Every Predator film ranked from worst to best (including Predator: Badlands)

Rankings

The Predator has been haunting screens since 1987 with the Arnold Schwarzenegger-starring original, becoming one of the most recognisable sci-fi monsters in cinema, spawning an ever-expanding series of films.

With Predator: Badlands now released, this article ranks all of the films in the series so far.

Besides my last choice, there is not much between the seven films quality-wise – they’re all very solid and all pose some interesting ideas. However, the top three entries are a significant step-up from the films in fourth and fifth position and my ranking of them could interchange on any given day.

7) Predator: Killer of Killers

Still from Predator: Killer of Killers

An adult animated anthology film filmed in secret ahead of Predator: Badlands, this is unfortunately the weakest in the series. This animated film is split into four sections – three which tell the stories of human warriors throughout various points of history who face off against a Predator and a final section which ties the preceding stories together. Predator: Killer of Killers is an odd film – the three standalone stories are rather undercooked but the final section that then ties them together is rather excellent, with some fascinating concepts. The film is balls-to-the-wall action and holds nothing back when it comes to gore, which I’m sure many will appreciate. But I like some meat to the bone, and the standalone stories feel as if they’re feature film concepts that have been distilled into their final climax Predator face-off sequence. Not helping proceedings is the poor script and lack of character development, and I didn’t care much for the disorienting animation style either. Although the lack of substance of the three stories failed to properly engage me, it’s the final section which really elevates proceedings. How Trachtenberg ties these stories together is like a child playing in a sci-fi sandpit, with a thrilling set piece and some tantalising teases that hint towards the future.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

6) Predator

predator-movie-review-image-header

This is probably where you completely shut off and disregard this list, but hear me out. The original Predator is still a great film, but it’s more a film of scenarios than a cohesive narrative and it’s a bit of a trudge to get through until we get to the now-classic Arnie vs The Predator fight which in itself is awesome. Director John McTiernan (who would later go on to make the perfect Die Hard) succeeds in creating suspense with numerous shots of the Predator watching on its prey but there isn’t all that much character development and because of the lack of a narrative thread, there are a few stretches where not much happens. The film also features a very memorable score that has carried through to the rest of the series from Alan Silvestri. Predator is still an enjoyable film but controversially, I don’t think it has aged all that well and the other films have taken the material in more interesting directions.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

5) The Predator

predator_DF_12736_R_rgb.0

The Predator is shambolically put together and its pacing is rather breakneck, but it is a really entertaining film and director Shane Black’s signature humour is put to good use here, through the characterisations of the PTSD-ridden soldiers who take on the mythical creature. The first half in particular has some really interesting ideas and some well-constructed action sequences, particularly one in a science facility. I also really liked the decision to have this film set more in the suburbs and the contrast of the Predator to the urban area is interesting.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

4) Predator: Badlands

Still from 'Predator: Badlands'

Considering we’re now seven films in, this is the first time a film has a Predator as the protagonist, with Predator: Badlands completely devoid of humans. Directed by Dan Trachtenberg, the film follows Dek (Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi), a runt Predator who takes a vow to hunt a mythical creature called the Kalisk on the lethal planet Genna to earn his father’s approval. The first half is particularly strong, with Dek oddly likeable as the uncommonly sensitive Predator and the relationship between him and Weyland-Yutani synthetic Thia (Elle Fanning) is well-developed. It says a lot about the quality of Trachtenberg’s direction and Patrick Aison’s tight script that we root for Dek when he speaks in his native Yautja language throughout the film, translated via subtitles. There’s lots of good world-building too, both of Dek’s home planet and the hostile environment of Gonna. The film’s well-paced and rolls along at a brisk pace and it’s vividly shot by Jeff Cutter, even if there’s an over-reliance on visual effects at times. It may lack the simplicity of Prey and veer into a bit of a CGI-fest in its final act before an excellent closing set piece, but Predator: Badlands is a very solid entry in the enduring series.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

Prey is an excellent prequel and was just the gut-punch the series needed. Dan Trachtenberg directs with flair and the film features some terrific performance among its almost exclusively Native American cast. The very fact Trachtenberg has opted to centre the film around an underrepresented community is to be commended, too, with the only exception to the rule being a group of French fur trappers Naru encounters. Amber Midthunder makes for a formidable screen presence and it’s great the film focusses on her humanity. She is portrayed as both a skilled hunter but also an individual who makes mistakes. Trachtenberg’s mirroring of smaller animals hunting each other and the Predator and anything that steps in its way is also an excellent creative stroke.

★★★★

2) Predator 2

predator-DI-2-1864x1118.jpg

Generally regarded as the worst in the series, Predator 2 is a very brave film in my opinion and is certainly not a film that would be made in this day and age. It’s a film that successfully expands upon the mythologies established in the first film and the Afro aesthetic puts an interesting spin on the character. Danny Glover is great in the lead role, a hot-headed policeman who wants justice but is afraid of heights, which he faces multiple times in the film. The film also features performances from Gary Busey as a shady DEA agent and Bill Paxton as a wisecracking new recruit. There isn’t a boring moment in the film and the final fight sequence is particularly satisfying, over multiple set pieces and sets up future films and cross-overs.

★★★★

1) Predators

predators-2010

Robert Rodriguez was a very interesting choice to reboot the series after Predator 2 failed to impress. Taking a producer role and having Hungarian director Nimrod Antal in the directors chair, Predators is the best in the series in terms of its ideas and narrative. The idea of setting this film on another planet also helps to further expand the mythology and the whole mystery of why specific people are chosen to participate in this game is compelling. The cast are uniformly great, with Adrien Brody solid in the lead and standout performances from Topher Grace, Louis Ozawa Changchien and Laurence Fishburne. Although its second half morphs more into a blockbuster, its first half is where the film really excels and poses its ideas. Although The Predator was a fine entry in the series following this film, what I’d really like to see are sequels / spin-off’s to Predators as there are a lot of interesting places you can take this concept. It’s a shame Predators didn’t do all that well at the box office and remains a very underrated entry in the series.

★★★★


What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments or tweet @TheFilmMeister

Every Film In The Conjuring Universe Ranked (Including The Conjuring: Last Rites)

Rankings
Still from 'The Conjuring'

When director James Wan‘s deeply effective The Conjuring released in 2013, little did anyone think a standalone horror film depicting one of Ed and Lorraine Warren’s cases would spawn into a fully-fledged cinematic universe. Despite a handful of misfires, the series has proven mostly solid spinning an entertaining yarn on the paranormal investigators and the rogue’s gallery of supernatural demons and entities they’ve faced. 

With The Conjuring: Last Rites now in cinemas, and supposedly the final outing for Ed and Lorraine Warren, here is my ranking of all the films in The Conjuring Universe to date. Note I’m including The Curse of La Llorona, which was considered part of the series when it released but then wasn’t in 2021 when director Michael Chaves said it was only intended as “a wink and a nod” to the franchise.

10) Annabelle

ANNABELLE

Annabelle is unquestionably the worst of the series and has virtually no redeeming qualities to it. Riding off the success of The Conjuring a year before, John R. Leonetti’s spin-off is a blatantly unoriginal, preposterous cash grab that save for one very well orchestrated scare and beautiful cinematography, is a dud. Annabelle lacks any of the sense of dread The Conjuring has and the jump scares are obvious and uninspiring. The cast are uniformly terrible, in particular Ward Horton and the script is cringeworthy. Its ending is particularly offensive where characters make irrational and stupid decisions and I laughed multiple times. It’s a film that looks like it should have gone straight-to-DVD and represented a complete U-turn in quality for the series.

Rating: 1.5 out of 5.

9) The Nun

NUN_01591r.0

The Nun is an absolute trainwreck – the film is edited extremely badly, its overreliance on jump scares mean it isn’t scary and the story is borderline incoherent. However, unlike Annabelle, there are some redeeming qualities to The Nun

Director Corin Hardy is clearly a horror aficionado which shows in the film’s cineliteracy (there are allusions to some of the Hammer horror films for instance) and the film is quite atmospheric and establishes a chilling setting. For instance, there are some breathtaking shots of the exteriors of the monastery which really portray the grandeur and influence it has on its characters. This is by far, the most frightening aspect of the film and leaves a lot to audience interpretation. It’s strange then that Hardy resorts to jump scares, which are all poor and there is not a single memorable one in the film. It’s also strange that Hardy chooses to punish the characters in the worst possible way towards the beginning of the film. There is an extended sequence where a character is stuck in a grave, which is a horrifying scenario but anything that happens to this character afterwards is never as bad. Surely, this sequence would have worked better towards the end of the film? Despite these fatal mis-steps, all of Hardy’s good work in the film’s atmosphere is undone and squandered by how the film has been edited. Every scene films too brief and this really hinders in creating a creepy atmosphere. Somewhere here is a good enough film, but the way it has been edited completely undermines this and this results in The Nun ultimately being very disappointing.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

8) The Nun 2 

the-nun-2.jpg-1

The Nun 2 represents an improvement over the original with better storytelling and coherent editing but still suffers from its fair share of problems. Director Michael Chaves makes a stronger effort to give the characters an arc, it’s slickly shot and edited and the second half is entertaining in places. However, the jump scares aren’t particularly effective and the first hour is quite tedious, as Sisters Irene and Debra (Taissa Farmiga and Storm Reid) try to catch up with the fact Valak (Bonnie Aaron) has possessed Maurice (Jonas Bloquet) which we learnt at the end of the previous film. The script is quite clunky and there’s some inexcusable exposition, a seemingly all-knowing librarian the nuns meet in their investigation who conveniently happens to know all the particulars of a Macguffin device they need and exactly how to defeat the demon is incredibly lazy. A revelatory line in the film’s climax relating to a mother’s eyes is also unintentionally laughable. It’s also a shame Storm Reid’s character is underdeveloped following a potentially interesting introduction and Anna Popplewell’s unconvincing Irish accent is distracting. 

