefully nasty and doesn’t hold back with its torture or body organ consumption. It’s certainly the strongest film in the 28 Days Later series to earn its 18 BBFC age rating. Jack O’Connell’s turn as the Satanic cult leader is absolutely fantastic – he makes for a truly repugnant villain, but with plenty of charisma to make him memorable. This is a much nastier performance than his much-lauded villainous turn in Sinners.

There’s some good performances from the rest of the Fingers gang (which reminded me of A Clockwork Orange), although some characters are inevitably short-changed with Jimmy Crystal’s penchant for needless violence. Erin Kellyman is brilliant as Jimmy Ink, one of the cult’s more empathetic members and Emma Laird is another highlight as one of the more sadistic figures.

The second storyline with Ralph Fiennes is also excellent, and his relationship with Samson is fascinating and even becomes touching as it progresses. Fiennes was one of the highlights of the last film, and here we get to dig even deeper into his methodological psyche as he tries to memorialise the victims of the epidemic and perhaps find a cure. Chi Lewis-Parry is just as impressive, and DaCosta’s humanisation of what was a no-good zombie lands this film a real emotional heft.

When the two storylines eventually collide, it results in a giddily exciting third act climax of immense proportion. There’s a particularly memorable sequence with Ralph Fiennes that I shan’t spoil and of course, there’s an exciting tease for what’s to come in the closing chapter.

But The Bone Temple isn’t a perfect film. The most significant flaw is the sidelining of Spike, who doesn’t get much of a character arc other than bearing witness to the cult’s horrific atrocities, and DaCosta could have explored the trauma of his character. On the flipside though, spending more time focussing on Spike might have disrupted the film’s breakneck pacing.

Hildur Guðnadóttir’s score is the very opposite of 28 Years Later‘s frenzied Young Fathers music, but it’s yet another brilliant work by the Oscar-winning composer. There are so many memorable themes here, especially in the opening and many of the scenes set in the Bone Temple, with brilliant needledrops too. And like the score, Sean Bobbitt’s cinematography isn’t as kinetic as Anthony Dod Mantle’s, but there are some stunning shots here, particularly of the Bone Temple and the star-filled night sky.

Other than Spike’s sidelining, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple is a masterclass of a middle chapter, that doesn’t sag under the weight of its own bones with its coherent and self-contained storyline. It’s wickedly nasty with some juicy performances, backed by a brilliant Hildur Guðnadóttir score and striking visuals. I think 28 Years Later is the slightly stronger film overall though – although ramshackle, it really soars in its strongest moments and there’s something to be said for Danny Boyle’s direction and Anthony Dod Mantle’s gonzo cinematography. I can’t wait to see how this trilogy concludes.

Hamnet (Review)

Review
Still from 'Hamnet'

Rating: 2 out of 5.

Director: Chloé Zhao
Starring: Jessie Buckley, Paul Mescal, Emily Watson, Joe Alwyn
Certificate: 12A

Run Time: 126 mins

Hamnet is the new film by Chloé Zhao, best known for her Best Picture and Best Director Oscar-winning film Nomadland. I’ve been rather mixed on her filmography – I thought Nomadland was fine but not Best Picture material, I really wasn’t a fan of The Rider and I liked Eternals, her divisive Marvel Cinematic Universe effort which I admired exactly because it upset the apple cart. Still, there’s no denying she has a distinctive style, with her Terrence Malick-like documentary aesthetics combined with themes of self-discovery and marginalised communities.

An adaptation of the 2020 novel of the same name by Maggie O’Farrell, Hamnet dramatises the life of William Shakespeare (Paul Mescal) and his wife Agnes (Jessie Buckley) from their courtship to how they cope with the tragic death of their 11-year-old son. The film has received quite the critical acclaim.

But I found Hamnet to be a very disappointing experience – an overlong, emotionally manipulative film that continuously and aggressively tries to get its audience to weep. Zhao’s film has the subtlety of a sledgehammer. Rather than getting invested in the depressing events it depicts and really feeling for the characters, I found myself rolling my eyes on multiple occasions and on the border of sniggering during what’s supposed to be a traumatic childbirth sequence because the film grossly overeggs it.

What’s more, I don’t understand the praise Jessie Buckley is receiving for her performance – I thought she was terrible. I’ve had mixed feelings on her past performances – she fares well in films such as I’m Thinking Of Ending Things, Men and Wicked Little Letters but she was woeful in Women Talking and The Lost Daughter. To this day, I can’t believe she received a Best Supporting Actress Oscar nomination for the latter with her wandering attempt at a British accent. In Hamnet, the problem is she’s simply miscast and her natural smirk does her no favours with the character’s emotional baggage. It’s unfortunate Buckley is also saddled with some rather trite dialogue.