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

7) The Conjuring: Last Rites

Still from The Conjuring: Last Rites

While The Conjuring: Last Rites isn’t a bad film, it’s a disappointing ending to the mainline series. Director Michael Chaves veers between an overly schmaltzy tone in how the relationship between a now grown-up Judy (Mia Tomlinson) and Tony (Ben Hardy) develops, and also the relationship between Ed and Lorraine Warren, with sub-par horror. The decision to revert back to the haunted house formula is a bad one, with Chaves lacking James Wan’s mastery in the scares department. While there’s semblances of tension here and there, he doesn’t create a palpable atmosphere of dread like Wan does. There’s a couple of good scares – one involving pausing a videotape and another in a room of mirrors, but the rest are rather underwhelming. Nothing here is on the scale of the tremendous scene from the first film of two children frozen in fear of something that may or may not be behind a door. Chaves unfortuantely also succumbs to many bouts of fan service and in an age of legacy sequels, he leaves the door open by setting Judy and Tony as successors to their parents – Ben Hardy’s Tony essentially performs the same function as Shia La Boeuf’s Mutt in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. While The Conjuring: Last Rites is supposedly the end for Ed and Lorraine Warren for now, nothing’s really the end but I hope whatever’s next in store for the series has some more thought and care put into it.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

6) Annabelle Comes Home 

MV5BMjZjOWJlNjEtODVmYS00ZWI2LWI0MTktZjM3YjNmYzQ5OTgyXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjg2NjQwMDQ@._V1_

The third film in the Annabelle trilogy isn’t as effective as the second but writer Gary Dauberman’s directorial debut has a lot going for it. Dauberman’s film is the first spin-off to feature the Warren’s and is effectively a horror-spin on Night At The Museum as Judy Warren (Mckenna Grace) and her babysitter Mary Ellen (Madison Iseman) inadvertently release Annabelle’s spirit in the artifacts room. The storyline is solid, but the film’s not particularly scary and rather empty in feeling. 

Rating: 3 out of 5.

5) The Curse of La Llorona

la-llorona-1-thumb-700x421-210379-0cea66c

Only loosely tied to The Conjuring Universe, Michael Chaves’ directorial debut is based on the Latin American folklore of La Llorona, a vengeful ghost who roams near bodies of water mourning her children who she drowned in a jealous rage after discovering her husband was cheating on her. Although Chaves doesn’t make the most of the absorbing background story, the film is still an entertaining watch with a handful of effective scares. He does a good job of establishing Anna (Linda Cardellini) and her children and the film is crisply shot by Michael Burgess. 

Rating: 3 out of 5.

4) The Conjuring 2

3a1d3a4e4e1f450babc48b482c4d151a_compressed

The Conjuring 2 isn’t as strong as the first film – it is overlong which severely impacts the pacing and just isn’t quite as interesting a story as the first one was. However, horror-maestro James Wan delivers in spades on the scare-front and the film has some truly frightening sequences and there are also some great performances from the cast. Only Wan could have made or been given permission to make this film as 134 minutes for a horror film is uncommonly long and whilst there is a lot of character development (and self-indulgence), 20 minutes could fairly easily have been chopped off and the film would almost be as strong as the original. This is definitely its main problem which is to its detriment. The film bears many similarities to William Friedkin’s The Exorcist and there are a couple of moments where the film leaves a bit of a sour taste as it reiterates many of the clichéd elements of superior horror films. Coming off a near-perfect original, it’s a shame The Conjuring 2 isn’t a knock-out, but that was always going to be impossible and there is still a lot to like in this film.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

3) The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It 

2499.jpg

The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It represents a welcome change of direction compared to the first two films in that it delves from the haunted house formula and is more of a police procedural crime thriller. The story the film is based on is riveting, even if some creative liberties have been taken with it for it to fit the horror genre. The performances are all excellent, Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson as the Warren’s again are the centrepiece of the franchise and the film expands and revolves around their strong relationship. James Wan is not behind the camera this time around, with The Curse of La Llorona’s Michael Chaves inheriting the mantle. Chaves’ direction attempts to ape Wan’s from the use of title cards and a prologue sequence at the beginning to the general tone of the film. However, when it comes to the horror aspect of the film, Chaves just does not craft the scares in as sophisticated a fashion as Wan. I was riveted from start to finish but there is always the question of what if this film had been directed by James Wan and I think if had, the result here would have been extraordinary. If the film doubled down on its scares or chose to eliminate them completely and spent longer developing its characters and establishing the stakes, this could have been a masterpiece.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

2) Annabelle: Creation

1497965576937

Annabelle: Creation is a marked improvement over its predecessor and is suitably scary, features good character development and is shot beautifully by cinematographer Maxime Alexandre. It also ties itself nicely into the wider universe but not enough to detract from the film – director David F. Sandberg still manages to satisfy on a standalone level. One must applaud Sandberg for having a go at crafting many different types of scares and seeing what sticks and there are several sequences which are superbly crafted. Unfortunately, the film does stick to convention at times and there are a few sections bordering on comedy but it is so, so much better than its predecessor in every level. When the film works, it’s superb and it’s nice and tightly paced. It’s astounding how much of a shift in quality this is from the first film which had no hope.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

1) The Conjuring 

the-conjuring1

The Conjuring is by far and away the best film in the series and also represents a career best for director James Wan, which this film really helped to propel his career. The film is suitably scary, very atmospheric and has a fascinating narrative. Wan develops the characters superbly, in particular Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson, who are great as The Warren’s. Although the scares aren’t the most original, it’s in the execution which allows this film to really deliver and some of the set pieces in this film are mesmerising. The Conjuring is a film that is even better on rewatches and when we come back to look on the horror genre in the 2010’s, this film will definitely be remembered.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments or tweet @TheFilmMeister

Every Darren Aronofsky film ranked from worst to best (including Caught Stealing)

Rankings
NOAH

Darren Aronofsky is one of my favourite film directors and always makes extremely thoughtful and original films that are brimming with his signature style.

With his latest film, Caught Stealing, currently playing in cinemas, here I rank his filmography from worst to best. It’s telling that I even have plenty of respect for his weakest film.

9) Pi

Pi - 1998

A challenging watch, Pi takes a few watches to get your head around and its ambition is certainly to be admired. This low-budget surrealist debut from Aronofsky centers around an unemployed mathematician Max Cohen (Sean Gullette), who lives in squalor in a Chinatown apartment in New York and believes everything in life can be understood by numbers. But this Lynchian film isn’t just about maths – there’s plenty of commentary on religion too, and you have to admire the film for its frenetic tone, committed performances and manic Clint Mansell score.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

8) The Whale

The Whale is an adaptation of Samuel D. Hunter’s 2012 play and follows a morbidly obese English teacher, Charlie (Brendan Fraser), who has eaten himself to this state following the suicide of his partner. Although the film received mixed reviews, I found it to be an emotionally powerful experience with a terrific performance from Brendan Fraser. Aronofsky beautifully explores the relationship between a father and his daughter and there are many touching moments focussing on Charlie’s outlook of life. I walked out of the film grateful and determined to further my relations with others and to always be positive. Yet, the film deftly conveys Charlie’s pain and hopelessness and it becomes inevitable early on that he is on a path of self-destruction. The way in which Aronofsky portrays binge-eating is particularly harrowing – like Requiem For A Dream will make you never want to touch drugs, The Whale is the equivalent for food. It wouldn’t be an Aronofsky film without the exploration of religion and the events on-screen are interwoven with religious parallels and texts, which lend a pathos to Charlie’s situation. 

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

7) mother!

screen-shot-2017-08-01-at-11-43-10-am

I still haven’t really made up my mind on ‘mother!’ and I doubt I will until I have watched it a few more times. The first two acts are particularly grim and brooding and develop really neatly into what is a bonkers third act. I think I enjoy the film more for its conceptual nature rather than the actual film itself which I found a little hard to get into at times. That said, the film has made a very long lasting impression on me and I keep thinking about it. Aronofsky crafts some really strong and memorable images and I really enjoyed the characterisation. ‘mother!’ reinforces my love of film and is why I continue to be enamoured with the medium of film. It’s films like ‘mother!’ that challenge their audiences and aren’t just acceptable and dumb that really keep me driven.  I’m not really sure (and it is surely deliberate by Aronofsky) what the film means but on first viewing, I found the film to be delirious, deeply allegorical, manic, paranoid and genuinely unnerving. ‘mother!’ is definitely a film that deserves and I appreciate exists. This film has the potential to crawl up the list as time passes but for now, I have to put it 6th.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

6) The Fountain

the-fountain-movie-image

The Fountain is a rather misunderstood film and received mixed reviews on its release. It is frequently enthralling and is a pure spectacle to behold on screen – it’s very impressive to see what one can do with a limited budget. This is in my opinion, Aronofsky’s first explicit exploration of religion and is perhaps one of the director’s most personal films. It features great performances across the board and features a magnificent score by Aronofsky-regular Clint Mansell and stunning cinematography by Matthew Libatique. So why it doesn’t it rank any higher? Its pacing feels rather disjointed and the film is a bit of a slog in parts and is paced too quickly in others. A more ruthless editor who knew how to assemble the film in a better way, I’m sure would have put this up there with his best films.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

5) Caught Stealing

Still from Caught Stealing

While it might seem strange that Aronofsky is directing what appears to be a straight-up crime thriller – don’t worry because there’s plenty of Aronofsky to be found in this darkly original adaptation of Charlie Huston’s 2004 novel. Caught Stealing is a wildly unpredictable ride from start to finish that holds no punches in its brutal approach. Aronofsky is on top form here, and the film is directed with real flair, with plenty of his trademark grimness. This is a film that’s often wince-inducing and blackly comic, sometimes at the same time. It has a real kineticism, and there’s some excellent setpieces, especially a third act car chase. But there’s also heart and I really brought the electic mix of characters, and Aronofsky deftly showcases the dirty, grimy nature of New York.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

4) Black Swan

black-swan-1200-1200-675-675-crop-000000

Black Swan was an important film for Aronofsky and it certainly elevated his oeuvre with a Best Director Oscar nomination. This is a dark, panic-inducing film that tackles a strangely hypnotic and hegemonically calm sport. Natalie Portman is electric as the titular character which she won an Oscar for and the cast is rounded out by Mila Kunis, Vincent Cassel, Barbara Hershey and Winona Ryder who all put in very convincing performances.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

 3) The Wrestler

wrestler1

The Wrestler is a subdued and melancholic investigation into its main character, played magnificently by Mickey Rourke in a comeback role. Rourke is outstanding as Randy ‘The Ram’ Robinson who is a calm yet determined character and Marisa Tomei co-stars here too in what is perhaps a career best performance for her. The Wrestler builds up to an outstanding conclusion and features outstanding cinematgraphy by Maryse Alberti, a departure from Matthew Libatique and a subtle yet memorable Clint Mansell score.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

2) Noah

noah

A passion project for Aronofsky, Noah is perhaps one of the most unconventional and controversial mainstream film of recent times. It delivers visually with some visceral action sequences and fantastical creatures yet is a strangely adult film for its 12 rating. It tackles some really controversial and hard to stomach themes and is in many ways, a morality tale. Russell Crowe is outstanding here as the titular character and across the board, the cast are brilliant with Emma Watson perhaps making the best impression as the barren Ila. Noah really narked audiences off and religious devotees but this is a really special film that goes against the grain and really delivers. And again, Clint Mansell’s score and Matthew Libatique’s cinematgraphy once again elevate the film.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

1) Requiem For A Dream

cgizadwstadsmjqsxgb8

Requiem For A Dream is my pick for my favourite Darren Aronofsky film and is perhaps one of my favourite films since 2000 so far. It is a hallucinogenic, nerve-wracking, depressing experience that will put anyone off narcotics far more effectively than a school drugs talk. Aronofsky experiments with form and imagery and Matthew Libatique’s cinematography is especially kinetic and unnerving. Clint Mansell’s score is one of the most haunting of our times and has gone on to inspire many other films. It is a note perfect film and doesn’t degrade on each rewatch. It is a masterpiece.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments or tweet @TheFilmMeister

 

 

Every 2025 Best Picture Oscar nominee ranked from best to worst

Rankings

The Academy Award nominations celebrating the films of 2024 have been announced and in this article, I’ll rank the Best Picture nominees in order of my own personal preference. The winners will be announced in the Oscars ceremony on 10th March 2025.

While 2024 was quite possibly the strongest field in many a year, unfortunately the selection for 2025 is incredibly weak. Amidst the sea of mediocrity is a truly terrible film and I would only consider four of the candidates Oscar-worthy. I suppose it’s inevitable that there was going to be a comedown after such a strong previous year. But there were some excellent films that should have made the cut: Hard Truths, Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, Gladiator II and Juror No. 2 to name but a few.

10) Emilia Pérez

Emilia Pérez isn’t just a bad Best Picture pick – it’s one of the worst films I’ve ever seen and is an utter calamity. The fact this has 13 Oscar nominations show just how out of touch the Academy are with reality. This is a woefully misguided and ugly-looking film with a terrible script, awful musical numbers and poor performances. It’s blandly directed by Jacques Audiard and the mashing of thriller, musical and crime genres just doesn’t work. Zoe Saldaña and Selena Gomez are fine actresses but they’re both terrible in this film (I can’t believe they’ve been nominated for their performances…!). Saldaña is totally emotionless and glum and Gomez overacts what is supposed to be an emotional arc her character undergoes. And then there’s Karla Sofia Gascón as the titular character, who the less said, the better. This is a frighteningly bad film and I’m not surprised Mexican audiences have been offended by its treatment of their country.

Rating: 1 out of 5.

9) Nickel Boys

Nickel Boys is RaMell Ross’ narrative feature directorial debut, previously known for his 2018 Oscar-nominated documentary Hale County This Morning, This Evening. An adaptation of the 2019 novel of the same name by Colson Whitehead, Nickel Boys tells the story story of Elwood Curtis (Ethan Herisse), a young African-American living in a segregated Tallahassee, Florida who finds himself at a reform school notorious for its abusive treatment of black students, through no fault of his own. There, he meets Turner (Brandon Wilson) and despite their initially opposite ideals, become friends. 

The film is shot in a first-person point-of-view so we see the plot unfold through the eyes of Elwood (the perspective is then shared with Turner in the film’s second half). That’s certainly an unconventional way to tell a story and stands Nickel Boys apart from more conventional historical drama biopics. Unfortunately, despite its novel filmmaking technique, I found Nickel Boys to be very dull and I think that first-person point-of-view decision is to blame. It detracts from the important story being told, which tackles some incredibly heavy themes, but the film never conveys its emotions. The stilted script doesn’t flow in a natural way and  and I found it very difficult to connect with any of the characters. None of the performances worked for me, even Hamish Linklater who made such a powerful impression in Midnight Mass. The film is also drastically overlong at 140 minutes and a generic title card revealing some images of the true events feels emotionally manipulative – especially for a film that’s trying to defy convention.  

Rating: 2 out of 5.

8) The Substance

The Substance is a satirical body horror, directed by Coralie Fargeat in her English language debut and it’s received quite the acclaim. The film follows fading Hollywood star Elisabeth Sparkle (Demi Moore) and we see her dismissed from her long-running television show due to her age. She’s intrigued by a black market serum, conveniently called ’The Substance’, which promises a “younger, more beautiful, more perfect” version of onself. But of course, any deal like this has its consequences which Sparkle comes to find. While The Substance is certainly original in its execution, I found it quite disappointing. For a film that runs in excess of 140 minutes, it doesn’t have a great deal to say and is very on-the-nose. The direction is extremely aggressive and in-your-face, which is clearly intentional but it just got on my nerves. The second half is particularly hard work, especially its go-for-broke ending which it doesn’t earn. The body horror did nothing for me and I don’t understand the comparisons many have made to David Cronenberg.  The major positives are the performances.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

7) Wicked

Wicked was much better than I expected – this is an ambitious and visually striking adaptation of the first act of the stage musical. Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande are both brilliant as the two witches, and the film details their friendship at Shiz University before the future arrival of Dorothy. At 160 minutes, it’s a meaty film but there’s a lot of interesting themes that director Jon M. Chu develops such as the relationship between humans and animals and what happens when you’re an outcast. Although musicals are generally not for me, I’lll admit there are some memorable numbers in this. That said, I think the film could have lost half an hour or so with a club sequence that doesn’t particularly add much to proceedings.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

6) Dune: Part Two

While there’s no doubting the visual flair on display, Dune: Part Two is a mixed bag and not as strong as its predecessor – by extension, it’s Denis Villeneuve’s weakest film. What really impressed me with Dune was how Villeneuve was able to maintain a clarity to the narrative, the key downfall of David Lynch’s film who overstuffed the entire book into a 137 minute film. And while that’s still largely the case here, Dune: Part Two runs into all manner of pacing issues. On the one hand, there’s some good world building for the first hour where ultimately not a lot happens. But then, but the film completely rushes through its climax during its last hour. The rushed pacing also comes at the expense of character development. I simply didn’t buy Paul (Timothée Chalamet) and Chani’s (Zendaya) blossoming relationship at the very centre of the film – it simply feels like we’re expected to invest in their relationship with no natural development. I wonder if it’s to do with the fact Eric Roth doesn’t write the script this time around, with Villeneuve himself stepping in to co-write with Jon Spaihts. It’s a shame Dune: Part Two doesn’t live up to the first film with its odd pacing and lack of character development. But it’s still a fun ride, with some above average elements, such as the black-and-white sequence on the Harkonnen planet, Austin Butler’s performance and some exciting action sequences here and there.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

5) Conclave

Based on a 2016 novel by Robert Harris, Conclave opens with the Pope dying of a heart attack and Cardinal Thomas Lawrence (Ralph Fiennes) is tasked with organising a papal conclave to elect a successor. However, Lawrence quickly finds himself investigating secrets and scandals about each of the candidates. They include Aldo Bellini (Stanley Tucci), an ambitious American liberal, Joseph Tremblay (John Lithgow), a Canadian moderate with a secret, Goffredo Tedesco (Sergio Castellitto), an Italian reactionary right-winger and Joseph Adeyemi (Lycian Msamati), a Nigerian candidate with homophobic views. Not dissimilar from many popular recent elections, Conclave is about deciding who is the least worst option and that’s what makes it rather entertaining. You’ll need to suspend disbelief (especially with its many twists) but if you’re after an overripe thriller filled with catty remarks, this delivers. Ralph Fiennes is reliably excellent as the overseer, who is also standing in the election and throughout the film, you’re constantly working out whether he has secret ambitions and if he’s as impartial as he should be. Sergio Castellitto, who was fantastic as the villainous King Miraz in The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian, turns his performance up to eleven as Tedesco and Isabella Rossellini also stands out as the head caterer and housekeeper who doesn’t have time for aimless chitchat. The jittery score by Volker Bertelmann (Hauschka) is fantastic and he crafts many memorable themes that add to the urgency of the election. Stéphane Fontaine lusciously shoots the film too, with excellent use of light and shadow to underscore the theme of corruption. But as entertaining as Conclave is, I’m not sure it’s quite the awards material it looks like it may become. 

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

4) A Complete Unknown

It may follow a conventional biopic structure, but I still found A Complete Unknown gripping from start to finish, with director James Mangold at the top of his game paired with many impressive performances. Here, Mangold tells the story of Bob Dylan, adapting a 2015 book by Elijah Wald called Dylan Goes Electric! which covers his earliest folk music success to his controversial use of electric instruments at the 1965 Newport Folk Festival. Mangold co-writes the script with Jay Cocks, his first since Martin Scorsese’s Silence. But straight from the opening scene, Mangold directs the film with a real warmth and energy and I loved the film’s tone. I especially liked its commentary on how genres evolve and how fellow artists support each other, even if that example isn’t followed by the public. It also has plenty to say on what it’s like to meet your idols. The film’s lusciously shot by Phedon Papamichael, and the production design of the 1960s is brilliantly captured. Timothée Chalamet is magnetic as Dylan, balancing the musician’s sheer talent while being somewhat impenetrable and unlikeable at times. The other standout’s Monica Barbaro as Joan Baez, who brings a real warmth to the singer and like Chalamet, also does all her own singing.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

3) Anora

The Palme D’Or winning new Sean Baker film proved a very memorable cinema experience. Other than Mikey Madison’s fantastic performance, I found the first 45 minutes of Anora really testing. But as soon as two men knock on a mansion door, the narrative takes a different direction and the rest of the 139 minute film had me grinning with its breathless fireball energy and wit. In retrospect, the first 45 minutes are needed to get you to despise the characters for the rest of it to work, so stay with it if you’re feeling the same way. It’s a film where characters are consistently pulled from pillar to post but there’s also a stark tenderness to its humanity and Baker portrays a vivid contrast between the rich and poor. It’s beautifully shot by Drew Daniels, who lends the film its disorientingly frenetic edge. Mikey Madison, who was one of Charles Manson’s accomplices in Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, is fantastic as Anora and thoroughly deserving of awards attention. She has bundles of empathy and despite her demeaning work selling her body, she knows how to get what she wants. Yura Borisov is also brilliant as Igor, a Russian henchman with morals with a similarly modest financial background as Anora who makes such an impression despite not having many lines. Karen Karagulian is brilliant as Toros, an Armenian handler, whose mania knows no bounds when his career is jeopardised. Anora is ultimately an excellent film from Sean Baker and quite possibly his best work.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