Paul Mescal fares better, even if his Shakespeare is underdeveloped, but at least it’s a quiet performance where we’re invited to ponder how he might be feeling through his silences, emotionally distant expressions. This is a hurting character and the only way he can process the various tragedies he has experienced is by leaving his family behind and taking to developing his stage plays.

Max Richter can always be trusted to turn in a reliable score – and that’s true to an extent here. His moody music is sparsely used in the first half, but becomes more prevalent in the latter half and there’s a few excellent and memorable cues. But unfortunately, the film makes a choice to use what is perhaps his most notable work ‘On The Nature of Daylight’ in the closing scenes – and this is another factor that really hurts Hamnet. There’s no denying it’s a powerful piece, used to striking effect in works such as Shutter Island and The Last of Us – although it didn’t quite work for me in Arrival.

Richter reportedly was set to use original score for Hamnet’s ending, but apparently the inclusion of this prolific piece was suggested by Jessie Buckley. After already becoming withered and grey for the best part of an exasperating two hours in a film that’s tried and failed to get me to cry, ‘On The Nature of Daylight’s inclusion was the cherry on top of my frustrations and again, I snickered and rolled my eyes at the overcooked finale.

Elsewhere, Łukasz Żal’s (of Ida and The Zone of Interest fame) cinematography is occasionally beautiful, the highlight being how he captures the Globe Theatre, but I thought much of the film was unnecessarily dim, failing to convey the mood it’s trying to achieve.

Hamnet is ultimately a big disappointment. Its biggest problem is tone – Zhao tries to force-feed the emotion of the tragic events rather than being delicate. This is odd because the director’s style is one of delicacy and minimalism. In fact, Hamnet doesn’t really feel like a Chloé Zhao film because it’s lacking that meditative and thoughtful energy – none of her films have been emotionally manipulative or (I hate to say it) felt like Oscar bait. One of my issues with Nomadland was that it never quite managed to stick the emotional wallop it needed, but it’s the opposite problem here.

The core problems of Hamnet‘s script and tone not working then feed into the performances, and Jessie Buckley doesn’t have the chops to save it. Throw in the egregious use of ‘On The Nature of Daylight’ and scenes that evoke laughter rather than tears and it’s a recipe for disaster. At least Paul Mescal gets away with his reputation relatively unscathed. It’s saddening that Hamnet is dissatisfying on so many levels and I’m frightened at what Oscars it might get nominated for and win – it’s properly pants!

Best Films of 2025 (10-1)

Rankings, Year In Film

This is the second of two posts detailing my top 20 films of 2025. I previously ran you through my best films of 2025 (20-11) and now it’s time to unveil the top ten.

10) Hard Truths

After a couple of historical dramas (the excellent Mr Turner and the underwhelming Peterloo), director Mike Leigh returned to the kitchen sink improvised drama he’s most notable for. Leigh reunites with Secrets and Lies star Marianne Jean-Baptiste, who plays Pansy Deacon, a woman with a short temper who criticises anything and everything. She lives with her quiet plumber husband, Curtley (David Webber) and overweight and jobless but kind-hearted adult son Moses (Tuwaine Barrett). It quickly becomes apparent, though, that Pansy is a deeply troubled woman battling severe anxiety and depression and her sister Chantelle (Michele Austin) tries to ease her out of it.

Hard Truths is another excellent addition in Leigh’s filmography – often very funny but simultaneously devastating. An early scene in a supermarket is particularly rib-tickling as Pansy comes to blows with fellow customers. That devastation slowly invades the humour, though, as the film progresses, and the result is one of Leigh’s most crushing works. Marianne Jean-Baptiste is phenomenal as Pansy, but her performance is matched by both Webber and Barrett as her husband and son and the dynamic between the three of them is perfectly judged. I really felt for all of them and could understand their perspectives on the simmering situation. My only criticism is at 94 minutes, it’s a rather brief film and I wanted to spend more time with these fascinating characters.

9) The Seed of the Sacred Fig

Still from 'The Seed of the Sacred Fig'

The Seed of the Sacred Fig is an enthralling Iranian political drama about a family who are torn apart by politics. The film opens as the patriarch Iman (Missagh Zareh) gets a promotion when he is appointed as an investigating judge in the Revolutionary Court in Tehran. This is amidst nationwide political protests against the authoritarian government, and Iman quickly learns that he’s not been hired to carefully gather the facts before casting judgement – instead, he’s expected to simply approve judgements without assessing the evidence, which includes death sentences. His wife, Najmeh (Soheila Golestani) lives at home with two daughters Rezvan (Mahsa Rostami) and Sana (Setareh Maleki), and all of their relationships become strained once a friend of Rezvan’s is shot in the face during a demonstration and Najmeh and her daughters provide first aid in their apartment without telling Iman.