2) I’m Still Here

It was very hard to pick between first and second place but I’ve gone with I’m Still Here – a political biographical drama about a husband’s forced disappearance during the military dictatorship in Brazil and Walter Salles’ first film since 2012’s On The Road. It’s based on Marcelo Rubens Paiva’s 2015 memoir of the same name, Marcelo being the son of Rubens Paiva, who was the victim in question. Fernanda Torres places Eunice Paiva, Rubens’ wife and activist, with the film largely told from her perspective and how she struggles to cope emotionally and financially, while trying to raise her five children. I found I’m Still Here to be a deeply affecting and gripping piece of work, masterfully directed by Salles who skilfully contrasts the quiet family domesticity with the simmering and oppressive political horror. Although the film tells a story that happens in the past, I’m Still Here feels very contemporary with its mirroring of current dystopian events. The first hour is quite fast-paced, whereas the second is much slower but this is where the film really wraps its enchanting spell – it reminded me of Roma in many ways in terms of how it finds beauty in the mundane. The film’s complimented by a wonderful Warren Ellis score, which is very subdued in the first half but becomes more melodic later on. Fernanda Torres is just sensational as Eunice and fully deserving of her Best Actress Oscar nomination. She deftly balances her intelligence and frantic search for the truth while being as motherly as she can to her children. I absolutely loved I’m Still Here and found myself powerfully moved as the credits started to roll. 

Rating: 4 out of 5.

And the best film is…

1) The Brutalist

My top pick is The Brutalist, an epic period drama directed by Brady Corbet, who last made the excellent Vox Lux. Undeniably more ambitious in scope, Corbet’s latest spans over thirty years and a three and a half hour run time. Adrien Brody plays László Tóth, a Hungarian-Jewish Holocaust survivor and Bauhaus-trained architect who immigrates to America in search of a new life. The film isn’t perfect but The Brutalist is directed with real bravura and has a lot to say – although it’s about Tóth’s architectural career on the surface, there are plenty of parallels with the idea of how someone suffers for their art and how they are the person remembered rather than the entity throwing money at a project. Of course, that means there’s themes of compromise and interference and although its last 30 minutes may seem to take a different, seemingly incomprehensible tone, I found it very thought-provoking. Adrien Brody turns in a career-best performance as the suffering artist, nailing the Slavic accent and mannerisms – he’s fully deserving of his Best Actor nomination and he’s the clear winner. Guy Pearce is also a standout as the slimy financier in a very multi-faceted performance. Pearce is no stranger to playing villains – his deliciously evil turn in Lawlessis evidence of that – but this is a complex individual with all the qualities of someone who has too much money. Daniel Blumberg’s prickly score is wonderful, lending the film a simmering intensity and he crafts many memorable themes that develop throughout the film. The Brutalist is also beautifully shot by Lol Crawley, resurrecting the VistaVision process to authentically portray the period. It’s staggering how good the film looks, considering its modest $9.6 million budget and bearing in mind its epic run time. I was engrossed from start to finish.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Ranking the Planet of the Apes films from worst to best

Rankings

Planet of the Apes is one of the most enduring sci-fi franchises and for good reason – almost all of them explore morality-questioning themes that mirror our world. Coming off Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel, La Planète des singes, the series imagines a world where apes are the dominant species and humans are reduced to a savage, animal-like and mute state. 

There’s been 10 films so far, with an original pentalogy running from 1968 to 1973, in addition to a television series. A Tim Burton remake of the original followed in 2001 to a largely negative reception. Rise of the Planet of the Apes rebooted the series in 2011, with three further films following. 

Let’s take a look at the series and rank all of the entries. 

10) Planet of the Apes (2001) 

Tim Burton’s remake is unfortunately in last position, chiefly because it’s the only film in the series to not provide a commentary on society.  Instead, Burton’s film is simply an imagining of a planet of apes and that’s it. It’s not terrible but it could have been so much more. 

Mark Wahlberg is miscast and no match for Charlton Heston but Tim Roth makes for a menacing villain and Paul Giamatti’s clearly having fun too. Rick Baker’s makeup is a highlight and the apes are strikingly realised. Many have complained about the film’s final twist but I actually think it’s one of the most interesting elements in what’s a pretty rote film and admire it for being bonkers.  

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

9) Beneath the Planet of the Apes 

A disappointing sequel to the original but an like Burton’s remake, an utterly bonkers one. The first half of the film is essentially an amalgamation of the first, with astronaut Brent (James Franciscus) a less charismatic and less talented Charlton Heston. 

The second half is where the film erratically veers as we head into The Forbidden Zone, where a group of telepathic human survivors live who worship a nuclear bomb. This all culminates in a truly bleak ending, a direction that surely no Hollywood studio would ever let a filmmaker take now. 

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

8) Dawn of the Planet of the Apes 

The controversial placing of this list, I don’t understand all the love for the second film in the reboot trilogy. Matt Reeves’ first outing in the director’s chair is visually stunning and Andy Serkis continues to mature as Caesar. There’s also a palpable tension in the first half as the humans and apes figure out how to live alongside one another in relative peace. 

But the story is surprisingly simplistic and extremely predictable. There’s not much to latch onto emotionally with the human characters and the film would also have benefitted from a tighter edit.  

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

7) Battle for the Planet of the Apes 

Often regarded as the worst of the original pentalogy, yes Battle for the Planet of the Apes isn’t the most lavish production with its titular battle mainly set in a field. But there’s a lot of substance here. 

Roddy McDowall is brilliant as Caesar and the development of the apes where we see them at the start of the film compared to Conquest of the Planet of the Apes feels very natural. The conflict of ‘ape shall never kill ape’ is explored more convincingly here than in Dawn of the Planet of the Apes and Aldo (Claude Akins) makes for a multi-faceted villain.  

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

6) Conquest of the Planet of the Apes 

The first of the original pentalogy to have Roddy McDowall leading as Caesar, this is a particularly dark outing of pure rage and revolution. A filmmaker wouldn’t be allowed to treat a series that has to also appeal to the younger generation like director J. Lee Thompson managed to get away with here. 

As Caesar struggles to come to terms with how terribly apes are treated by humans, he sets about teaching the other apes to resist their masters and it all culminates in a violent and impassioned final act. Don Murray makes for a particularly sinister villain and Hari Rhodes shines  as Breck’s chief aide, an African American who is able to sympathise with the apes. 

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

5) Escape from the Planet of the Apes 

The ending of Beneath the Planet of the Apes didn’t leave many options on how to narratively continue the series, so why not fly back through time to the past? Escape starts out as a much lighter film than the previous entries as the Cornelius and Zira (Roddy McDowall and Kim Hunter) are treated as celebrities but soon shows it darker hand as the cruelty of humanity enters the fray. 

This is a brilliant and tightly edited series entry with a sharp script by Paul Dehn and the performances across the board are excellent. It all culminates in a particularly distressing ending that closes an old chapter and teases an exciting new one. 

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

4) Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes

Set nearly 300 years after War for the Planet of the Apes, director Wes Ball impresses with this intelligent and mature fourth installment. The decision to explore how a key figure’s teaching have been twisted after a period of time is a genius move and I love how Ball advances the aesthetic and tone of the series – gone are the predominantly forested surroundings of Dawn and War and its road movie influence feels closer to the original pentalogy.   

Owen Teague proves an excellent lead as Noa and Kevin Durand’s Proximus Caesar is one of the most memorable villains of the series. There’s some fantastic setpieces too, bolstered by a memorable score by John Paesano. 

Rating: 4 out of 5.

3) War for the Planet of the Apes

Although I found Dawn to be overrated, director Matt Reeves got it right on the second go. This is a grim, heartfelt, revenge-filled and morality-questioning closing chapter to Caesar’s trilogy. There are many prolonged sequences where War almost feels like a silent film and it’s just stunning to behold. 

Andy Serkis gives his best performance as Caesar, now capable of speaking pretty much fluent English and Woody Harrelson makes for a particularly nasty piece of work as the Colonel. The score by Michael Giacchino is perhaps a career-best and it’s lusciously shot by Michael Seresin.  

Rating: 4 out of 5.

2) Planet of the Apes (1968)

Franklin J. Schaffner’s original is still the best of the original series and one of the best sci-fi pieces of all time. Michael Wilson and Rod Serling’s script is particularly tightly written, exploring many fascinating themes and ideologies. They show particular restraint in not introducing the apes until a good third of the way in, complimented by Leon Shamroy’s paranoid cinematography and Jerry Goldsmith’s eclectic score. 

Charlton Heston makes for a terrific lead and despite many of the ape’s cruelty, all of them are similarly well-developed and we can sympathise from different perspectives. The iconic ending is still devastating and it fully deserves its rich legacy. 

Rating: 4 out of 5.

1) Rise of the Planet of the Apes 

Although many would still rate the 1968 original as the pinnacle of the series, Rise of the Planet of the Apes is an astonishing achievement and a better-paced, more emotional film. The series was dead in the water after Tim Burton fumbled his remake and what better way to reboot it than to start right back at the beginning? 

Andy Serkis is sensational as Caesar, in a role he would go onto further develop across two more films. What sets this entry apart are the human characters – James Franco and Freida Pinto are excellent leads and John Lithgow lends a lot of heart to proceedings as Franco’s dementia-ridden father. Tom Felton and David Oyelowo are brilliant as the villains that incite the ape onslaught and the film’s beautifully shot by Andrew Lesnie. Patrick Doyle’s score is very memorable and the final act that culminates on a battle on the Golden Gate Bridge is a sheer assault on the senses.   

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

Every Kung Fu Panda film ranked from worst to best

Rankings

Kung Fu Panda is one of DreamWorks Animation’s most enduring series and it’s no surprise considering how much heart and humour the films have. It’s difficult to resist Jack Black’s giant panda Po, who is improbably chosen as the Dragon Warrior in the original film and slowly becomes a master of kung fu, leading the Furious Five, a quintet of legendary warriors. As the series progress, we see Po develop and DreamWorks’ franchise has spawned four mainline films, three television series and six short films.

With Kung Fu Panda 4 arriving into cinemas after almost a decade’s hiatus, let’s see how the films rank.

4) Kung Fu Panda 4

The latest in the series is unfortunately the weakest but Kung Fu Panda 4 is still good fun. Directed by Mike Mitchell (who coincidently also made the fourth Shrek film, Shrek Forever After), this still has most of the heart of the earlier entries but it’s not as consistently funny. In the film, Po must select and train his Dragon Warrior successor, but the cuddly panda doesn’t want to hold up the mantle just yet, especially since an evil sorceress called The Chameleon (Viola Davis) tries to steal the kung fu abilities of deceased figures. Kung Fu Panda 4‘s key mistake is sidelining the Furious Five, who only appear in a brief cameo towards the end of the film and that robs the film of a lot of chemistry. Still, there’s some good messages here, specifically about what it means to be an outcast and Awkwafina’s streetwise thieving fox makes for a good double-act with Po’s panda. There’s an excellent sequence in a bandit bar which is full of slapstick and Davis’ villain is quite strong.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

3) Kung Fu Panda 3

Although it’s more slight than previous entries, there’s a lot of heart in Kung Fu Panda 3 and it’s undeniably the best-looking film of the quadrilogy with its stunning vistas. This third installment picks up immediately after the second and Po is reunited with his birth father, Li Shan (Bryan Cranston) who takes him to a secret Panda village to prepare to fight against General Kai (J. K. Simmons). I particularly enjoyed the interplay between Li Shan and Po’s loveable adoptive goose father Mr Ping (James Hong) and it’s great that Dustin Hoffman’s Master Shifu is given more to do this time round, after being largely absent from Kung Fu Panda 2. This threequel also boasts the best score of the series, with Hans Zimmer melding the themes he previously established with John Powell previously with some exciting new pieces, especially the villainous Kai’s theme.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

2) Kung Fu Panda 2

While many consider Kung Fu Panda 2 to be the highlight of the series, it lands in second place for me. It’s undoubtedly the most emotional of the four, with a breathtakingly emotional sequence on Po’s origins and the influences of executive producer Guillermo del Toro’s works are clear. Gary Oldman makes for a terrific villain, Lord Shen, a slender peacock with more brains than brawn over Tai Lung in the original film. But it doesn’t quite top the list for me because it’s missing the interplay between Po and Master Shifu (who is absent through large stretches of the film) and the film’s a little baggy in its pacing. Still, one has to admire director Jennifer Yuh’s ambition in not just repeating the beats that worked from the original.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

1) Kung Fu Panda

The original is still the best and there’s a ton of laughs mixed with plenty of emotion in Kung Fu Panda. Jack Black’s Po is brilliant, an unlikely candidate for the Dragon Warrior who undergoes quite the character arc while having plenty of clever parallels with film staples in the kung fu and wuxia genres. Dustin Hoffman’s Master Shifu is a real highlight and the interplay between Po and Shifu is what really makes the film work, as well as the introduction of the Furious Five. The final action sequence is particularly brilliant, full of energy and laughs as Po dukes it out with the villainous Tai Lung (Ian McShane). It’s no surprise that Kung Fu Panda spawned a successful series.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Denis Villeneuve Films Ranked From Worst To Best

Rankings

French-Canadian film director Denis Villeneuve exploded onto the big screen in 2010 with Incendies, earning an Academy Award nomination for Best Foreign Language film, putting the filmmaker firmly on the roadmap.

He then made the transition to English-language films with thrillers Prisoners, Enemy and Sicario, all receiving a very positive reception. More recently, Villeneuve has expanded into sci-fi with Arrival earning him a Best Director Oscar nomination, before tackling the behemoths Blade Runner 2049 and Dune.

With the director’s gradual rise in stature, many now compare him with Christopher Nolan for his similarly heady ideas and meticulous attention to detail. With the hotly anticipated Dune: Part Two arriving in cinemas, here is a list of his films ranked worst to best.

Please note this list does not include August 32nd on Earth, Maelström or Polytechnique.

8) Dune: Part Two

Unfortunately, Villeneuve’s latest is his worst. While there’s no doubting the visual flair on display, Dune: Part Two is a mixed bag and not as strong as its predecessor. What really impressed me with Dune was how Villeneuve was able to maintain a clarity to the narrative, the key downfall of David Lynch’s film who overstuffed the entire book into a 137 minute film. And while that’s still largely the case here, Dune: Part Two runs into all manner of pacing issues. On the one hand, there’s some good world building for the first hour where ultimately not a lot happens. But then, but the film completely rushes through its climax during its last hour. The rushed pacing also comes at the expense of character development. I simply didn’t buy Paul (Timothée Chalamet) and Chani’s (Zendaya) blossoming relationship at the very centre of the film – it simply feels like we’re expected to invest in their relationship with no natural development. I wonder if it’s to do with the fact Eric Roth doesn’t write the script this time around, with Villeneuve himself stepping in to co-write with Jon Spaihts. 

It’s a shame Dune: Part Two doesn’t live up to the first film with its odd pacing and lack of character development. But it’s still a fun ride, with some above average elements, such as the black-and-white sequence on the Harkonnen planet, Austin Butler’s performance and some exciting action sequences here and there.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

7) Incendies

Villeneuve’s highest-profile French-language film earned the director his big break with an Academy Award nomination for Best Foreign Language Film. Incendies follows two Canadian twins who travel to their mother’s native country to uncover her hidden past, with the film heavily influenced by the Lebanese Civil War. Mélissa Désormeaux-Poulin stands out as Jeanne Marwan, the daughter of mother Marwan (Lubna Azabal), who throws herself head first into the investigation, while her short-tempered brother Simon (Maxim Gaudette) wants nothing to do with proceedings. The film is quite unlike Villeneuve’s later works in tone but there’s no denying the powerful cinematography by André Turpin, especially how he captures the unnamed foreign country and its war-torn past. The use of Radiohead’s You and Whose Army in the opening sequence is also masterful. But the plot has its fair share of contrivances that I found problematic, which mean a disturbing twist late into the film doesn’t land quite as effectively as it should.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

6) Blade Runner 2049

Blade Runner 2049 is frequently mesmerising to behold on-screen and Villeneuve’s intention towards the project is impressive. Technically, the film is a marvel to behold bolstered by its strong performances. However, it is not quite the victorious slam dunk I expected it to be on the strengths of Villeneuve’s previous works. A lot of this masterful director’s trademarks aren’t immediately apparent in the film due to Villeneuve emulating Ridley Scott’s direction of the first film a little too closely. The film is also overlong and frequently emotionally lacking. Without trying to sound too critical of the film, it is testament to how strongly I regard Villeneuve as a director and the subsequent expectations I had going into this film. Blade Runner 2049 is generally a very strong sequel but like its predecessor, requires time and repeat viewings to further ascertain its quality and lasting impression.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

5) Enemy

Enemy is an often underlooked work by Villeneuve, who reteams with Jake Gyllenhaal. Clearly inspired by Lynch and Kafka, Enemy is an intense, thoroughly unconventional exploration into the theme of the doppelgänger. It requires multiple rewatches to truly unpack and appreciate its confusing narrative. The ending is jaw-dropping and reframes the film in a different perspective and continues to be debated to this day. The film’s brilliantly paced and doesn’t waste a second of its tight 90 minute run time and it’s vividly shot by Nicolas Bolduc, with an unnerving score by Danny Bensi and Saunder Jurriaans. While Enemy might not be as accessible as some of Villeneuve’s other works, it’s a thoroughly thrilling ride if you can get on board with its heady premise.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

4) Dune

As a property, Dune has experienced a particularly hard life in a filmmaker being able to successfully transpose the novel from the page to the screen, Alejandro Jodorowsky dubbing it as ‘unfilmable’ and David Lynch’s 1984 film yielding mixed results. Villeneuve cracks the code though with his adaptation. The decision to split the adaptation into two is an excellent one and the film especially impresses in how it skilfully spins a coherent narrative that is relatively straightforward enough to follow. Villeneuve’s adaptation is particularly cine-literate and the world-building is remarkable. The film is particularly strong in its first act, as it sets the stage for conflict and establishes its sizeable roster of characters. The second and third acts become increasingly action-heavy and build on the spectacle. The performances all-around are excellent, although there are some characters who are short-changed that will have a greater presence in a second film. On that note, it was a courageous decision to film Dune, with the uncertainty of a second film being commissioned to adapt the second half of the story.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

3) Arrival

Arrival is masterfully constructed by Villeneuve and its first two thirds is particularly gripping. The performances are strong here too and the film’s beautifully shot by Bradford Young. However, Arrival bites off a bit more than it can chew in its last third and although the film is still very interesting and original, it begins to derail and struggles towards its ending. This is a film that needs to be watched blindly but I felt the film leaves a lot of questions unanswered with some holes to its logic. Like other Villeneuve works, this is a film that warrants multiple rewatches. For a sci-fi, it’s a film that’s very low on action and big set-pieces and is not too dissimilar thematically from films such as Contact or Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

2) Sicario

Sicario is a near-perfect film that features some heart pounding action sequences and excellent performances, most notably from Benicio Del Toro who delivers a career-best performance as the enigmatic Alejandro. Villeneuve’s direction is superb and he has created a very gloomy, dark film that is extremely intense. The film’s brilliantly shot by Roger Deakins and there’s a sensational score by Jóhann Jóhannsson, which is extremely moody and memorable. I also highly recommend its sequel, Sicario 2: Soldado, if you get on with this, although Villeneuve didn’t return in the director’s chair.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

And the best Denis Villeneuve film is…

1) Prisoners

Prisoners is not just my favourite Villeneuve film, but also one of my favourite films of all time – it is a masterpiece and had such a profound effect on me when I first viewed it on release in 2013. Villeneuve’s English-language debut is a harrowing, dark account of the kidnapping of a young girl and the subsequent investigation that ensues. Hugh Jackman plays the father, Keller Dover, whose multi-layered, fragmented character goes to extreme lengths to protect his family and uncover the identity of the kidnapper. This perfect film also features a brilliant score by Jóhann Jóhannsson which is endlessly haunting and is stunningly shot by Roger Deakins, who earned an Oscar nomination for his work. For Jackman’s sake, he’s overshadowed slightly by Jake Gyllenhaal, who also puts in a career-best performance as Detective Loki. I’d love for Villeneuve to return to smaller-budget thriller fare because the results speak for themselves.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments or tweet @TheFilmMeister

Ranking The Best Picture Nominees Of The 96th Annual Academy Awards

Rankings

The Academy Award nominations celebrating the films of 2023 have been announced and in this article, I’ll rank the Best Picture nominees in order of my own personal preference. The winners will be announced in the Oscar’s ceremony on 10th March 2024.