Directed by Mohammad Rasoulof, an individual who has been arrested several times by the Iranian government for the nature of his films, The Seed of the Sacred Fig is utterly transfixing and the 167 minutes fly by. The characters are brilliantly developed and there’s a real tension in how the family situation continues to escalate before reaching its wild third act. Although this got an Oscar nomination for Best Foreign Language Film at the ceremony celebrating 2024, it’s a much stronger film in my view than It Was Just An Accident (which is still very good), which has received rapturous acclaim ahead of the upcoming Awards season – don’t overlook this film.

8) Marty Supreme

Still from 'Marty Supreme'

Marty Supreme is Josh Safdie’s first film as a solo director since 2008, after his many collaborations with his brother Benny. This sports drama is loosely inspired by the life and career of American table tennis player Marty Reisman, and stars Timothée Chalamet as Marty Mauser, an aspiring and ambitious table tennis champion. It’s a film Safdie has been wanting to make for a while, with Chalamet cast all the way back in 2018, the actor practicing the sport ever since.

This is a brilliant sports drama with a terrific Timothée Chalamet central performance and a tension-filled atmosphere. It reminded me heavily of Uncut Gems, the last film the Safdies directed together, in how it sustains a palpable tension throughout with Marty continually digging himself into more desperate situations. That Josh Safdie has been able to make such a gripping film out of what may seem like a low-stakes sport is a commendable achievement. The film is stunningly shot by Darius Khondji, with a seedy aesthetic that faithfully recreates a 1950s feel and there’s a pulsating score by Daniel Lopatin that dominates over the entire film. This is a wild thrill ride from start to finish that never lets you take a breather and it’s impressive how Safdie gets you to root for a host of unlikeable characters.

7) Caught Stealing

Still from Caught Stealing

It might seem strange that Darren Aronofsky chose to direct what appears to be a straight-up crime thriller, an adaptation of the 2004 Charlie Huston novel – after all, he’s known for his psychological dramas that explore broken and conflicted individuals. However, don’t worry because there’s plenty of Aronofsky to be found in this darkly original film. Caught Stealing is a wildly unpredictable ride from start to finish that holds no punches in its brutal approach. Aronofsky is on top form here, and the film is directed with real flair, with plenty of his trademark grimness. This is a film that’s often wince-inducing and blackly comic, often at the same time. It has a real kineticism, and there’s some excellent set pieces, especially a third act car chase. But there’s also heart and I really brought the electic mix of characters trying to survive in a grimily realised New York City.

Austin Butler is terrific as Hank, a deeply troubled individual who’s struggling to get himself out of a vicious cycle. Aronofsky gives the character plenty of meat to the bone. Matt Smith is having fun as the drug dealer neighbour with an outrageous mohawk, and Regina King’s excellent as a deliciously slippery police detective. Liev Schreiber and Vincent D’Onofrio are also brilliant as Lipa and Smully Drucker, Hasidic brothers who you really don’t want to mess with. The film’s vividly shot by Aronofsky’s regular cinematographer Matthew Libatique and there’s a fun post-punk score by British band Idles that’s been written by Rob Simonsen, who scored The Whale. I was surprised just how much I liked Caught Stealing, expecting it to be a minor work by Aronofsky after his last couple of films have explored some heavy subject matter, but this is up there with some of his best work.

6) Warfare

Still from Warfare (2025) film

A war film directed by Ray Mendoza and Alex Garland, Warfare is based on Mendoza’s experiences during the Iraq War as a US Navy SEAL. The script and story is taken from the testimonies of the platoon members and presented in real time on one horrible day in November 2006 as the squad takes control of an Iraqi house under the cover of darkness. What follows is a bloody, pointless siege as the platoon comes under enemy attack. Mendoza previously acted as the military supervisor for Alex Garland’s excellent previous film, Civil War. For Warfare, Mendoza and Garland wrote the script together and although both filmmakers receive a director credit, Garland says he had more of a supporting role to Mendoza. All in, this film certainly has an original and intriguing concept.