In my opinion, this is the strongest set of nominations in quite some time with seven brilliant films out of ten. I have to cast my mind back all the way to 2016 for a collection of films of similar quality (although I think 2023’s are still more consistent). 2019 was also a decent year, with three brilliant Best Picture nominees otherwise buried in a sea of mediocrity.

Let’s get started… 

10) Maestro

Every year, there is at least one (if not multiple) undeserving Awards films and for 2024, that honour goes to MaestroMaestro is the sophomore writer-director effort by actor Bradley Cooper, after A Star Is Born (2018) which earned lots of awards love. Conversely, I didn’t think his remake was up to much, despite Lady Gaga’s committed performance. Cooper moves to Netflix for Maestro, a biopic about composer Leonard Bernstein covering his conducting debut at the New York Philharmonic in 1943 to 1987, nine years after the death of his wife, Felicia Montealegre. 

Bradley Cooper is so infatuated with himself, so hungry for Awards success that he doesn’t tell anything meaningful about Bernstein at all. The film is completely inert of energy and a real chore to sit through for its extended 129 minute run time. While Cooper may look like Bernstein with a fake schnozz and wrinkles, he’s just playing himself. Even Carey Mulligan, who generally shines in everything she’s in, fails to make much of an impression as Felicia Montealegre, because the film doesn’t dig into the psyche of her character at all. Rather miserably, the only scene I felt anything for her character is when she is diagnosed with cancer. The chemistry between Cooper and Mulligan is non-existent. The decision to race through the composer’s first 15 years in 45 minutes and then stay fixated on a shorter period throughout the rest of the film is an odd decision. Even Matthew Libatique, Darren Aronofsky’s preferred cinematographer, fails to inject his signature personality into the film. 

Rating: 1 out of 5.

9) Barbie

Barbie has a well-paced and energetic first half. Unfortunately, the latter half struggles in incorporating too many ideas are thrown and I found its message overly preachy. Starting with the positives, director Greta Gerwig explores some interesting themes, including existentialism and the impact both Barbie and Ken have had on modern culture. There are obvious references to Groundhog DayToy Story, The Wizard of Oz and The Lego Movie in its storyline and I also appreciated Gerwig’s personal and loving nods to her Sacramento roots, which also worked wonders for Lady Bird. Despite its 12A rating, Barbie isn’t particularly suitable for children and I suspect most of the themes and jokes will go over their heads. There’s some great performances here too. Margot Robbie is perfectly cast as the titular character, deftly balancing the likeability, humour and pathos needed for the crisis she undergoes.  Even Helen Mirren’s satirical narration points to her suitability. 

The film’s second half just didn’t work for me. It introduces too many ideas and ties itself in knots and it struck me as preachy in tone. In fact, there is one character who delivers an extended speech late into the film about what it means to be a woman in current society which although inspirational, is incredibly heavy-handed. It doesn’t leave any room for nuance whatsoever. While its exploration of gender is interesting on the surface, the resolution the film ultimately reaches borders on unsettling and sexist. Barbie is the first film to be directed by Gerwig where she has collaborated with another individual on the script, in this case her partner and fellow filmmaker Noah Baumbach. While I can tolerate Marriage Story, I’ve not been a fan of the vast majority of Baumbach’s filmography. The film feels as if Gerwig was in charge of the film’s first half, with Baumbach piloting the second, although this isn’t necessarily the case. 

Rating: 3 out of 5.

8) Past Lives

Past Lives is the directorial debut of Celine Song and follows the relationship of two childhood friends over the course of 24 years, as they lead different lives. It’s certainly an original piece and the relationship between both Nora (Greta Lee) and Hae Sung (Teo Yoo) is nicely developed, with both actors turning in excellent performances. The film’s also handsomely shot on 35mm film by cinematographer Shabier Kirchner. But I never found Past Lives to be as affecting as others have raved it to be and it’s a little sluggishly paced in places. The score by Christopher Bear and Daniel Rossen also aggressively didn’t work for me.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

7) American Fiction

American Fiction is the directorial debut of Cord Jefferson, a satirical comedy-drama adapted from Percival Everett’s 2001 novel Erasure. It’s a highly entertaining literary comedy with a blisteringly sharp script that in some ways, feels like a film a more muted Spike Lee would make. This is a tough genre to crack and there have been far more failures than hits but I genuinely laughed quite a few times at this. There’s also more than a few kernels of truth about the publishing industry and what it means to be a writer, exploring the highs and lows of both the creative process and critical reception. But Jefferson deftly balances his commentary on the media with a heartfelt treatment of the themes of loneliness and family. The family drama element of the film is equally riveting, with the treatment of Alzheimers touching and the mundane but necessary tasks of trying to get someone into a home. There’s some terrific performances here too, especially Jeffrey Wright who’s always been a reliable screen presence but doesn’t often take the lead role. Wright nails the prickly, depressing nature of his character as he struggles to fit in and open up to people but with an almost lovable quality. 

Rating: 4 out of 5.

6) The Zone of Interest

The Zone of Interest is director Jonathan Glazer’s new film, an uncomfortably long eleven year wait after Under The Skin. 11 years in the making, the film tells the story of Rudolf Höss, the longest-serving commandant of the Auschwitz concentration camp, where he lived with his wife Hedwig (Sandra Hüller) in what they perceived as their idyllic home. Small catch – the garden wall with barbed wire atop it is shared with Auschwitz. 

The Zone of Interest is a fiercely original work from Glazer that’s uncomfortable viewing and really gets under your skin. The film possibly represents the most important use of sound I can think of in quite some time – the sound of the droning concentration camp with its whirring machinery is ever-present during mundane conversation and day-to-day life. Glazer never shows us the atrocities inside the camp and what we hear beyond the frame is another film in itself. I loved the surreal elements too, particularly a storyline shot with thermal cameras. Christian Friedel is sensational as the despicable SS officer – a cold, calculated yet frank and career-driven individual. His whole life becomes an obsession into how fast he can kill and there’s an everyday quality to the terrible schemes he is complicit in, which makes the film all the more chilling. The film is masterfully shot by Loving Vincent and Cold War cinematographer Łukasz Żal, an incredible shot of a chimney through a window that’s reflected on the glass will forever be ingrained in my memory. Mica Levi’s score, although sparse, is also deeply effective. Save for two doom-laden tracks at the beginning and end, the rest of the film uses more of a soundscape except for a recurring motif during the surreal sequences.  

Rating: 4 out of 5.

5) Anatomy of a Fall

Anatomy of a Fall is a fascinating character study of a family, the couple at its centre and the legal system that tries to break Sandra and her son apart. It’s a smart film that’s simmering with tension and excellent performances, although I’m confident it would pack an even greater wallop if it was tighter. Sandra Hüller is terrific in the lead role and is fully deserving of the praise she has been lauded. Her character is a matter-of-fact, frank individual and director Justine Triet delves into the idea that writers use those around them to bolster their image. Swann Arlaud is also brilliant as Sandra’s silver fox lawyer, Vincent Renzi, as is Antoine Reinartz as a particularly nasty prosecutor. He unpicks anything and everything Sandra or other persons called up to the bar say, constantly repurposing words as evidence of Sandra’s guilt. Although there isn’t an original score, the use of music is terrific and the recurring use of 50 Cent’ P.I.M.P. and Daniel’s piano recitals are chillingly effective. The film’s also beautifully shot by Simon Beaufils, who evocatively captures the high altitude setting of the chalet and likes to zoom in on certain minutiae, as if you’re a fly-on-the-wall. 

Rating: 4 out of 5.

4) The Holdovers

The Holdovers is the new Alexander Payne film and his first since 2017’s Downsizing. Payne reunites with his Sideways lead Paul Giamatti who stars as Paul Hunham, a strict classics teacher at Barton Academy, a New England boarding school that he attended back in his youth. The Holdovers is Payne at his best and is a tender delight from start to finish, but it deftly balances its warmth with a bittersweet tone. The performances are terrific all around, especially Giamatti, and the film perfectly evokes classic 1970’s cinema with its intentionally rustic aesthetic – it looks and feels like a work made at the time. It’s beautifully shot by In Bruges cinematographer Eigil Bryld, especially the wintry landscapes during the opening credits and some disorienting frames that feature late into the film. Paul Giamatti turns in what I’d probably consider a career-best performance as Hunham. Hunham is both lovable and loathsome and an easy character to relate to with the hardships he’s faced in life. In fact, there are many similarities between Hunham and Miles Raymond, the character Giamatti plays in Sideways, both characters that have been hard done-by in life.

I absolutely loved The Holdovers and was completely swept up by the film throughout, with its intelligent script and committed performances. It’s Payne’s best film since Sideways and I predict it will become a Christmas classic, with its perfectly judged bittersweet tone. They certainly don’t make films like this anymore.    

Rating: 4 out of 5.

3) Poor Things

Poor Things is Lanthimos back on track (I thought The Favourite was flawed) with a brilliantly twisted, uncomfortable yet multi-layered triumph. There’s so much going on here, both from a thematic and visual standpoint and it’ll take multiple rewatches to fully understand its message but it’s a film that gets better on each viewing. Lanthimos recaptures his bizarre yet oddly moving tone, which is what made his earlier efforts really shine, combined with lavish yet evocative production design. Robbie Ryan’s cinematography is a career-best, with every frame a painting worth pausing to analyse, which is interesting considering some of his work can be quite vanilla. The film boldly experiments with colour and perspectives are often shot through a fish-eye lens and it’s supported by the lavish production design. I also loved the retrofuturistic vision, with the Victorian London setting contrasting with succeeding elements.

Emma Stone turns in a career-best performance as the Frankenstein-like Bella Baxter, who opens the film as an inquisitive and brash child and ends as a self-made woman. I’ve sometimes struggled with her performances in the past and couldn’t believe she won the Best Actress Oscar for La La Land but not so here. Willem Dafoe is also reliably brilliant as the eccentric surgeon, who has to belch bubbles at the dinner table due to a health condition. Mark Ruffalo provides much of the comic relief as Wedderburn, who becomes increasingly child-like as the film progresses, although his British accent is rather wandery. The Killing of a Sacred Deer remains Lanthimos’ best work, in my opinion, but Poor Things is fully deserving of its praise and is a sensational experience to begin the year. 

Rating: 4 out of 5.

2) Killers of the Flower Moon

Killers of the Flower Moon is the latest by Martin Scorsese and an adaptation of David Grann’s 2017 non-fiction novel of the same name. The book is a must-read and tells the sickly story of how the Osage community are systematically murdered in the 1920s after oil is discovered on their tribal land. Killers of the Flower Moon is, for the most part, an excellent adaptation. It earns its 206 minute run time with its sprawling, fascinating story and Scorsese takes his time to develop the characters. He immerses you in the terror felt by the Osage, that no-one is safe on their own land with greedy wolves scheming from every corner. I was particularly impressed how like in The Irishman, Scorsese presents the horror in quite an understated way, raw and fact-of-life. Although a revisionist Western first and foremost, there’s still many of Scorsese’s gangster elements to be found, from fatally flawed men to America’s founding myths.  Of course, being a Scorsese picture, the film has real big screen beauty and is handsomely shot by regular cinematographer Rodrigo Prieto. He gorgeously captures the expansive Oklahoma vistas and holds onto a shot for uncomfortably long during heinous murders. The stunning cinematography and assured direction is paired with a haunting, bluesy final soundtrack by Robbie Robertson (who sadly passed away in August). A heartbeat motif that is repeated throughout the film is particularly effective, lending a feverish quality. 

Rating: 4 out of 5.

1) Oppenheimer

Oppenheimer is a tension-fuelled, thought-provoking minor-key masterpiece and is straight up there with director Christopher Nolan’s best work. It’s an incredibly rich piece of work and it left me feeling stone-cold with its characters haunting deliberation over the consequences of their work. This is a largely dialogue-heavy film for its lengthy three hour running time and except a breathtaking sequence depicting the Trinity test (even more impressive considering the minimal CGI), is largely bereft of action. Cillian Murphy has often represented one of the mechanisms to a successful Nolan film, and steps up to the lead role for Oppenheimer. His performance is simply sensational and a career-best. Oppenheimer is stacked with A-list actors, with Emily Blunt and Robert Downey Jr other notable highlights. The film is beautifully shot by now-Nolan regular Hoyte van Hoytema and Ludwig Göransson’s score is the glue that holds the film together. 

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

Best Films of 2023 (10-1)

Rankings, Year In Film

This is the second part of my Best Films of 2023. I previously ran you through my best films of 2023 (20-11) and here, I unveil my top ten.

10) The Covenant

Guy Ritchie’s most mature film in years is a triumph with Jake Gyllenhaal reliably brilliant as Master Sergeant John Kinley, who after his unit are ambushed by the Taliban and his interpreter is killed, is teamed with Dar Salim’s Ahmed. This is a thrilling action drama from Ritchie with surprising restraint, considering his back catalogue, with some nail-biting action sequences and a pulse-raising score by Christopher Benstead. Both Kinley and Ahmed are well-developed and rounded characters and I really brought their friendship. If there’s a downside to the film, it has a rather Americanised ending but its intensity is still to be commended. It’s Ritchie’s best film since The Gentlemen.

9) Anatomy Of A Fall

Anatomy of a Fall is a fascinating character study of a family, the couple at its centre and the legal system that tries to break Sandra and her son apart. It’s a smart film that’s simmering with tension and excellent performances, although I’m confident it would pack an even greater wallop if it was tighter. Sandra Hüller is terrific in the lead role and is fully deserving of the praise she has been lauded. Her character is a matter-of-fact, frank individual and director Justine Triet delves into the idea that writers use those around them to bolster their image. Swann Arlaud is also brilliant as Sandra’s silver fox lawyer, Vincent Renzi, as is Antoine Reinartz as a particularly nasty prosecutor. He unpicks anything and everything Sandra or other persons called up to the bar say, constantly repurposing words as evidence of Sandra’s guilt. Although there isn’t an original score, the use of music is terrific and the recurring use of 50 Cent’ P.I.M.P. and Daniel’s piano recitals are chillingly effective. The film’s also beautifully shot by Simon Beaufils, who evocatively captures the high altitude setting of the chalet and likes to zoom in on certain minutiae, as if you’re a fly-on-the-wall. 

8) May December

I’ve never fully got on the Todd Haynes hype train but May December is the film that’s converted me – I was enthralled from start to finish. The film is loosely inspired by the Mary Kay Letourneau scandal where the then-34 year old had a sexual relationship with 12-year-old Vili Fualaau. The characters are renamed and the story framed around Natalie Portman’s Elizabeth Berry as an actress who’s about to play the older woman in an upcoming film, played by Julianne Moore. May December isn’t interested at all in unpicking the how’s and why’s of what happened. Haynes refreshingly chooses to focus on the dark and tangled obsessions of its characters and how they mirror each other. The film is seeping in details to unpick and there are many different possible readings, which make it all the more satisfying. It’s brilliantly paced with a sharp script by Samy Burch which deftly balances the camp and unease. Perfectly complimenting the film is a peppery score by Marcelo Zarvos, who reuses Michael Legrand’s whirlwind-like themes from The Go-Between but develops them beautifully. 

7) Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret

Kelly Fremon Craig’s adaptation of the 1970 novel of the same name is an utterly charming coming-of-age comedy drama that has plenty of laughs matched with real heart. The film is refreshingly frank about a girl’s journey through puberty and the director nails the uneasy but realistic conversations Margaret has with her friends. Abby Ryder Fortson is revelatory as the titular Margaret and Rachel McAdams is equally impressive as her mother, Barbara. Kathy Bates shines as her grandmother, Sylvia and Hans Zimmer’s score is uncharacteristically stripped back.

6) The Son

I never expected to like director Florian Zeller’s follow-up to The Father as much as I did, given the negative reception and the fact I had serious reservations regarding his debut. However, The Son really worked for me and follows Peter Miller (Hugh Jackman), who’s trying to juggle his marriage with his second wife Beth (Vanessa Kirby) while raising their newborn baby and his depressed 17-year-old son, Nicholas (Zen McGrath), from his previous marriage. This is an utterly devastating account of depression, with Peter constantly stuck between a rock and a hard place, on the one hand wanting to be a model father and move on from his own childhood trauma with his own cruel father (Anthony Hopkins). Jackman is reliably terrific in the lead, with strong work also from Kirby and McGrath and I was glued to the screen from start to finish. If there’s a film out there that warns you about the dangers of depression, this is it, akin to how Requiem For A Dream is the model film to put you off recreational drug use.

5) Beau Is Afraid

Beau Is Afraid is easily the most confounding cinematic experience I have had in quite some time. It’s a fiercely original effort – a sprawling, paranoia-inducing epic with more than its fair share of Kafka-inspired horror infused with Charlie Kaufman surrealism and a dose of Darren Aronofsky’s mother!. As you’d expect from an Ari Aster film, it’s overflowing in symbolism and requires multiple viewings to better understand its meaning. This isn’t a film that will ever be truly understood, but after two viewings, there is a ton to unpack. A beautiful animated sequence towards the close of the film’s second act is particularly affecting. Joaquin Phoenix is phenomenal as Beau, effortlessly flitting between being pathetic  the line between pathetic – crazed emotions, stunts, panic, confusion. Aster’s regular cinematographer Pawel Pogorzelski’s moody cinematography is stunning, an individual once again at the top of his game, and there’s a satisfyingly sickly score from Midsommar‘s Bobby Krlic.

4) John Wick: Chapter 4

John Wick: Chapter 4 is yet another strong entry in the series and its second half is particularly impressive, especially considering the intimidating 169 minute run time. It tells a clear and coherent story and there are real, life-threatening stakes for the characters. The film feels like a sprawling, ultra-violent James Bond film on steroids and mostly earns its length. As you’d expect, Chapter 4 sports some truly mesmerising action sequences that are straight up there as some of the best in the series and a model for action cinema in general. Keanu Reeves once again turns in an excellent performance as the titular character. Bill Skarsgård makes for what is probably the most formidable villain of the series to date and Donnie Yen is clearly having fun as a likeable old friend of Wick, who is forced out of retirement to kill him.

John Wick: Chapter 4 is a fantastic sequel and a genre-defining film for action cinema. It’s a globe-trotting stunt showcase from beginning to end that mostly earns its length and its second half is a tour-de-force. It’s certainly the best sequel of the franchise, although I’m not sure if it betters the original. It’s rare to see a series improve with each entry, although Chapter 4 ends on a fitting note and I hope Stahelski and Reeves aren’t tempted to risk making another. 

3) Killers of the Flower Moon

Killers of the Flower Moon is the latest by Martin Scorsese and an adaptation of David Grann’s 2017 non-fiction novel of the same name. The book is a must-read and tells the sickly story of how the Osage community are systematically murdered in the 1920s after oil is discovered on their tribal land. Killers of the Flower Moon is, for the most part, an excellent adaptation. It earns its 206 minute run time with its sprawling, fascinating story and Scorsese takes his time to develop the characters. He immerses you in the terror felt by the Osage, that no-one is safe on their own land with greedy wolves scheming from every corner. I was particularly impressed how like in The Irishman, Scorsese presents the horror in quite an understated way, raw and fact-of-life. Although a revisionist Western first and foremost, there’s still many of Scorsese’s gangster elements to be found, from fatally flawed men to America’s founding myths.  Of course, being a Scorsese picture, the film has real big screen beauty and is handsomely shot by regular cinematographer Rodrigo Prieto. He gorgeously captures the expansive Oklahoma vistas and holds onto a shot for uncomfortably long during heinous murders. The stunning cinematography and assured direction is paired with a haunting, bluesy final soundtrack by Robbie Robertson (who sadly passed away in August). A heartbeat motif that is repeated throughout the film is particularly effective, lending a feverish quality. 