Warfare is a powerful and gripping war film – a haunting meditation of the human experience without a forced story arc or political stance. Mendoza and Garland ratchet up the tension throughout, crafting an unnerving atmosphere that the platoon are going to be annihilated by the enemy, even though long stretches of the film are of the monotony of waiting around. There’s almost a documentary feel to cinematographer David J. Thompson’s cameras, which makes the experience all the more lifelike. The sound design, in particular stands out – this is a must-see in the cinema for the sound alone. I particularly admired how the film experiments with sound from the character’s perspective, for example a high-frequency, unearthly pitch after a bomb explodes. Save for an ending sequence, the film’s also devoid of music which really works – there are no artificial devices here to emotionally manipulate. Warfare is an incredibly immersive and visceral piece with a lean and mean quality to its pacing. I’m sure some who will criticise the film for not taking a political stance, like Garland was criticised for not doing with Civil War but that’s missing the point –Warfare is instead about the pointless destruction of war.

5) I’m Still Here

I’m Still Here is a political biographical drama about a husband’s forced disappearance during the military dictatorship in Brazil and Walter Salles’ first film since 2012’s On The Road. It’s based on Marcelo Rubens Paiva’s 2015 memoir of the same name, Marcelo being the son of Rubens Paiva, who was the victim in question. Fernanda Torres places Eunice Paiva, Rubens’ wife and activist, with the film largely told from her perspective and how she struggles to cope emotionally and financially, while trying to raise her five children. 

I found I’m Still Here to be a deeply affecting and gripping piece of work, masterfully directed by Walter Salles who skilfully contrasts the quiet family domesticity with the simmering and oppressive political horror. Although the film tells a story that happens in the past, I’m Still Here feels very contemporary with its mirroring of current dystopian events. The first hour is quite fast-paced, whereas the second is much slower but this is where the film really wraps its enchanting spell – it reminded me of Roma in many ways in terms of how it finds beauty in the mundane. The film’s complimented by a wonderful Warren Ellis score, which is very subdued in the first half but becomes more melodic later on. Although the majority of the film is set in 1970, the last half an hour jumps forward to 1996 and 2014. Although these somewhat disturb the film’s rhythm, they’re crucial in how they magnify the cruel Brazilian regime of 1970 and how the father’s disappearance continues to have a lasting effect on Eunice and the rest of her family’s lives, lending the film an epic quality. Fernanda Torres is just sensational as Eunice and fully deserving of the Best Actress Oscar nomination she received. She deftly balances her intelligence and frantic search for the truth while being as motherly as she can to her children. This is Walter Salles at the top of his game supported by terrific performances and an important, timely story.

4) The Brutalist

The Brutalist is an epic period drama directed by Brady Corbet, who last made the excellent Vox Lux. Undeniably more ambitious in scope, Corbet’s latest spans over thirty years and a three and a half hour run time. Adrien Brody plays László Tóth, a Hungarian-Jewish Holocaust survivor and Bauhaus-trained architect who immigrates to America and tries to integrate into their culture. Corbet directs the film with real bravura – although it’s about Tóth’s architectural career on the surface, there are plenty of parallels with the idea of how someone suffers for their art and how they are the person remembered rather than the entity throwing money at a project. Of course, that means there’s themes of compromise and interference and although its last 30 minutes may seem to take a different, seemingly incomprehensible tone, I found it very thought-provoking.

Adrien Brody turns in a career-best performance as the suffering artist, nailing the Slavic accent and mannerisms. Guy Pearce is also a standout as a slimy financier in a very multi-faceted performance. Pearce is no stranger to playing villains – his deliciously evil turn in Lawless is evidence of that – but this is a complex individual with all the qualities of someone who has too much money. I was less taken with Felicity Jones’ turn as Erszébet, who doesn’t feel as authentic as Brody or Pearce. But I don’t think all of the blame should be placed on Jones because her relationship with László is underdeveloped and in my opinion, that’s the film’s main flaw. Daniel Blumberg’s prickly score is wonderful, lending the film a simmering intensity and he crafts many memorable themes that develop throughout the film. The Brutalist is also beautifully shot by Lol Crawley, resurrecting the VistaVision process to authentically portray the period. It’s staggering how good the film looks, considering its modest $9.6 million budget and bearing in mind its epic run time. While not perfect, I loved The Brutalist, teeming with brilliant performances, a sharp script and endlessly striking visuals. Granted, some elements are underdeveloped but this is a film that earns its lengthy runtime and I was engrossed from start to finish. I can’t wait to see what Brady Corbet does next.