2) Babylon

A misunderstood masterpiece, Damien Chazelle’s epic comedy chronicles Hollywood’s transition from silent to sound films in the late 1920s. I’ve had a mixed experience with Chazelle’s filmography. Whiplash is one of my favourite films of the 2010s, I couldn’t understand the praise for La La Land and I admired but didn’t love First ManBabylon is a return to form for Chazelle and is an ambitious, heady study of the history of cinema. It quite literally details the blood, sweat, tears and sheer luck needed to succeed in Hollywood and the strenuous work required to even film a single scene. Chazelle’s approach is unapologetic –  this is a sprawling, loud film that revels in excess be it through drink, drugs or discharging of bodily fluids. But it’s also regularly profound with characters wholly aware their Hollywood career has an expiry date. Although Chazelle’s view of the Hollywood studio system is critical, his passion for film as a medium is evident throughout this three hour plus extravaganza. I hope the mixed reception doesn’t discourage Chazelle from taking another ambitious risk. 

So the best film of the year is…

1) Oppenheimer

Oppenheimer is a tension-fuelled, thought-provoking minor-key masterpiece and is straight up there with director Christopher Nolan’s best work. It’s an incredibly rich piece of work and it left me feeling stone-cold with its characters haunting deliberation over the consequences of their work. This is a largely dialogue-heavy film for its lengthy three hour running time and except a breathtaking sequence depicting the Trinity test (even more impressive considering the minimal CGI), is largely bereft of action. Cillian Murphy has often represented one of the mechanisms to a successful Nolan film, and steps up to the lead role for Oppenheimer. His performance is simply sensational and a career-best. Oppenheimer is stacked with A-list actors, with Emily Blunt and Robert Downey Jr other notable highlights. The film is beautifully shot by now-Nolan regular Hoyte van Hoytema and Ludwig Göransson’s score is the glue that holds the film together. 


What are your favourite films of 2023? Let me know in the comments or tweet @TheFilmMeister

Best Films of 2023 (20-11)

Rankings, Year In Film

It’s the start of a new year so that means it’s time to reflect back on year just gone and bring you my top picks. 2023 was, overall a strong year for film, although apart from the upper echelons of this list, not quite on a par with 2022. There were far more misses than hits, especially on the sequel front.

Here, I’ll rank numbers 20 to 11. Numbers 10 to 1 will be detailed in a separate post so stay tuned for that.

20) Saltburn

Saltburn is the sophomore effort from Emerald Fennell, whose directorial debut was the razor-sharp feminist vigilante thriller Promising Young Woman, where she won an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay. Although this follow-up isn’t as strong, Saltburn is a darkly satirical piece that isn’t afraid to withhold the shock-factor. It has a raucous quality to it and explores the themes of excess and obsession, with thoroughly unlikeable, vampiric characters, although Fennell’s sharp script gives us plenty to make us invest in them. The film’s horror tinge is particularly satisfying and its narrative leaves you guessing where it might head to the very end, although a final twist does feel a little tacked on, especially on a rewatch. 

Although thoroughly entertaining for the most part, Saltburn suffers from its clashing of tones, at times feeling like St Trinians meets an Edgar Wright film with the darker, erotic undertones of The Talented Mr Ripley and Brideshead Revisited. I’d have preferred the film to do without the former, the tacked-on balloon celebratory stylings at odds with the film’s darker elements. The film would have had more bite if it leaned further into its Gothicism and the cheekiness of its erotic thriller elements. 

19) Dead For A Dollar

Dead For A Dollar released in the UK straight-to-DVD in February despite being released in most territories in 2022, hence its inclusion here. And what a shame it received such a low-key release because this is a lean and satisfying Western. Christoph Waltz is excellent as veteran bounty hunter Max Borlund who is hired by businessman Martin Kidd (Hamish Linklater, who also puts in a strong performance) to retrieve his wife Rachel (Rachel Brosnahan). Thrown into the mix is Willem Dafoe’s slimy card shark and armed robber Joe Cribbens and you have a exciting Western with some great lines and gleefully bloody violence.

18) The Whale

The Whale is the latest by Darren Aronofsky, his first film since mother!which proved divisive. Mostly set in a single location, this is an emotionally powerful experience with a terrific performance from Brendan Fraser as morbidly obese English teacher Charlie. Aronofsky beautifully explores the relationship between a father and his daughter and there are many touching moments focussing on Charlie’s outlook of life. I walked out of the film grateful and determined to further my relations with others and to always be positive. Yet, the film deftly conveys Charlie’s pain and hopelessness and it becomes inevitable early on that he is on a path of self-destruction. The way in which Aronofsky portrays binge-eating is particularly harrowing – like Requiem For A Dream will make you never want to touch drugs, The Whale is the equivalent for food. It wouldn’t be an Aronofsky film without the exploration of religion and the events on-screen are interwoven with religious parallels and texts, which lend a pathos to Charlie’s situation. 

17) The Fabelmans

The Fabelmans is a coming-of-age drama directed and co-written by Steven Spielberg, representing a passion project for the revered filmmaker. The film is a semi-autobiographical tale loosely based on Spielberg’s adolescence and burgeoning career. The Fabelmans isn’t quite the masterpiece some have professed it to be but it’s certainly a profound and candid effort. If you’re a film fan, this semi-autobiographical tale will definitely resonate in places. Protagonist Sammy’s love of the medium sometimes usurp his commitments to his family and relationships, and Spielberg deftly explores how filmmaking can consume an individual and how one needs to be reminded that your close ones are more important. It’s beautifully shot by Spielberg-regular Janusz Kaminski, although the film is a tad overlong. That said, it really nails its last half an hour or so. The Fabelmans is a tender reminiscence of Spielberg’s childhood and although it would benefit from tighter pacing, it’s a warm and personal experience with some excellent performances. 

16) Silent Night

Silent Night is an action thriller by John Woo, his first English language film since 2003’s negatively received Paycheck. A film almost devoid of dialogue, for the most part Silent Night is a return to form for Woo with a trio of giddy action sequences. Two car chases are particularly vividly shot, especially the opening one where we see both the chase itself overhead and from the perspective of a character running towards the cars from an alley. There’s also a terrific stairwell sequence that’s meant to feel as if it’s one take. The story is pretty simplistic and Woo isn’t known for his subtlety – the film feels overly schmaltzy at times and cutting this out would have resulted in an even leaner film. The lack of dialogue mostly works well, although there are scenarios the characters fin themselves in, such as a meeting at a police station, where two people clearly need to communicate with words. I think the film would have packed more of a punch with a limited script rather than with virtually no spoken words. Although overly sentimental in its tone, Silent Night is mostly a blast throughout. 

15) Reptile

Although it received sniffy reviews, I found Reptile to be a blast from start to finish. Previously most famous for his music videos, Grant Singer’s directorial debut is an exciting crime thriller with a terrific central performance from Benicio Del Toro as the weary detective Tom Nichols. Many thought the film was overlong at 136 minutes but I appreciated Singer taking his time to develop the characters and mystery. The film’s lusciously shot by Michael Gioulakis, who revels in the murky darkness and there’s a handful of particularly tense shoot-outs that are worth a watch alone.

14) Champions

There were a handful of underdog sports comedy films this year, such as Hustle and Next Goal Wins, but Champions is my pick of the bunch. Directed by Bobby Farrelly in his solo directorial debt, Woody Harrelson is terrific as temperamental minor-league basketball coach Marcus Marakovich who’s tasked with caoching a team of disabled players as community service. The laughs are not only consistent but balanced with plenty of heart and it’s a film where we not only root for the team but you’ll have a permanent smile plastered on your face from start to finish.

13) A Man Called Otto

I was very surprised I liked A Man Called Otto as much as I did, but Marc Forster’s remake of the 2012 Swedish film has tons of heart and a brilliant Tom Hanks performance at its centre as the lovable but grumpy Otto. This is a film about what it means to be lonely and the importance of caring neighbours. Mariana Treviño holds her own as Otto’s new Mexican neighbour, Marisol, as does Manuel Garcia-Rulfo as her kind-hearted but slightly useless husband. A Man Called Otto is transfixing from start to finish and has more than few home truths in it.

12) Knock At The Cabin

Knock At The Cabin is the latest by M. Night Shyamalan, whose once tarnished career is happily back on an uphill trajectory, as evidenced by Split, Glass and Old. A high-concept apocalyptic horror adapted from a novel by Paul G. Tremblay, the film follows a family of three on holiday in a remote cabin who are visited by a group of strangers, led by Leonard (Dave Bautista) who demand they sacrifice one of their own to prevent an impending apocalypse.  It’s a taut, intense ride while also being thought-provoking. This is not the first time the director’s explored the end of the world and this is a significant step-up from both After Earth and The Happening. Although the premise plays to Shyamalan’s strengths, as you’d expect he doesn’t do things by the book. The film does an excellent job of leaving you guessing the fanatical group’s motive – is the world really about to end? Are they telling the truth or are they suffering from some kind of psychosis? Shyamalan really makes the most of the mostly single location – the film doesn’t feel stagey and it’s beautifully shot by Jarin Blaschke, collaborating with Lowell A. Meyer. The cast are uniformly excellent and this may well be Dave Bautista’s best work yet, who is fantastic as the hulking yet polite Leonard. 

11) The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes

I wasn’t expecting to like this prequel to The Hunger Games as much as I did, which follows a young Coriolanus Snow (Tom Blyth) on his path to political power, the villain devilishly played by Donald Sutherland in the other films. Francis Lawrence returns in the director’s chair, having directed all of the previous entries bar the first. The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes is an excellent adaptation and quite possibly the most mature film in the series to date. Lawrence does a great job of showcasing the more outright barbarity of the games, which are minimalist and lack the polish and pizzazz of future arenas. In fact, the games in this film are set in a literal arena, rather than the forest or tropical settings of The Hunger Gamesand Catching Fire. Knowing Lucy Gray is unlikely to win, Snow suggests revisions to the game structure, such as sponsorship, to improve her chances, while simultaneously propelling the games as a spectacle to increase viewership. I really admired the film’s more cold-blooded tone and its deeper dive into Snow’s character, especially in the film’s third act, which many seem to have taken issue with.


So there we go, numbers 20 down to 11. Stay tuned for the Top Ten in a separate post…


What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments or tweet @TheFilmMeister