3) Zootopia 2

Still from Zootopia 2

It’s very rare that a long-awaited sequel can better an outstanding original film. But Zootopia 2 did just that – a real treat of a film that takes everything there is to love about the original and develops it in a very satisfying way. The gags come quick and fast and there are so many small, clever details to find in repeat viewings, but this is balanced with plenty of heart and emotion too. Directors Byron Howard and Jared Bush perfectly balance familiar elements that were the highlights of the original film, with new characters, gags and locations. There’s some fantastic set pieces, ranging from a kinetic opening car chase to a powerfully emotional sequence in a power plant. The film’s also intelligently relevant to current events, such as its depiction of a puppet-like mayor (a stallion hilariously voiced by Patrick Warburton) and the unjust persecution of minority races.

The chemistry between Nick and Judy is brilliant once again, from lots of laughs to be had in them being forced into a therapy session to their relationship being tested time and time again through events with real stakes. There’s some excellent additions to the cast, with Ke Huy Quan a highlight as Gary De’Snake, Patrick Warburton as the aforementioned Mayor and Danny Trejo as a basilisk. It’s all held together by an excellent score by Michael Giacchino, who introduces some memorable new themes. I can’t wait to see where the world and characters are taken next, and not only is it one of the best films of the year, Zootopia 2 is one of the best animated films of the decade, along with Soul and Wallace and Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl.

2) One Battle After Another

Still from 'One Battle After Another'

One Battle After Another is a Paul Thomas Anderson triumph – it’s a giddily exciting action epic with plenty of thrilling surprises up its sleeve. It’s fiersomely original, Anderson constantly subverts expectations in a refreshing way with some outrageous set-pieces too. There’s two heart-racing car chases, with the one in the final act particularly memorable for how simple it is – cinematographer Michael Bauman (who also lensed Licorice Pizza) intercuts between three drivers and a stunning desert vista. A 20-minute extended sequence mid-way through the film where DiCaprio’s character needs to evade the authorities is another wildly entertaining highlight. But under the surface of this riveting story, Anderson has plenty to ruminate on the current state of American affairs but in a playful way with plenty of intelligent humour.

Leonardo DiCaprio is fantastic in the lead, dabbling his hand at comedy once again after his last turn in the underrated Don’t Look Up. Once a sharp and intelligent explosives expert, Anderson gets a lot of mileage out of the character who fries his brain with drugs after 16 years and DiCaprio nails it. Is this one of his best roles? It’s hard to say because the actor is so good in almost everything he’s in. Sean Penn puts in career-best work as the bigoted Colonel Lockjaw, an utterly ridiculous and tragicomic racist military officer with a particularly memorable walk. Benicio Del Toro is another standout too as a chilled-as-a-cucumber karate teacher – “I’ve had a few small beers” has already entered the lexicon. The film is beautifully shot on VistaVision by Michael Bauman and Jonny Greenwood turns in a thoroughly unconventional but sensational score. One Battle After Another is a near-masterpiece from Paul Thomas Anderson and it’s certainly his best film since There Will Be Blood.

So the best film of the year is…

1) Weapons

Still from 'Weapons'

The best film of the year is Zach Cregger’s follow-up to his excellent debut film, Barbarian. Like that film, Weapons is a high-concept horror-thriller that packs plenty of satisfying surprises up its sleeve. The film opens with a child narrator explaining that one Wednesday, in the town of Maybrook, Pennsylvania, seventeen children from schoolteacher Justine Gandy’s (Julia Garner) third-grade class ran away from their homes at 2:17am and disappeared. Only one student, Alex Lilly (Cary Christopher) did not disappear and Gandy is immediately ostracised by the community who suspect her of being involved. To say anymore would be to veer into spoiler territory, but what follows is presented in a non-linear narrative told by certain character’s perspectives. Cregger has said the film is inspired by Paul Thomas Anderson’s Magnolia in structure, whereby there’s overlap between certain stories.

Weapons is a brilliant film and cements Zach Cregger as one of the most exciting up-and-coming talents. This is an assured, skilfully crafted film with some sensational set-pieces and clearly influenced by Magnolia and Prisoners in tone. amazing. Like BarbarianWeapons hides some outrageous twists up its sleeve and is thematically rich, with lots of the symbolism and plot points up to interpretation. The way in which the film is split into chapters told by different character’s perspectives is an excellent way to tell the story, and it’s interesting to see how certain characters are likeable when portrayed from one perspective, but abhorrent from another. I was totally gripped from the moment Weapons opened to its finish with its enthralling story and pulse-raising setpieces. This is fiersomely original filmmaking and it’s expertly paced. Some might not like that the film has a reasonably neat explanation but I really brought the third act and found it particularly chilling and exciting. Weapons has proven even better on subsequent rewatches, where you start to notice the smaller details in how the different stories overlap and the film remains just as breakneck in its pacing.


What are your favourite films of 2024? Let me know in the comments or tweet @TheFilmMeister